With your permission, a Cheann Comhairle, I propose to take Questions Nos. 29 and 30 together.
I am aware that persons are squatting in Dublin Corporation houses. As, however, housing authorities are not required to notify me of details, I am not aware of the numbers involved. In so far as legislation is concerned, I would refer the Deputy to section 62 of the Housing Act, 1966, which provides that where there is no tenancy in a house and the occupier refuses to give up possession, the housing authority may apply to the district court for a warrant for possession. The section provides that the court, on being satisfied that demand for the house has been duly made, shall issue the warrant. When the corporation learn that a person is squatting in one of their dwellings, they immediately institute proceedings under these or other provisions. However, a period of time inevitably elapses in some cases before squatters are dispossessed.
Houses are allocated by local authorities under a carefully established and democratically decided order of priorities. While I recognise the human factors involved in the problem, I must add that it would be most unfair to families to whom houses have properly been allocated by local authorities to allow these priorities to be set aside by agitators and publicists exploiting genuine housing difficulties for their own disruptive ends, who encourage families awaiting rehousing to jump the queue by breaking the law, by illegal entry, and by violence. Any concession to these methods could only result in chaos and the gravest injustice in that houses would go to those who could exercise the greatest force rather than to those in greatest need.