Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 28 Apr 1970

Vol. 246 No. 1

Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Closing of Rural Garda Stations.

33.

asked the Minister for Justice the criteria used in deciding to close a rural Garda station.

34.

asked the Minister for Justice the methods used in consulting local people prior to the closure of a rural Garda station.

36.

asked the Minister for Justice if he has plans to close any further rural Garda stations in the next two years; and, if so, which stations.

37.

asked the Minister for Justice if he will consider the desirability of reversing the policy of closing Garda stations in rural areas in view of the increase in lawlessness in the State.

41.

asked the Minister for Justice the criteria used in deciding the optimum strength of the Garda Síochána.

With your permission, a Cheann Comhairle, I propose to take Questions Nos. 33, 34, 36, 37 and 41 together.

Over the past twelve months and more I have, in statements here and in replies to parliamentary questions, dealt at length with the strength and deployment of the Garda Síochána; and I do not think that I should have to go over that ground again at any length.

As regards criteria, there will, I think, be general acceptance that the optimum strength of the Garda Síochána is the minimum strength which, when deployed in the most effective way by reference to current requirements, and when equipped with adequate transport and other facilities such as radio, will provide an efficient service to deal with the basic responsibilities of the Garda Síochána. These responsibilities are the prevention and detection of crime, the control of traffic, and the maintenance of law and order. In recommending the closing of a particular station, the commissioner applies similar criteria—he has regard to the level of crime and of traffic, to the population and acreage involved and to all local circumstances. No station is closed without a certificate by the commissioner that he is satisfied that the station can be closed without detriment to the efficient policing of the area.

The review of the deployment of the force, which has been engaging my attention for some time, has now been expanded by the setting up within the Garda Síochána, as recommended by the Conroy Commission, of a research and planning unit, which is actively engaged in examining how the existing strength can be located and used to the best advantage in present conditions and in those likely to obtain in the future. I cannot at this stage give particulars of stations which may be closed in the next two years; this will have to await recommendations which the commissioner will make as a result of the work of the research and planning unit.

The assessment of police requirements in any area is a matter primarily for determination by professional policemen who are the best judges of methods of prevention and detection of crime and of police needs in the locality. This is not a matter that could be solved in open consultation with local residents, but the Garda authorities always take into account local reports as to the views of responsible citizens.

Would the Minister not agree that some form of consultation should be institutionally provided? Would he not agree that the information requested in Question No. 35 should be made available so that people can see that they are not losing anything, if that is the position, as a result of stations being closed? Would the Minister not agree that there has been concern in many areas that the closing of a station has led to a great increase in crime in those areas and that figures should be available in this regard so that people would be clear as to what is happening?

In regard to the last point made by the Deputy, that is not the case. In fact, increased mobility, radio equipment and so on have enabled smaller stations to be closed without any increase in the crime rate. The important aspect of this matter is to deal with crime: that is what a police force is for. The facts are that you have at the moment deployment of the force in many areas where crime is practically non-existent and you have the force under strength in areas where crime is rampant. The whole purpose of the proposed redeployment is to ensure that the resources available are deployed where crime is most evident. It is as simple and as logical as that.

35.

asked the Minister for Justice if he will give (1) a list of the rural Garda stations closed in the past ten years, (2) comparative figures for the crime rate in the areas covered by these stations in (a) the two years prior to the closure and (b) the two years subsequent to the closure and (3) the method by which these figures are worked out, and any estimated saving to the Exchequer resulting from the closure of each of the stations.

With your permission, a Cheann Comhairle, I propose to have circulated with the Official Report a list of the rural Garda stations and sub-stations closed in the ten-year period ended 24th April, 1970. Thirtynine stations and 19 sub-stations were closed in that period.

The particulars sought by the Deputy of crime at local station level are not available and could at this stage be compiled, if at all, only by the spending by members of the force of a great deal of time which could not be justified.

As regards the final portion of the question, I should emphasise that the most efficient use of manpower is the primary objective of the policy of redeployment. However, the total number of members attached to the stations and sub-stations which were closed was about 90. The closings made possible transfers to other centres where extra strength was urgently required and where otherwise extra recruitment would have been unavoidable. At current cost levels, the annual cost of 90 members, say, 20 sergeants and 70 gardaí, is not less than £150,000 so that maintenance of the existing stations and strengths would have cost £150,000 more than the Garda authorities thought necessary for adequate policing of the districts.

Following is the list referred to:

(A) List of Stations closed in the ten-year period ended 24th April, 1970.

Number

Station

Division

1.

Kilcrohan

Cork W.R.

2.

Quilty

Clare

3.

Knock

Do.

4.

Ballyheane

Mayo

5.

Fanore

Clare

6.

Blackrock

Cork E.R.

7.

Ballyhaise

Cavan/Monaghan

8.

Ballinderry

Roscommon/Galway E.

9.

Hollyfort

Wexford

10.

Birdhill

Clare

11.

Glangevlin

Cavan/Monaghan

12.

Rylane

Cork W.R.

13.

Donoghmore

Cork W.R.

14.

Kilmore

Sligo/Leitrim

15.

Murrisk

Mayo

16.

Connolly

Clare

17.

Morris Mills

Do.

18.

Inniskeen

Cavan/Monaghan

19.

Glasslough

Do.

20.

Puckaun

Tipperary

21.

Newtownforbes

Longford/Westmeath

22.

Donadea

Carlow/Kildare

23.

Cappagh

Waterford/Kilkenny

24.

Ballincurrig

Cork E.R.

25.

Croghan

Roscommon/Galway E.

26.

O'Briens Bridge

Clare

27.

Abbeyshrule

Longford/Westmeath

28.

Railyard

Waterford/Kilkenny

29.

George's Cross

Louth/Meath

30.

Camolin

Wexford

31.

Wolfhill

Leix/Offaly

32.

Grousehall

Cavan/Monaghan

33.

Eyeries

Cork E.R.

34.

Carrow-kennedy

Mayo

35.

Mountbolus

Leix/Offaly

36.

Ballybrittas

Leix/Offaly

37.

Dromore-West

Mayo

38.

Ballintogher

Sligo/Leitrim

39.

Curry

Do.

(B) List of Sub-Stations closed in the ten year period ended 24th April, 1970.

Number

Sub-station

Division

1.

Rockchapel

Cork W.R.

2.

Kilfenora

Clare

3.

Cloonfad

Roscommon/Galway E.

4.

Killavullen

Cork E.R.

5.

Paulstown

Waterford/Kilkenny

6.

Gortnahoe

Do. Do.

7.

Dungourney

Cork E.R.

8.

Ballylooby

Tipperary

9.

Clerihan

Do.

10.

Hollyford

Do.

11.

Allihies

Cork W.R.

12.

Ballyclough

Cork E.R.

13.

Banteer

Cork W.R.

14.

Rahan

Leix/Offaly

15.

Barndarrig

Wexford

16.

Cloonacool

Sligo/Leitrim

17.

Knocklong

Limerick

18.

Tullogher

Wexford

19.

Caherdaniel

Kerry

Top
Share