Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 23 Nov 1967

Vol. 231 No. 5

Adjournment Debate. - Irish Troops in Cyprus.

When I asked your permission to raise on the Adjournment the matter of the Irish contingent in Cyprus, in the light of the tense Greek-Turkish situation, I thought it was a matter which fell to be dealt with by the Department of External Affairs. I forgot then that we do not know where the Minister for External Affairs is. He is not here and not in the country as far as we can discover. Where in the name of God is he when his presence here is essential? It is a good guess that he is not in Cyprus. Where is he then?

Therefore, it falls on the Minister for Defence to deal with this. We must leave the location of the furtive ambassador-at-large and rely on the Minister we have here to answer our questions on this matter, about which I and many other people are so worried. The newspapers, radio and television have been reporting the increasingly serious situation which has developed in Cyprus between the Greeks and the Turks. Nobody wants to exaggerate the situation or to cause unnecessary worry—certainly I do not wish to do so—about the Irishmen in Cyprus, but one has to be realistic and try to anticipate events to some extent.

The newspapers today make it clear there is a grave danger of a major war in that area. We hope it does not happen: we hope so most sincerely. Quite apart from the question of our own people being in danger, quite naturally, we wish that there will not be any resort to large-scale armed force between those two conflicting elements, the Greeks and Turks, on this island which has had such a troubled history. However, the fact is that in Cyprus at the moment there are 500 Irishmen, officers and men of the Irish Army.

When we agreed to the despatch of the troops to Cyprus, Dáil Éireann understood that the function of the UN detachments there would be to effect a police action, to continue the conditions of armistice which were arrived at some years ago, to dampen down as far as it was possible to do so, by diplomatic and peaceful means, the fiery feelings which we know only too well can be associated with nationalism, and in general, to try to maintain the peace.

It must be said, of course, that the Irish troops, acting in concert with the troops of other nations under the flag of the UN, have done an admirable job. It can fairly be claimed that they have been responsible, as it were, for keeping the pot from boiling over, at least until now. But during the past week, there has been a grave deterioration of relations between the Greeks and the Turks and this fact has been brought home to us by reports which have been appearing daily. The seriousness of the position has grown daily and this morning the London Times reported that the Greek-Turkish crisis over Cyprus took a sudden turn for the worse last night. It said that the deterioration followed reports that Turkey had set a time limit for positive Greek action on the peace terms set by Turkey last Friday involving the withdrawal of the Greeks to a station in Cyprus.

We are not concerned with the question on which the disagreement is about. That is a question we must look at from a distance and we are not in any position to judge the merits or demerits of the dispute. We are anxious only for a peaceful solution. However, the grave danger is, now at this moment, that there may be a conflict. Everybody hopes there will not be. If that disastrous event occurs, I want to ask the Minister for Defence what will be the position of our men in Cyprus.

It has been the inevitable fate all through history that the peacemaker, in the heel of the hunt, has suffered most of all. To be caught in a situation of this sort, an international situation of so difficult a nature as this, is a most unfortunate circumstance. This is the first time, I think, I have read of actual physical attacks on men of the UN detachment there. It appears the Canadians were attacked last week and beaten up. The British have also been interfered with and the British and Canadians have been in consultation.

What are we doing about our boys there? I spoke yesterday to a soldier —I met him in my constituency—who has been in Cyprus and he said feelingly: "What are you doing about the lads in Cyprus? Are you aware that if anything happens there of a major nature, there is a grave possibility that our men may be in serious trouble." We do not wish to see a repetition of what happened elsewhere, in the Congo, for instance. I do not say this will happen in Cyprus, but we must take steps to see that nothing comparable happens.

When our men were in the Congo, we were told the Minister for External Affairs went there. We were given to understand that he went to see Tshombe. He did not do anything of the kind. Wearing green pants and all, he went to the hospital to shake hands. Leaving that aside, before some of the Deputies came in I was inquiring as to his whereabouts. We do not know. As Minister for External Affairs, he should be here and looking after the interests of these men in the trouble spot I speak of.

This does not arise for discussion. There is a responsible Minister replying to the debate, and that is sufficient.

I know that the Minister for Defence is responsible for the Army but I should be entitled to make at least a passing reference to the responsibility which must lie squarely on the Minister for External Affairs, too, because this is not a purely military operation, it embraces international activity in which the entire Government and the entire country and, ergo, the Department of External Affairs are involved. But, I am too concerned and too anxious about the situation to be diverted or to allow my mind to divert itself in the direction of saying what I would dearly love to say to that gentleman were he present in the House, as I have done on previous occasions.

I want to know on behalf of the Irish people—and speaking for the men themselves. I am sure they would like to have some information—what steps will the Government take in regard to these troops at this stage? What steps are open to them? It seems to me that there is only one logical step. When a serious war seems to be imminent and, judging by the world news last night, it appeared that way, we have no business there and let us get out of it. Let us protect the lives of our own men. I could, if I wished, talk about the fact that the UN have not paid for the services already given by the Irish in this peace-keeping operation but that is beside the point, immaterial, and would be a mean point to make. We are not concerned about that. We are concerned about the safety and welfare of our troops. If there is a quarrel between the two nations and if it has got to the point where nothing will settle it except bloodshed, let it not be Irish blood that will be involved in this distant war because for too long have we seen our people sent to the far ends of the earth to fight foreign wars.

It is stated in today's Cork Examiner editorial, that the entire UN force there is of such a relatively small, minute nature in terms of numbers that it could not affect the outcome if there were to be a major clash.

What side would they take?

It is not a matter of taking sides. Imagine a small group of people not concerned with the thing at all, from different parts of the world, trying to keep the ring for two such fiery antagonists as exist in this case. The situation would be really impossible. While saying that, I am also very conscious of the fact that we are most anxious as a nation to do whatever we can within reason to promote the cause of international peace and to keep the guns from being fired wherever we can throughout the world.

I should like to quote the editorial of the Cork Examiner, today's issue:

... the problems which plague Cyprus have grown instead of diminishing. Even the risk of war can no longer be dismissed as remote. The military junta which is in control in Greece, having failed to come to terms with the Turks, is in a position of weakness both because of its own nature and the ineptitude it has shown in matters of diplomacy. Turkey realises this and from a position of superior military strength is pressing home this advantage in Cyprus by harassment from the air and threats of invasion.

As far as one can read, Turkey can mount quite considerable forces for deployment in war, both in the air and in the field, and an invasion of Cyprus could only mean that our people would be in a very serious position.

I do not know if the Government have thought about this at all. Perhaps the crisis has come too suddenly for its gravity to be fully realised by the Government as yet, but, in any event, there does rest upon the Minister an obligation to tell the House, and through the House, the country and, not least of all, the men in Cyprus and their relatives here just what our plan is if this situation gets completely out of control, and it can so easily develop in this way. There is nothing. I suppose, that we can do to prevent it worsening. If there is anything we can do, our furtive ambassador does not seem to be making any contribution towards it. The Minister for Defence did go to Cyprus, I know, on one occasion but I do not know what steps he or this Government could take so removed from that island to lessen tensions there.

Highly skilled international diplomatists such as the Secretary-General of the UN, U Thant, and many others like him have given of their energies and efforts in this problem but it still seems not to lose momentum; it still seems to be heading towards a deepening and more depressing situation. The simple question then rests, and I have an obligation to ask it, equal to the Minister's obligation to answer it : what about our men? What is going to be done about them? Is it not only right and proper that in a situation of this kind, they should be brought home?

I do not want to minimise in any degree the grave situation that exists in Cyprus at the present time. I am glad Deputy Dunne has raised the question, and I am also glad that he has not asked for a general résumé of the conditions under which this peace-keeping force was first established or to go into the history of how it was established and the general decision that was taken here to send troops to be part and parcel of this force. But I am well aware of the situation that exists in Cyprus. We are in daily contact from here with our own battalion in Cyprus and we inquire as to the general situation. We seek information on the morale and general wellbeing of our troops. The United Nations Force in Cyprus is commanded by the Force Commander who is the representative there of the United Nations and he has certain instructions from the United Nations in the execution of his duties on the island and the deployment of the Force under his command.

I might remind the House and Deputy Dunne that the Force was established to keep the peace or to endeavour to keep the peace between the peoples on the island. It never was intended at any time that the United Nations peace-keeping force should hold the ring between the armed forces of outside nations who might, in their folly, make Cyprus a battleground.

On several occasions—not alone now but previously—Deputy Dunne has asked the whereabouts of the Minister for External Affairs. The simple answer is that the Minister for External Affairs is at the United Nations.

He is external.

He is coming home on holidays.

He is at the very heart of this question. He is there in constant and very close touch with U Thant and with the Secretariat of the United Nations. He is well informed of the situation. Both I and the Government are kept fully informed by the Minister for External Affairs of the situation in Cyprus. I can tell the House that yesterday evening the Secretary-General of the United Nations made an announcement that he had sent a high ranking official from his Secretariat, Mr. Rolz-Bennett, to the capitals of the countries concerned to make representations in relation to the desire of the United Nations to keep them from making Cyprus a battleground. He is now in Ankara. So long as the mission upon which these troops are engaged continues, so long as there is a hope of securing an arrangement whereby there will not be a major war and so long as we can convince ourselves that this force in Cyprus is there to keep the peace between the peoples on the island, and that they are in a position to do so, I think it would be very foolish to make a decision to withdraw our troops.

Having said that, I want to say also that one of the conditions under which this Dáil agreed to send our troops on this mission was that, in the event of a major conflict, the troops would be withdrawn. I am not saying they should be withdrawn from the island. To me, the meaning of the expression is that the Commander of the Force would withdraw his troops to a safe position if, at the time, they happened to be occupying a position in which they stood in real danger of being involved in a major war.

At the moment, strong diplomatic pressure from all angles is being brought to bear on all parties to keep the peace. I hope they will succeed in keeping the peace and that we shall not have an all-out major war on the island. It is included in the general plan in the operation of this Force that the Commander would take the necessary steps to withdraw his troops in the event of a major conflict. If that occurs, there is a new situation there and the first thing the Government would have to do would be to look at the new situation and make new decisions in relation to the continued presence of an Irish unit or of any Irish troops in this Force.

I want to allay any fears that may exist in people's minds either in the House or outside it that our troops, at the moment, are in real danger. I am satisfied myself they are not. I believe that the peace-keeping operation in Cyprus can be continued in comparative safety for the time being, but the position is continuously under review. Every effort is being made to secure the desired end for which the Force was created.

As far as I myself am concerned and as far as the Government are concerned, we are naturally very anxious about our troops abroad, but, when a decision is taken to send troops abroad —let it be on a peace-keeping operation or otherwise—there is an inherent risk. Whenever we agree to send our troops abroad on such a mission, it does not matter whether they are in Cyprus, the Congo or wherever else we may be asked to send our troops, the Dáil here gives approval for the operation. It is, therefore, only fit and proper that the matter should be raised here whenever there appears to be a change in the situation that existed when the decisions were taken here to send our troops abroad.

We are not sitting down on this question. We are fully informed by the Minister for External Affairs. At the moment, he is in constant and close touch with the situation there at the Headquarters of the United Nations. I can assure the House that I, as Minister for Defence, will keep the matter under review daily. We shall have our daily reports from Cyprus and we shall be well informed of any major change in the situation that can occur overnight or at any time. If the situation deteriorates in a major degree, then we shall not hesitate to take our troops home.

I do not think there is anything further that can be said on the matter. I think I have been as explicit as I possibly could. I do not think I have in any way tried to hide the gravity of the situation. At the same time, it is necessary to be calm in a situation of this kind and to avoid taking hasty decisions.

Our troops have earned for themselves high merit. If we were to act quickly, to make a decision before it is time to take troops home, it would create a very bad impression not alone abroad but at home, and even among the troops themselves. These men volunteered for the service with all goodwill. In their very volunteering, they accept all the grave responsibilities placed upon them—all the ranks—in this most important matter.

Deputy Dunne made the point that the United Nations had not honoured their word in relation to payments. I answered that question today.

I did not quite say it like that.

We will put it the way the Deputy said it himself—that they had not paid in full. They have paid in full to date except that there are outstanding amounts for current claims.

It is in course of being looked after. They have paid the large amount that was outstanding.

Deputy Aiken is doing something for us in New York, anyhow.

The Minister is a very loyal man to make that defence of our friend in the Hilton Hotel in New York.

The Dáil adjourned at 5.30 p.m. until 3 p.m. on Tuesday, 28th November, 1967.

Top
Share