Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 30 Nov 1971

Vol. 257 No. 4

Committee on Finance. - Adjournment Debate: Citizens' Advice Bureaux.

On 25th November I asked the Minister for Social Welfare if he would arrange for the setting-up, in consultation with the health and local authorities, of a system of citizens' advice bureaux in all major centres of population. The Minister indicated that he was not convinced of the need for setting-up advice bureaux in relation to the social security service. He maintained that there was an information section in his Department to deal with general inquiries by telephone or letter.

He mentioned that the officer in charge of this section gives public lectures throughout the country to trade unions and voluntary groups. He said that personal callers are dealt with at two public offices in Dublin city, and that officers have been specially assigned to deal with inquiries at some employment exchanges, and information was also available from social welfare officers and local agents of the Department. He said that, in addition, printed information was available. In these circumstances, the Minister said he was not convinced of the need for setting up such a national service.

I raise this matter tonight because it is my experience, in my two-and-a-half years here, that far too great a proportion of a Deputy's time is taken up making inquiries and seeking information on behalf of constituents. Indeed, the role of Deputies and Senators is largely that of messenger boys. I regard this as scandalous. Many Deputies and Senators spend 75 per cent of their time dealing exclusively with enquiries about housing, health, social security, employment and so forth. Our role has been demeaned and abused and the danger is that our real role will become ineffective.

The rights and entitlements of citizens have been successfully made the subject of personal political patronage by those seeking votes in elections or in anticipation of elections. Fianna Fáil Deputies and Fianna Fáil local representatives have been, perhaps, the most assiduous cultivators of this, in my opinion, unhealthy anti-democratic climate. It is a climate that must be dispelled. Every effort must be made to eliminate this unique parliamentary characteristic from our society. One of the ways in which this can be done is by the establishment of citizens' advice bureaux in the major centres of population. The establishment of such bureaux would, I believe, engender in our citizens a greater interest in the public services available for all our citizens, public services which should be the concern of all our citizens. There is no greater threat to democracy than a feeling on the part of the ordinary citizen of bafflement, puzzlement and frustration because of ignorance of the meaning and scope of social and industrial legislation passed by this Oireachtas.

There is a need for properly staffed advice bureaux. Such bureaux could be assisted at local level by voluntary social workers. Today, the State, with an elaborate system of social services in education, health, housing, transport, planning and development, family allowances, pensions and consumer problems, such as hire purchase, impinges deeply on the life of every citizens. In whatever direction one may turn there is some statutory provision or regulation standing in one's way. Advice bureaux could, with advantage, reduce a great deal of frustration arising as a result of these regulations and provisions. First of all, the ordinary citizen could be made aware of the particular rules applying to his case; secondly, he could be made aware of the ways in which the application of a particular rule can be applied in his particular case; thirdly, he could be made aware of the services available for his assistance and how the rules must be applied to help him. All citizens should be made aware of the machinery for reviewing grievances. These bureaux would, I believe, make the work of government more meaningful and better understood by citizens. Citizens would have an opportunity, too, of voicing their criticisms of and suggestions for the improvement of the system.

I believe my proposal is in accordance with the highest aspirations of our society in regard to caring for the individual. Society is inevitably growing more and more bureaucratic and more concerned with the care of the community. It would be an important advance in social thinking and in political development if such bureaux were established. At present a great deal of laudable voluntary social work is being done by voluntary groups. These groups could play an important part in advice bureaux, an invaluable and an expanding role, and public servants and others would find their work greatly assisted. Such bureaux would be a major local co-ordinator and would develop a much more rational approach to social services of all kinds. Duplication and waste would be avoided. Ever since World War II such a system has operated in Britain. There are over 500 bureaux available at local level to British nationals which are staffed by trained professional people. There are at least 20 such bureaux currently operating in the North of Ireland which are providing an essential social service. Such bureaux should be set up in every major centre of population in the Republic.

During the course of my duties as a TD I am obliged, and I regard it as honour, to provide information and personal assistance to constituents. People do not always come because they are in a quandary about what social welfare benefits they are entitled to. They come very often in order to obtain comfort because of loneliness or personal social inadequacies. Voluntary workers could assist such people and find some form of community activity in which they could engage themselves.

In the growing consumer-orientated society in which we live such bureaux could provide an effective consumer service at local level. To take just one, hire purchase, this causes many problems to newly-married couples and old people. The value of such a public service is unquestionable.

When one looks at the documents and leaflets produced, including those produced by voluntary organisations such as the leaflets published by the Dún Laoghaire Junior Chamber of Commerce on Entitlements for Elderly Persons, one realises that such a service is necessary. It is not good enough to say that if people have inquiries they can ring up the Department. I know our telephone system has improved greatly and I know a great deal of information is available by telephone. I know too that people can go to employment exchanges and speak to local social welfare officers. In that way the majority of the staff of the Department of Social Welfare give help and assistance to citizens, but it is not good enough.

If such bureaux were set up in major urban centres of population people could find out about the services available in the Department of Health, the Department of Education, the Department of Social Welfare, the Department of Labour, the various local authorities and the many other Government Departments to which citizens have to go from time to time in order to find out their rights and their entitlements. If such bureaux were set up TDs would be able to spend more time as legislators, inventors of social reform and public watchdogs than they do at present because a good deal of our time is spent giving advice and assistance to citizens. At present we seem to spend a great deal of time writing letters, filling in forms and giving information to citizens, all of which is laudable, but it is not something we are employed to do as public representatives. I would ask, therefore, that such bureaux be established and if they are a failure at least we will have given them a say.

I thought I gave a fairly adequate answer to this question but obviously Deputy Desmond was anxious to pursue the matter further. If bureaux were established in every town in order to provide information not merely on social services, which covers a wide field in itself, but on education, health and agriculture, each bureau would need to be well staffed and in spite of the good that such bureaux would undoubtedly do, it would, in fact, be an overlapping service, and the cost would be tremendous.

Social welfare is the one area where people frequently talk about the necessity of providing facilities in order to let the public know what they are entitled to. I am as anxious as anyone else to have a good communications service with the public but from contact with my own constituents I have not found people are badly informed. I have found many people wondering how they can get a particular benefit even though they are not qualified for it and no bureau could provide such information. The person who is always seeking information is worried because he does not qualify for a particular scheme. As I mentioned on the Estimate debate one cannot have a scheme without laying down qualifications. We have not reached the stage of instant social services. It is not possible to go into an office and say: "Give me a £500 grant for my house" and walk off with it; or to say: "I was 70 years old yesterday and I want my pension book" and get it immediately. I know the Deputy is not suggesting anything like that although I admit that would be the ideal service. There are requirements laid down in order to qualify for any benefit. When a person reaches a stage where he knows he may be entitled to benefit he can make application and I think there is sufficient publicity to enable him to know where to apply for benefit.

We are anxious that everyone should know about the social welfare benefits and what they entail by way of qualification. However, if it is necessary for a person to have 156 contributions to qualify for a certain benefit and if he has only 155 no bureau can do anything about it. This is the kind of person who writes to the newspapers and who complains about the poor services we have.

We go to the trouble of issuing a booklet—which is changed each year —which is most useful. In itself the booklet is not an interpretation of the law with regard to social welfare. It gives a broad, simplified outline of the services available and it directs attention to more extensive information given in leaflets which set out full details in relation to each scheme. These booklets are freely distributed and Deputies make good use of them. I hope they circulate them to their constituents or to any person who may need them. The new revised booklet which refers to the most recent benefits will be available in a week or two and I hope it will be availed of to the same extent as have the previous booklets. I hope Deputies will not only get copies for themselves but for people who act as social workers, because these people do an excellent job.

In my reply to Deputy Desmond I pointed out that officers had been especially assigned recently to deal with inquiries at employment exchanges in six different offices—at Galway, Sligo, Athlone, Tralee, Wexford, and Drogheda and there is a fairly good service in Dublin. In addition, there is an employment exchange office in every area and the manager of each exchange is thoroughly versed in matters relating to social welfare. He will give guidance and advice to people but he cannot make decisions and this brings me to the important point regarding bureaux generally.

No matter how they are set up, as long as they cannot make decisions they do not serve a great purpose in that they can only direct the person where to go. They must be extremely circumspect about what they tell people and this applies also to bureaux in England. Incidentally, in that country the bureaux are, in the main, generally manned by voluntary workers. They can tell a person the requirements of qualification and even if they are of opinion that the person does not qualify for that benefit they can give him information about where to apply.

The service in England relates to many other items as well as social welfare; it relates to agricultural requirements, to schemes of grants, methods of education, to health services and many other items. I am not denying that it is useful and the bureaux are set up in a number of major cities. When I go abroad and meet representatives of other parliaments at conferences. usually we exchange views about matters of common interest. I find that no matter what service is set up, no matter what kind of communication is made available to help people obtain information, they do not fail to contact their elected representatives seeking advice and guidance and, frequently, expect us to do something that legally it is impossible to do. This communication has an advantage that it gives Members direct contact with thousands of people from all walks of life and this can be useful to a Deputy in building up his knowledge of what is good, bad and indifferent with regard to public administration. I am not saying that this kind of contact should constitute the major part of a legislator's duties but the time will never come when an elected representative will not be questioned by his constituents regarding many details of public administration. For that reason, I would not base any case for the establishment of these bureaux on the arguments that it would release Deputies to be legislators only. If that day should come we will have reached a stage when the elected representative will be remote from his people.

In addition to the booklet which my office produce and circulate free of charge, there is "The Guide to the Social Services" published by the Stationery Office, costing 5p. This booklet covers all types of services under 110 headings and it relates to various matters as well as social welfare; it makes reference to education, land, agriculture, fishing, to medical services and so on. In Britain a social services guide is circulated; it is issued by Pelican Publishers in paperback form and it covers very many schemes. However, it only touches on them by way of telling people what they might get and where to go, thereby demonstrating that they have the same problem as we have and that they are continually trying to issue publications to give people the necessary information.

As our social services become more complex and as they expand to take more people under the social welfare code more efficient communication is necessary. It is fair to say that we are endeavouring continually to improve the service and the fact that we have set up six exchanges in important towns is evidence of our recognition that, to some extent there is a problem. However, this service relates to social welfare only and to set up the kind of bureaux which have been advocated would require the co-operation of a number of Departments. It would need to be a highly skilled service with contacts throughout the country; it would need to be staffed by highly efficient people who would have at their fingertips knowledge relating to the various schemes, but these people would not be in a position to make decisions. Their function would be to inform the public about where to apply for benefits and to give them a broad outline of what is required with regard to qualifications.

I could not promise the Deputy that I would set out to have a proliferation of bureaux of this type but it would be interesting at some stage to have an experimental pilot scheme to see if it would be justifiable. My Department have been considering this but to do a worthwhile job it would have to embrace the workings of a number of Departments and it would require some inter-departmental study. Meanwhile, we will lose no opportunity of making available to the people in the easiest way possible all the information regarding our social welfare schemes.

The Dáil adjourned at 11 p.m. until 10.30 a.m. on Wednesday, 1st December, 1971.

Top
Share