Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 4 Feb 1971

Vol. 251 No. 5

Committee on Finance. - Vote 43: Defence (Resumed).

Debate resumed on the following motion:—
That a supplementary sum not exceeding £10 be granted to defray the charge which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 31st day of March, 1971, for the salaries and expenses of the Office of the Minister for Defence, including certain services administered by that Office; for the pay and expenses of the Defence Forces and for payment of a grant-in-aid.
—(Minister for Defence).

Speaking on this Estimate last week I was referring to the recruitment of suitable men for the Defence Forces. Unfortunately, methods of recruitment have not met with the success we would wish. I suggest to the Minister that some more imagination should be used to encourage suitable young men to join the Defence Forces. Officers have visited secondary schools for the purpose of recruiting suitable cadets. Perhaps it would be possible to arrange to meet parent groups in different areas; that might meet with some success.

I have a particular objection to one method of recruitment. When FCA units go into barracks for training a regular Army officer appears, generally after the first weeks training, and he encourages the young men to join the Army. There is nothing wrong in encouraging them to join the Army but I dislike the method adopted because some of these young men have joined, without their parents' permission, and have caused a great deal of inconvenience in their homes as a result of doing so. Farm work and business have been disrupted because they have not obtained the consent of their parents before joining the Army. This method of recruitment should be stopped.

With regard to the FCA, in 1949 the young men who went for annual training received a gratuity of £6 and in 1971 an FCA volunteer going on annual training receives the same amount of money. In 1949 an FCA NCO going on annual training got £8 and in 1971 he still receives the same gratuity. An FCA officer in 1949 received £10 and in 1971 the gratuity is still £10. An OC of an FCA company received £15 in 1949 and in 1971 the figure is the same.

I would ask the Minister to be realistic. Now that our FCA is a vital force in each brigade within the Army I would ask him to give some further encouragement and to increase the gratuity to a figure which is just and which bears some relation to present day standards. I should also like to refer to the FCA uniform which is to be replaced in a year, or in a year and a half's time. Over the past 20 years I have attended conferences in The Curragh with former Ministers for Defence, with OC's of the different commands in the Army and suggestions have been made to the Ministers in regard to the best method of improving the FCA and the best method of encouraging men to continue as good members.

I can truthfully say that in those 20 years, despite the fact that intelligent suggestions were made from both regular and FCA commanders, I have never seen one of those suggestions implemented. This hardy annual of improving the uniform of the FCA has been discussed up and down the country but still the same uniforms have been mass-produced. These are ill-fitting; they are either too long or too loose and rarely can they be described as being properly fitting. I suggest that it might be worth considering measuring men for their uniforms so that they will fit them. I have seen piles of measurement forms but I have seen nothing being done about it. Every man in the FCA and in the Army should be measured so that he will have a properly fitting uniform. It has been said here that rarely do we see men in the street who are proud of their uniforms. If properly fitting uniforms were issued it would be some contribution towards having a more contented group of men.

FCA transport is deplorable. If you have not got a mobile Army and mobile units then you just get bogged down. I know two FCA battalions in which there is practically no transport. In one battalion a station wagon has been taken away and given to another battalion, leaving the former unit without any transport.

The Government should make an adequate sum of money available to the Department in order to provide adequate transport for our Defence Forces. Why this position has been allowed to continue I do not know. Trucks purchased in 1952 are still being used and no effort is being made to replace them with modern transport. It is very difficult to understand the mentality behind the decision to permit a necessary corps of the Army to degenerate in this way. It is a tribute to our fitters and mechanics that they can maintain this transport in its present condition. Any visit to a barracks will show that the transport is well maintained but the cost of doing this must be prohibitive.

I should like now to refer to some injustices in the Army. A single man who retires after 21 years service gets no gratuity. There is no good reason why such a man should be deprived of a gratuity simply because he is not married. He gave the same service and did the same duties as a married man, yet he is not being rewarded. That is an injustice which should be rectified. Another injustice exists in regard to NCOs and men in receipt of old age pensions. When they receive the old age pension they go from the high rate of increment to the low rate. That is after 21 years service. The Department should look into this. These are just a few points to highlight some defects and a few suggestions so that things can be improved in the Defence Forces.

Reference was made to Army competitions and the suggestion was made that there should be more competitions. If those who made these suggestions were familiar with the competitions already operating they would not suggest overloading the present fine programmes of training. You have inter-company competitions, inter-battalion competitions, inter-brigade competitions and command and all-Army competitions in all weapons, in all sports and in all forms of athletics. If further competitions were introduced it is possible that the necessary training would not be given to the majority of the men in the forces. When you enter a competition you train a limited number to a very high standard and because you devote a lot of time to a small group it is probable that there is not the same time available to devote to the greater number.

If we continue with the programmes we have in operation and if we succeed as well as in the past we will be doing quite well. I should like to pay tribute to the men of the regular Army who introduced into the FCA the various competitions, whether basketball, football or other sports. I consider it a worthwhile project to introduce these various competitions in the battalions. I paid tribute last year to the men who were responsible for introducing these competitions and I should like to repeat my appreciation of the work carried out by the NCOs and the officers in this regard.

If we enter the EEC there will be further demands on our Army and it is essential that our equipment be maintained at a standard equal to that of other member countries of the Community. It is possible that we might have to make a contribution of, say, a battalion and should this situation arise we must be prepared to cope with it.

I should like to make reference to our Army personnel on overseas duties and I commend the Minister for the treatment he has given to Army men in this regard. Quite recently the men received some overtime payments which were due for overseas service and the Minister has the gratitude of the men. Our forces have distinguished themselves overseas, whether on the Gaza Strip, in Cyprus or elsewhere. Last year we made the complaint that they had not been paid in respect of this overtime and we are pleased that it is now rectified.

With regard to the Army bands, it is necessary to give some attention to the recruitment of men who have a flair for music. It is also desirable that the personnel in these bands should have an attractive uniform and I regret to say that I do not consider the present uniform very becoming. In the issue of uniforms to our Army personnel much more thought should be given to the design of the uniforms because it is important that the men present a neat and smart appearance. This is particularly essential when our Army appears at, for instance, the Dublin Horse Show, at functions for visiting dignitaries and on special occasions. Much is expected of our Army band and it is important that they present a smart appearance.

With regard to our equitation school, it is well known that those who have engaged in competitions abroad have brought credit to our country with the victories they have gained. However, if they are to continue to achieve good results in competitions abroad the men must have good animals. I suggest that our Army officers and those people who purchase suitable animals for our equitation school should visit the various shows throughout the country. They should take note of the animals who compete in the competitions in these shows and in this way they would be in a position to make recommendations regarding the purchase of suitable animals.

It is time we considered whether we are getting an adequate number of engineers in the engineering corps of the Army and if this is not so we should do something about it. Looking back over a number of years, I doubt whether we can feel happy about the situation. It is vital in any Army that the corps of engineers should be properly staffed and of a very high standard and this cannot be done if qualified engineers do not enter the corps.

Because of improved pay and conditions in the Army there should be a greater tendency for young men to offer their services but as the competition from civilian jobs is quite keen the Army have a difficult problem in recruitment. I am not suggesting that we should reduce in any way the method of discipline that exists in the Army because a high standard of discipline is vital. Some people have suggested that we should allow young men to wear their hair long, as in the popular trend, and they have suggested that this would encourage more recruits. However, that is a matter on which the Army authorities must use their own judgment and I realise that Army personnel must look neat and smart on all occasions.

In the matter of civil defence it is necessary to continue training throughout the country. It may not ever become necessary to cope with atomic fallout, but the information gained in civil defence lectures will be useful in civilian life. The men and women who attend these lectures gain useful knowledge; they are most efficiently trained and we should not underrate the contributions made by the instructors, wardens and Army officers who are involved in this work. We should encourage all civilians who are able to do so to volunteer their services to the civil defence effort.

Some complaints have been made about soldiers who do not get an opportunity because of age to go overseas. I am aware that a man must be medically fit before he can leave his own barracks or command. However, I have known men who went to the North of Ireland under canvas and they were able to endure their terms of duty. The age limit should be extended to give some of the soldiers an opportunity of sharing in the contribution made by their friends in the regular Army.

I am very pleased the Minister has strongly indicated his intention to improve conditions in the Army. I hope in the year to come he will continue to pay particular attention to the housing of our soldiers. The National Building Agency have, to date, erected between 400 and 500 houses for the Garda. That agency did a splendid job and they should now be directed to providing houses for our regular Army men. Men in Sarsfield Barracks in Limerick and Collins Barracks in Cork find it very difficult to get houses when they retire. Replacements have been made in Sarsfield Barracks and other places but it is only recently that effort was made. Again regular men assigned to duties in different areas should get priority from the local authority, and the Minister for Local Government, in consultation with local authorities, should allocate houses for these men. These men are assigned rapidly to an area. There is a big upset to their families if they cannot get suitable accommodation. This is a problem which has been in existence for years and it must be tackled at some stage or other.

It is gratifying to note the recent purchases of vessels for our Naval Service. We hope they will provide adequate coastal protection. This is an improvement which has been sought over a long number of years.

Although we would always hope our Defence Forces would not need to be a belligerent force and would always be assigned to peaceful missions, there should be no skimping on expenditure which is necessary to maintain and equip a modern Army. A great deal of leeway has to be made up because for years there has been far too much skimping. An effort must be made to rebuild something which has been overlooked for far too long.

I wish to thank Deputies for their contributions to this debate, and also to express my appreciation of the tributes paid to the work of our services throughout the year. Heavy demands were made on our Defence Forces. They have stood up to them admirably and have proved that the confidence we have in our Defence Forces is well founded. I am happy to say also that it has been a rewarding year for the Defence Forces in so far as substantial pay adjustments were made as well as adjustments in pensions and gratuities.

I was particularly interested to hear the remarks of Deputy Clinton, Deputy Coughlan and Deputy Malone following their visits to military establishments. Deputy Clinton may have got the impression that obstacles were put in his way regarding these visits, but I can assure him that was not the case. The important thing is that he did eventually visit The Curragh. I entirely agree with his sentiment that if there is one area in this country where there should be no party politics it is the Army. It was in that spirit that I agreed to the visits, and I would earnestly ask that it would always be respected.

I am pleased that Deputies had some very generous things to say as a result of what they saw and experienced. As might be expected, some of our shortcomings were highlighted, and I must concede that if I were on the other side of the House I would be endeavouring to pinpoint such shortcomings as well. I myself am acutely conscious of them and nothing would please me better than to spend generously on such things as new barracks, new married quarters, transport, uniforms, radio equipment, weapons and so on. However, public funds and the share of them available for Defence are strictly limited and we must chose our priorities.

I have endeavoured to provide the best possible conditions for our officers and men as reflected in pay, allowances and pensions. I doubt if, by and large, any other vocation comprehends as wide a range of skills and professions and offers comparable opportunities and rewards.

The maintenance of an Army, even a small one like our Army, is very costly and I should like to give some figures which will illustrate that point: 1,000 men would cost about £1 million per annum to feed, cloth and house, to say nothing of their equipment; one armoured car costs £40,000; an armoured personnel carrier costs about £20,000; a medium helicopter costs £100,000; a single shell can cost up to £95; a modest fishery protection vessel costs about £1 million; a radio transmitter can cost anything up to £25,000; a married quarters would cost £4,000 or £5,000. These figures give some idea of the massive sums required to maintain an Army.

Deputies will appreciate the financial problems that would be involved if we were to support all of these needs simultaneously. I believe the estimates before the House represent the best assessment of the priorites.

I was a bit disappointed to hear Deputy Cooney speak in such gloomy tones of what he alleges is the low professional morale of our Army. I entirely disagree with him. Only last week I was down in Killarney commemorating the 50th anniversary of a very historic engagement at a place called Tureengarriff on the Cork-Kerry border where a small party of I.R.A. successfully attacked an enemy convoy. In that attack the equipment of the party consisted of a poor Hotchkiss gun, a few rifles and a few shot guns. Nevertheless, the operation was successful and of the 26 participants in that engagement five were present at the function last week and from my observation they were as eager and spirited last week in Killarney as they were 50 years ago. I find it hard then to accept that now in 1971 Irishmen dressed in the uniform of their country, well paid and reasonably well equipped should lack in spirit or in purpose. The bearing and performance of our men at home and in foreign lands is abundant proof of the quality of our armed forces. I am quite happy that there is a high level of professional morale within our forces and I would oppose any suggestion to the contrary.

I have endeavoured to assemble as much information as possible on the points raised by the Deputies in the course of the debate. The question of Army equipment was raised by Deputies Clinton, Coughlan, Cooney, Dowling and Tully and in this connection I want to say that a continuing programme of capital expenditure has been in progress over the years for the purchase of equipment of all types. The weapons and other equipment purchased for the Defence Forces are up to date and much the same as their counterparts in other armies. Their numbers and level of sophistication are, of course, limited by the relatively small financial provision available annually for the purchase of arms and equipment generally.

Regarding transport vehicles, we have in the last two financial years purchased nine land rovers, 11 trucks, 11 saloons, 11 station wagons, 20 motor cycles and eight other such vehicles. This year we are purchasing 64 land rovers, seven trucks, six station wagons and four ambulances. I hope to make further substantial purchases of vehicles in the next year. I am fully conscious of our transport shortcomings and I hope from what I have indicated here that Deputies will be satisfied that this aspect of military requirements is receiving attention and will receive further attention in the coming year.

The question of Army and FCA clothing has been mentioned by a number of Deputies including Deputies Clinton, Coughlan and Tully. As I mentioned in my opening speech it has been decided to introduce a new type of cloth for uniforms for both Army and FCA. This will give the desired improved appearance. Perhaps also there is excessive fault-finding with Army dress. I am aware of the need for its improvement and this matter is in hands at the moment. We expect that when the present stocks have been used up the new uniforms will be available in about 1½ years.

The need for new barracks in the Dublin area has been referred to by Deputies Clinton and Dowling. We recognise that there is need for the building of new barracks and the modernisation of existing ones but there again the financial limitation is the restricting factor.

Portobello must be worth £2 million, to sell the site alone.

I should be quite happy to think that it would be and that we could build a new barracks in its place. We need the accommodation but until such time as we can be assured of having our new barracks we would be ill-advised to part with our existing possessions. In the matter of billets, efforts are mainly directed at the improvement of billets for soldiers and the improvement of married quarters. According to my estimation the sale of existing barracks would hardly provide for the cost of a new barracks but again I can assure Deputies that this is a requirement we fully recognise and we are giving it very full consideration and when the opportunity presents itself we shall certainly take advantage of it and provide the much-needed military accommodation in the form of new barracks.

The question of the shortage of married quarters has been mentioned by Deputies Clinton and Dowling. In this connection I should say that the provision of houses for soldiers must primarily remain a matter for the local authority concerned. A soldier has an equal claim with other members of the community on the local authority. The policy of the Department is to supplement as far as possible housing requirements where the need is greatest. Since 1954 the Department has built 176 such houses including 88 in Dublin, 24 in Cork, 20 in Athlone, 30 at The Curragh, eight in Naas and six in Limerick.

The matter of the duties of officers' orderlies was referred to by Deputies Dowling and Clinton. They suggest that the system of providing officers' orderlies should be eliminated. Batmen orderlies have traditionally been allocated to officers occupying quarters in barracks to maintain these quarters as well as the officers' equipment and uniforms in proper condition. I cannot see any justification for changing this system.

The lack of facilities available to serving soldiers to make suggestions has been mentioned by Deputies Clinton and Cooney. There is nothing to prevent an officer or soldier whether inside or outside Dublin from making suggestions through the normal military channels and if they do so there is no apparent reason why these suggestions should not get through. In this connection also I think that rather unfair remarks were passed regarding the civil side of the Department. There are, of course, the normal channels through which an officer or soldier can seek redress under Military Defence Regulations.

Deputy Dowling referred to what he described as depressing conditions at Naas. The apprentices are accommodated to a large extent in wooden huts. It is planned to replace them with a new building but delays have occurred in getting the site. Agreement has now been reached with the Naas Urban Council for the acquisition of its interest in an acre of land adjoining the barracks. The legal formalities have not yet been completed but it is hoped they will be in a short time and it will then be possible to proceed with the building of substitute accommodation.

What about equipment?

As regards equipment we concede that improvements are desirable but the present equipment meets essential requirements. While some of it might be old it is fairly adequate. We shall endeavour to replace it with more modern equipment and improve that aspect as well.

Deputy Dowling also raised the question of electric fittings. Considerable progress has been made in the installation of electrical plugs in married quarters. There are problems because of shortage of current in the mains but it is hoped the ESB will take over the direct supply to these quarters in the near future and it will then be possible to install all the additional fittings required.

The question of overholders has again been raised, this time by Deputy Dowling. The provision of houses for non-military personnel is a matter for the local authorities concerned and they are generally in our experience co-operative in this matter. We advise soldiers who are going to retire from the Permanent Defence Force to apply to the local authorities concerned for re-housing. We also make recommendations to the appropriate local authority to facilitate such personnel as best they can. We recognise that it is sometimes difficult for retiring men to acquire accommodation but it must be appreciated that married quarters in the Army are for serving personnel. We cannot agree to the continued occupation of quarters by people who have ceased to serve.

Deputy Cooney thinks that the Civil Defence service should be trained by the military instead of being in the hands of local authorities. As its very name implies, Civil Defence is a part of national defence which does not come within the province of military activities as such—it is designed to mitigate the effects of war on the civilian population. The reason why it was decided that local authorities should carry out civil defence functions was that the kind of organisation necessary to carry out such functions as, for example, bringing succour to people who have lost their homes, and the rescuing of people trapped in catastrophies such as fire or flooding, are operations which should be conducted under the direction of the local authorities. On occasions the military may be called in to assist in such operations but they only do so in cases of extreme need. It is in the main the responsibility of the Civil Defence forces to provide help in these circumstances. It must be remembered that the military have sufficient work in their own field and they would be unnecessarily overburdened if they were given the additional duties of Civil Defence work.

Deputy Cooney also dealt with allowances for officers serving with the United Nations Truce Supervision Organisation in the Middle East. The Deputy seems to have got his information a little mixed up. There is no question of remedying some situation without it costing a penny to the Exchequer by making a claim to the United Nations. The position is that officers engaged on these duties have since June, 1969, been in receipt of subsistence allowance of $12.50 a day from the United Nations. Prior to that time the allowance was $10 a day. The question of paying additionally an overseas allowance, which would come out of our own Exchequer, has been under consideration for some time and it has been decided to grant such an allowance. It will be at the rate of £1 a day for the period from 1st June, 1967, to the 31st December, 1970, and £1 10s a day thereafter. In some cases this will mean an officer will receive a lump sum of something over £700 which I think adequately meets the requirements under this heading.

Deputy Cooney made a passing comment about the Red Cross, and at this time, when the investigations are being carried out, I think it was inappropriate of the Deputy to have referred to the activities of the Red Cross at all. I think the Deputy might well have refrained from making the comment which he did make.

Deputy Cooney also mentioned ONE. He felt that more use could be made of ONE. I am not sure what the Deputy has in mind but my Department co-operates as far as possible with ONE in the matter of the resettlement of discharged personnel. We have meetings with representatives of ONE in order to discuss problems.

Deputy Coughlan had an interesting tour of barracks in both the Southern and Western Commands. I may sum up by saying his remarks on his experiences were highly gratifying. I am obliged to him, as I am to Deputy Clinton and Deputy Malone, for their comprehensive reports on what they saw in these places. Deputy Coughlan referred to the cooking ranges installed many years ago in the Kickham Barracks in Clonmel. He said they were out of date and I think he is quite justified in saying that. These ranges are no longer being manufactured and it is proposed to have them replaced by gas or electric cookers as they become unfit for use. Deputy Coughlan also referred to the equipment which is lying idle in the vicinity of Kickham Barracks. These are items for which it is difficult to obtain spares. If it is found that spares cannot be obtained the equipment will be disposed of. This is a minor matter and one which is receiving attention.

The selection of personnel for service in Cyprus was mentioned by Deputy Clinton and Deputy Malone. Their remarks were in the nature of an inquiry as to how personnel were selected. Many factors have to be taken into consideration. It is a testing engagement and the selection of the men must necessarily be left in the hands of military personnel who are conversant with the capabilities of each individual medically and professionally. I think there is not any justification for interfering with the present system. The standard of physical fitness, age and standard of training and efficiency and the recommendations of the immediate superior officers are taken into account. From what I have seen of our troops in Cyprus I would compliment the selecting officers on their choice. These men are behaving in an exemplary fashion and they are a credit to our country. The care and attention that is given to the selection of men for such service cannot be overstressed.

Could the Minister do anything to meet the request of the senior NCOs for an extension of the upper age limit to 55 for this type of duty?

Age is a prime factor and we must be guided by the recommendations of the senior military and medical officers in relation to selection. We are in their hands and it is right and proper that we should be because they are the people closely associated with the Army and they are in the best position to select age-wise and otherwise the most suitable personnel.

The strength of the Army was referred to by Deputies Clinton and Tully. Deputy Clinton inquired about the present strength of the Army and whether normal recruiting was going on. The strength of the Permanent Defence Force as on 31st December, 1970 was 8,563 comprised of 1,119 officers and 7,444 men. In addition there were, as on that date, 226 members of the Reserve, First Line, on full time service. The special advertising and recruiting campaign has been discontinued but normal recruiting is, of course, in progress. We will need to undertake a special recruiting drive for recruits for the Naval Service and this will be undertaken in the very near future.

The question of the provision of fishery protection vessels was mentioned by Deputy Clinton. As I already pointed out we have agreed to purchase three minesweepers. An all-weather fishery protection vessel is being built at present at Cobh and this will be ready for delivery in March, 1972. The first of the minesweepers will be brought into service in the middle of this month and the remaining two will come into service in March. This is a highly desirable development in fishery protection and it will, I assure the House, be the intention of the Department of Defence to take every opportunity to further strengthen the defensive potential of our Naval Service. As well as that, of course, a decision has been taken to purchase three all-weather fishery protection vessels.

Deputy Cooney referred to the question of resettlement of officers. I mentioned that officers become eligible for pension after relatively short service. This is a great help to those officers who wish to retire to take up civilian employment. The fact that many officers in future will have an opportunity of obtaining a university degree should also prove of benefit as far as resettlement is concerned. The question of undue numbers retiring has probably been exaggerated. The conditions under which they retire must be taken into account. Officers qualify for pension at an early age and by virtue of their military training, and now with the addition of a university degree, they are considered eminently suitable personnel for civilian employment. We are not opposed to early retirement. We are happy to see our young officers capable and qualified to undertake responsible civilian employment.

Deputy Clinton referred to Army involvement in the local community. This is highly desirable but the position is that, as for others in the Public Service, there are restraints, of course, on military personnel whose contribution to aspects of community life is thus circumscribed. Subject to such restraints personnel can and do participate effectively in cultural, social, charitable and sporting activities. I should point out, however, that the Army are fully occupied in meeting their military obligations and we have to call on the services of the FCA for security. Because of this we are conscious of the fact that the Army are fully committed and we do not encourage over-involvement in local community matters. This is only reasonable and sensible.

Deputy Clinton mentioned the undesirability of soldiers filling in their time doing unnecessary chores. It is recognised, of course, that some of the duties of soldiers are routine and tedious but none of them are unnecessary. They are all required in one way or another to run the barracks and units to which soldiers belong.

Deputy O'Leary asked about FCA accommodation in some villages and towns. We are not aware of any general deficiency in FCA accommodation. However, in so far as financial resources permit, a programme is proceeding of replacing rented accommodation used by the FCA Company Headquarters with newly constructed State-owned premises. The same Deputy alleges that there are derelict FCA halls in many rural areas. We have no knowledge of such conditions. If we get more specific information on the matter we will certainly have it looked into.

Deputy Malone expressed the opinion that some of The Curragh lands should be given to Kildare County Council to enable them to solve their housing problems and the problem of housing for Army personnel. May I remind him that in 1966 my Department offered to sell to the Council two acres of The Curragh for the erection of 12 houses but the Council intimated that they were not interested in acquiring the site? As Deputy Power mentioned I have recently indicated that I am still prepared to examine sympathetically any application from Kildare County Council or the National Building Agency for housing sites on The Curragh.

Deputy Malone is also concerned about the curtailment of the activities of certain traders in The Curragh Camp. I want to clarify the position by saying that in recent years the camp has been inundated by agents of various firms, many of whom engage in high-pressure door-to-door salemanship. This traffic created a grave security risk. It also resulted in the families of military personnel in the camp getting into financial difficulties. The Officer Commanding the Camp, who is responsible for Camp security, decided that the passes issued to all these agents should be withdrawn on a phased basis so as to allow them to clear up any outstanding accounts with residents of the Camp. I am satisfied that the action of the Commanding Officer was reasonable in the circumstances.

Deputy Malone referred to a deputation of Curragh sheep owners which I received some time ago accompanied by Deputy Boylan, Deputy Power and himself. This deputation dealt with the improvement of the lands at The Curragh. Following that meeting I invited proposals from the Association for the carrying out of various works of fertilisation and rehabilitation generally which would not impose any financial burden on the State. This was only reasonable. So far we have not had a reply from the Association. So far as the provision of sheep-dipping tanks is concerned, this is a matter for the Association to arrange with the local authority.

Deputy Tully had much to say about civil defence. I would like to thank him for his complimentary remarks about the personnel of this service which rightly deserve the tribute. The civil defence are doing an excellent job. The Deputy feels that the organisation is not up to the strength which the press would lead one to believe. In my introductory speech I have already dealt with this point by mentioning that a special check was made in 1969 of the effective strength of civil defence. Of the 26,000 trained volunteers on the rolls who were asked in writing if they intended to continue membership and report for duty if required to do so in an emergency, some 14,000 people replied in the affirmative. This is a satisfactory picture and it establishes the real truth of the situation. Taking into account the hazards of modern nuclear warfare which could have widespread effects, it is necessary to have as many civil defence volunteers as possible trained in every part of the State so as to ensure that expert help would be available at all points very quickly in case of necessity. I do not think that Deputy Tully's suggestion of a small, select band of volunteers would give us the coverage which we have at the moment or would be more effective than the present system. I have not received any complaints from the civil defence personnel about the shortage of equipment.

Deputy Tully referred also to the Northern refugees and to the camp at Gormanston. Refugees naturally create problems but we have a humane responsibility to ensure that they are fully looked after. We must provide food and suitable accommodation and as well as that, we must provide it in the most suitable and practical location. Gormanston was one of the camps selected because of its convenient location. Since the necessary organisation and equipment had been provided at Gormanston it would be wasteful in personnel and materials to duplicate it elsewhere. The camp was able to cope with the problem. It was necessary to open refugee centres in other places to take the overflow.

I appreciate the point made by the Deputy about Gormanston being perhaps too convenient for those who might adopt the role of refugee unnecessarily, and prolong their stay. This is the type of problem which we expected, but we must be very tolerant in dealing with distressed people and we must try to ensure that we provide for distressed persons even if, on occasion, we are providing for people who would hardly come within the category of genuine refugee. That problem is still on our hands. We are endeavouring to cope with it but for the present we must bear with it. I am not aware of any refugees from Gormanston Camp or any other camp going to the hairdressers, the local supermarkets or the pictures in taxis at the expense of the State. I do not think we are affording that luxury, and I hope we are not doing so.

Deputies Tully and Coughlan were concerned about the quality of bacon being supplied to our army personnel. I may explain that Grade B bacon is purchased for the army. This bacon is above the average quality available to householders generally. I consider the quality of bacon is reasonable. From what I have seen myself this is the fact, and the army are getting the best possible quality of bacon. There is no case for complaint in this respect.

Deputy O'Leary voiced the feelings of many when he recommended the extension of free travel to the wives of veteran holders of free travel cards. From our point of view I should say that the Department of Defence scheme follows the scheme for old age pensioners operated by the Department of Social Welfare. Under this scheme spouses have free travel only when accompanying pensioners. The idea of the extension of the scheme to spouses was that many old age pensioners, even if they have free travel, are unable to get about on their own. This is why the extension was granted. The same principle has been applied to the scheme in the Department of Defence for veterans. If spouses of veterans were given unrestricted free travel it would be impossible to refuse the same concession to widows of veterans. Many veterans died without ever applying for pension or medal. At this point of time the amount of investigation which would be involved in establishing eligibility could be very heavy and, perhaps, impossible because so many of the verifying officers are dead. If widows of veterans were given unrestricted free travel, there would be a similar demand from the widows of old age pensioners. In effect, all widows would have to be eligible. This problem goes beyond the functions of the Department of Defence.

In a case where the veteran is so infirm that he is not able to leave the house, could his voucher not be passed on to his wife who does his shopping and chores for him?

We would like to grant that extension but if a precedent is established, where does one draw the line? If such a concession is given to one, it must be given to all.

Could it be given on a doctor's certificate? Could the Minister give any idea of the numbers involved because, in honesty, I do not feel that the comparison with old age pensioners is quite the same as with veterans and people who have been awarded these services. I believe that they are more deserving cases.

Possibly. It is debatable, of course, whether their condition is worse than that of old age pensioners. It would create an enormous problem. It is the size of the problem rather than the amount involved that is the main concern because if you extend it, as I say, to enable wives to travel unaccompanied by their qualified husbands, you will then automatically have to extend it to the widows. This would be only fair and reasonable to the widows of the old IRA men. This would be a very sizeable task.

Would not a simple pass for the widows be sufficient, signed by the Department?

This is where our problem begins, so to speak. Many old IRA men did not apply. They died before the medals were issued. You would then have the problem of defining and identifying a widow of an old IRA man, that is, the widow of a person who had not got a medal but who would have qualified for a medal if he had applied. It is a far-ranging kind of difficulty.

Deputy O'Leary raised the question of a scheme of pensions for the widows of Old IRA veterans. There is, of course, already provision for pensions for widows of veterans who had disability pensions under the Army Pensions Acts. The transfer to widows of the military service pensions or special allowances held by their husbands presents many difficulties both in terms of costs and otherwise. I can say that I have special sympathy for this proposal and at the moment I am looking into the matter to see if it can be put into effect. At this point I could hardly make any definite promise. It certainly is getting very sympathetic consideration and it is one recommendation we would be highly pleased to put into operation because we can well recognise the plight of the widow of a veteran.

Deputy O'Leary also raised the question of the means test for special allowances. He looks for a more liberal approach generally in regard to special allowances. In actual fact, the means test has been relaxed considerably over the years. It would be tedious to give all the details of these relaxations. As Deputy O'Leary referred particularly to unmarried sons and daughters, I should to say that in such cases the income of the children is not taken into account. What is taken into account is the contribution they make to the household, and that to a limited extent only. No assessment is made in respect of the first £3 10s of the contribution in a rural area or the first £4 in an urban area.

Deputy Taylor referred to the FCA grants and reserve grants. In this connection I should say that the annual grant is only one item in the total remuneration payable to the reserve personnel each year. The grant is only one aspect, one factor of it. During periods of annual training and courses of instruction the rates of pay and allowances applicable to personnel of the Permanent Defence Force are paid and they qualify for increases granted to the normal Permanent Defence Force personnel. I can inform the Deputy also that the question of increasing these grants is being considered at present.

Thank you.

I hope I have dealt with most of the points raised by Deputies in the course of this debate. I want again to repeat my appreciation of the very sensible and valuable contributions made by Deputies. We will certainly consider any feasible and worthwhile recommendations. I look forward to the continued co-operation of all Deputies in the future.

Vote put and agreed to.
Top
Share