Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 13 Jun 1972

Vol. 261 No. 8

Committee on Finance. - Vote 8: Public Works and Buildings (Resumed).

Debate resumed on the following motion:
That the Vote be referred back for reconsideration.
—(Deputy L'Estrange).

When I was speaking last week the last thing I dealt with was the Asgard and I should like now to add a few words to what I was then saying. As the House knows, the Asgard is under the control of a committee set up by the Minister for Finance. I went out of my way to congratulate them on the excellent job they are doing. The organisation of all sailing courses is a matter for that committee. As explained by the Minister for Finance in reply to a Parliamentary Question on 4th May, 1971, reported at columns 1020 and 1021 of the Official Report, the sailing programme was developed as a practical method of making use of the Asgard and there are no plans for the acquisition of a second vessel.

I should like to deal generally with national monuments which generated a great deal of interest during the course of the debate. Speaking on the same subject during the recent debate on the Supplementary Estimate for 1971-72, Deputy Tully requested information about the additional sum of £61,500 required to finance work on national monuments in that year. The additional amount arising from wage increases was approximately £7,000. This arose from the application of the Employer-Labour Conference and the national agreement in regard to craftsmen, to an increase of 5p per hour to the building trade and an increase in country money from £3.50 to £6 per week. The remainder was made up as follows: £29,500 to continue archaeological excavation at High Street and Winetavern Street. It had been hoped this expenditure would be met from the Vote for the Department of Education for the National Museum but as this was not feasible it was decided to continue to finance the excavations from the national monuments provision. A sum of £8,000 was required to complete the year's programme of archaeological research, including rescue operations at seven sites threatened with collapse, and £17,000 was required to complete the 1971-72 programme of conservation works on national monuments. This programme embraced some 80 monuments throughout the country.

Deputy Tully inquired about Knowth and Dowth. Dowth is open to the public and the key of the tumulus is obtainable from the caretaker who resides nearby. The large tumulus at Knowth has for long been known as the great site of the Brú na Bóinne passage grave cemetery. It is not an isolated structure but forms the hub of a complex of prehistoric tombs. The area in State care covers about six acres. Excavation, which has recommenced this season, has been in progress since 1962. It is hoped to open part of the monument to the public in 1973 following the execution of some conservation work.

Deputy L'Estrange inquired about the Donore Castle, Horseleap, Moate, County Westmeath. The castle is privately owned and I understand it was recently in the hands of an estate agent. If it were offered to the Commissioners of Public Works, together with a right of way for access by the public, the question of taking it in State care would certainly be considered.

Deputy Tunney expressed concern about the shop at Glendalough. I agree with Deputy Tunney's views on this matter. The whole question of the presentation of Glendalough, matters such as caretaking, access, and so on, is under review by the commissioners. The commissioners are looking into the entire question and I feel some alteration would need to be made.

Deputy Paudge Brennan raised two good points in regard to letting the public know the results of archaeological surveys and excavations. It is intended to publish the results of surveys in stages as work progresses. It is a condition of licences for archaeological excavations that reports of the results will be published and I am very happy to say that generally this condition has been observed. As I pointed out on the last occasion, these reports are sometimes so extensive that it is not possible for the national newspapers to reproduce them in full. Most newspapers, however, publish edited versions.

Deputy Kavanagh was concerned about Ratheen-a-Chluig Church on Bray Head. This was placed in the guardianship of the Commissioners of Public Works for preservation as a national monument by the Bray Urban District Council in 1926. It stands on land held not by the commissioners but by the UDC and it is maintained by them as a public park.

I do not think it is being maintained by anybody at present.

The arrangement we have with the council is that they maintain the public park and we maintain the building. Deputy Brennan spoke, as he does most years, on the burial ground at Glendalough. He made a suggestion in regard to the proposal to extend the burial ground there. Glendalough is a site of major national importance from the historic, architectural, archaeological and scenic points of view, and it is the intention to preserve not only the visual ancient monuments but also possibly hidden sites and amenities in the area. Burials at national monuments are not regarded today as being in keeping with the proper care and presentation of monuments of outstanding merit. As Parliamentary Secretary in charge of this State organisation, charged with statutory responsibility to preserve national monuments and their amenities, I must uphold this position. Any further extension granted would last for only a very limited time and, as has been the experience to date, would in due course lead to further agitation for further extensions.

I would point out that our proposals in regard to Glendalough are not niggardly. The existing burials there are not helpful to any proper presentation of the national monuments and any extension of that would be regarded as inexcusable. Personally I am sympathetic with Deputy Brennan's suggestion but in the circumstances I hope he will understand that in the case of such an important national monument I feel obliged to uphold the views of the commissioners.

Deputy Crotty raised the matter of a railing at Kilkenny Castle which he said is unsafe. A guard to be mounted on this railing has been designed. It will make it safer and I hope to have it set very shortly.

Deputy Cooney spoke about plaques which he said should be affixed to national monuments to explain their history. During the debate on my last Estimate I said it was my intention to do this. The first consignment of plaques has been received and the plaques will be affixed to the monuments in the next few months. I share the Deputy's concern that some of our national monuments do not have rights of way to enable the public to visit them easily. This is a matter which I am looking into. In many cases we must rely largely on co-operation by the local authorities.

Deputy Coughlan spoke at some length about King John's Castle in Limerick and I should like to recount some of the background in relation to this monument. In November last Limerick Corporation wrote to the commissioners that an application for full planning permission for the construction of a function building had been received from the Shannon Free Airport Development Company Limited, who forwarded the relevant drawings and specifications. The Commissioners sent the drawings and specifications to the National Monuments Advisory Council for advice and observations and informed the corporation accordingly. The developers were advised at the same time of the functions of the National Monuments Advisory Council in the matter and of the action that had been taken by the commissioners.

Having examined the proposals, the National Monuments Advisory Council in December, 1971, wrote to Limerick Corporation pointing out that they considered the scheme undesirable in some respects and indicating that they would be prepared to discuss the matter and possible alternative proposals with the developers. I understand the National Monuments Advisory Council have not received a reply to that letter from Limerick Corporation. I would remind the Deputy that the Council is an independent body appointed by the Minister for Finance under the National Monuments Acts and is also a prescribed body under the Planning Acts. I think it unfair of Deputy Coughlan to abuse the Office of Public Works in this matter when the lack of progress in this case is entirely the responsibility of Limerick Corporation. The National Monuments Advisory Council are awaiting a reply to their letter of December, 1971.

With regard to St. Patrick's Cathedral in Dublin and other churches, they are excluded from the operations of the National Monuments Acts. For example, the restoration of Holy Cross required a special Act of this Parliament and restoration work is being carried out on a diocesan basis. Any money advanced is refunded and we will conserve the building when reconstruction is completed.

Deputy Burke inquired about St. Colmcille's Church, Swords, and was anxious that it be re-roofed. Unfortunately, the commissioners do not restore national monuments—they merely conserve them. In the case of St. Colmcille's Church, there is a possibility that local interests may be prepared to put up the money required for restoration, over and above the costs of conservation. The Commissioners of Public Works are prepared to consider carrying out restoration work on a repayment basis for the local interests. In fact, I understand a sum of money has been raised.

In reply to Sir Anthony Esmonde, the Guide to the National Monuments of Ireland by Harbison is the only book of its kind now available for purchase. It has been widely praised and, in my opinion, it is a first class production.

In reply to Deputy Treacy, local authorities are bound under the National Monuments Acts to maintain national monuments of which they are the owners. In present circumstances it would not be feasible for the Commissioners of Public Works to ensure that each local authority honour their responsibilities. It is up to public representatives to see that they do. The National Parks and Monuments Branch is prepared to give advice to a local authority when asked. Lists of the more important national monuments for the different areas were furnished to local authorities by the National Monuments Advisory Council.

Deputy Treacy's interest in the restoration of the Standing Stone at Cullen is appreciated. I regret it has not been found possible, because of prior commitments, to arrange for the archaeological excavation of the site which I am advised is necessary before re-erecting the stone. The matter is not being overlooked and the excavation work will be undertaken at the earliest possible opportunity.

Deputy L'Estrange was concerned about grave slabs. Conservation of ancient grave slabs by the commissioners is feasible if the graveyard concerned is in their care. The majority of graveyards are in the care of local authorities. A case in point is the graveyard at Ballynakill near Killashee, County Longford, which contains a number of early Christian grave slabs. Local authorities have power under the National Monuments Acts to maintain and protect national monuments in their care. Under section 22 of the National Monuments Act, 1930, they may establish an advisory committee to give them advice and assistance in relation to the protection and preservation of national monuments within their functional areas. The National Monuments Acts provide that where the local authority are the owners of the national monument they shall maintain it. I should like to see local authorities and private persons and groups taking a more active part in the preservation of our ancient monuments. The National Parks and Monuments Branch have a backlog of work in relation to monuments in their care, and there is still a considerable number of monuments not in the care either of the State or local authorities.

Deputy L'Estrange complained that archaeological earthworks are disappearing at an alarming rate in County Westmeath and that they are not being excavated or even recorded before they are destroyed. He suggested that the law should require a person to obtain permission from the Office of Public Works before interfering with any archaeological remains. I share the Deputy's concern in this matter. Not only in County Westmeath but throughout the country these relics of the past are being destroyed and obliterated at an increasing rate. I await the view of the National Monuments Advisory Council on certain proposals which have been put forward tentatively for amendment of the National Monuments Acts to meet the threats and problems of the present day. In due course I expect to bring legislative proposals before the Oireachtas. However, it is evident, as pointed out by Deputy Tully and Deputy L'Estrange, that without an interested, informed and vigilant public much of our ancient heritage will continue to be destroyed. I am glad to hear that voluntary organisations are active in County Westmeath in the protection and preservation of monuments. With the passage of time their efforts will be even more appreciated. Once a relic of the past is destroyed it can never be replaced.

As a matter of interest, I should like to tell Deputies that this year we have taken charge of eight monuments. On 10th March we took charge of a ringfort at Croom, County Limerick; on 27th April, we took charge of a ringfort at Taghmon, County Westmeath; on the same date we took charge of a moated house site at Corboy, Killoe, County Longford, and three ritual sites in the parish of Denn, Cavan. It is difficult to take charge of the many monuments but little by little we are doing our best to maintain as many monuments as possible.

Deputy Hogan O'Higgins alleged that we proposed to spend a sum of between £20,000 to £30,000 on the construction of a small Garda station at Bookeen. These figures are not correct. The proposal is to build a station unit and house at Kiltulla, near Bookeen, at a cost of about £10,000.

Regarding Deputy McLaughlin's inquiry in respect of Sligo garda station, tenders were invited for a scheme of improvements to this station but as an acceptable one was not received tenders have been reinvited. These are due on 15th June.

Deputy Tully referred to Item No. 62 in the Estimate, that is, the provision of storage accommodation for departmental records, et cetera, in the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries. The Deputy was anxious to know what is involved here. The idea is to provide a cheap industrial-type building with a small office at Thorndale, Drumcondra, to house documents and various publications of the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries and thereby avoid the necessity of using valuable office space in the new building at Kildare Place. Deputy Tully mentioned also the expenditure of £380,000 on the new office block in Kildare Place. The fitting out here includes partitioning, floor covering, lighting and furnishing. It should be remembered that there is a staff of approximately 1,500 people involved.

Deputy McMahon raised some questions regarding Tallaght. I can tell him that we are building a new telephone exchange there at the moment. Apparently, the Deputy is not aware of this. Also, provision has been made in the Estimate for this work by the Department of Posts and Telegraphs. The same Deputy was concerned about the matter of national school facilities at Tallaght. The position is that tenders for the provision of a permanent school have been invited by the manager's architect and are due on the 27th June, 1972.

Deputy Coughlan expressed concern regarding the conditions of employment in the Office of Public Works. He said that although a number of people have been employed by the Office for between five and 20 years they are still temporary and are not entitled to pensions. I am not clear as to what particular employees the Deputy has in mind, but if he will let me have the details I will look into the matter.

Deputy Coughlan suggested also that regarding the purchase of furniture we have to buy through combined purchasing sections at fixed prices. I would like to reply to that by saying that, with the exception of a few items, notably typists's chairs, we do not buy in this way. For the great bulk of requirements competitive tenders are invited and all suitably equipped and competent furniture manufacturers can tender. The Deputy was critical of the condition of rural garda stations and the amount of fuel supplied for heating them. Deputy Begtey was on this line also. We have done and are doing a lot in the matter of the erection of new rural stations and in improving existing stations. Repairs are carried out by contract and except for very small jobs at least three tenders are asked for. In the case of bigger jobs the tenders are invited by public advertisement. The Office of Public Works are not responsible for the supply of fuel to garda stations.

There was mention, too, of the publication, Oibre. I think that everyone will have received his copy a week or so ago. We intend to continue this publication. The current issue was a little late being published, but when there is much pressure of work, one cannot expect people to complete articles of that sort to the neglect of the services provided by the Office as a whole. We hope that the next edition will be available in good time.

Deputy Hogan-O'Higgins referred to Ruan national school in County Clare. This school, which is more than 100 years old, is scheduled for replacement by a new central school to replace it and Kells national school. A sketch scheme together with an estimate of the cost of the proposed central school has been prepared and furnished to the Department of Education preparatory to the sanctioning of a grant. A scheme of improvements at the old school at Ruan consisting of the provision of w.c's, electric heating and the surfacing of the school yard was completed within the past two years. The Deputy referred also to Tubber national school in County Clare.

A grant has been sanctioned towards the cost of an improvement scheme at this school which includes the provision of water-flushed sanitation system works and tarmacadam resurfacing of the yard. Clare County Council intimated within the past few weeks that a public water supply should be available there in about 12 months time. In the meantime the manager has been supplied with details to enable him to proceed with the remainder of the work covered by the scheme.

Deputy Tully inquired as to what is the item referred to in the Estimate as balance of expenditure. This is item 86 in the Estimate and is a more compressed description, which was used also in 1971-72, of expenditure formerly—(1970-71)—described as balance of expenditure not provided for above and works of the previous years which may not be complete on 1st April. I think the old description was clearer and I have arranged to have it resumed next year.

Deputy L'Estrange was critical of the lack of up-to-date toilet facilities in some primary schools. I share the Deputy's wish that modern facilities would be available in all our primary schools and we shall spare no effort in that respect. However, there is a scheme whereby in respect of schools that are not to be replaced within a short period, the manager may proceed to provide these facilities without any reference to the Office of Public Works. When the work is complete the bill is sent to us and we pay the costs provided, of course, the work is carried out satisfactorily. The same Deputy said he had received some complaints regarding delays on our part in paying small contractors. We pay as quickly as possible and in recent years we have improved in this respect. In very many cases delays are caused by the inability, or by difficulty on the part of contractors, to furnish the full documentation that is required in support of claims. Also, there have been cases in which we have paid the contractors, but where the contractors have not paid the sub-contractors. Perhaps the Deputy's anxiety arose from matters of this kind, but I can assure him that there is no unreasonable delay on our part in paying any contractors provided the necessary documentation is supplied.

Deputy L'Estrange suggested also that the Office of Public Works should borrow money from insurance companies with which to build their own office accommodation. In this respect I would refer the Deputy to the statement in this regard in my introductory speech and point out that this whole question of office accommodation is under active review at present.

Deputy Coogan raised the matter of Rossaveel, but I dealt with that last week by way of Parliamentary question. Deputy Byrne suggested that a naval vessel should accompany our sailing teams to the Olympics. Of course this would be a matter for the Minister for Defence because we have no control over naval vessels. The same Deputy suggested that we should have a speakers' corner in Dublin rather than having what is now the traditional corner at Middle Abbey Street. I have thought about this a few times and under no circumstances could I approve of having this type of facility provided in St. Stephen's Green because it would be ruinous to the amenities there. Such a facility, though, could be provided in the Phoenix Park but when we suggested this venue, the people who were looking for the facility did not approve of the park because they did not consider it to be central enough.

There are only dumb cattle there.

There are not as many of them either as there were. Deputy Andrews referred to the provision of £10,000 for, as he said, the removal of the last obstacle on the East Pier. That is not entirely correct. In carrying out the undertaking given by Deputy Childers when he was Minister for Transport and Power to restore the east pier we decided to do so in three stages. The first stage was the removal of the buildings on the pier. These have gone. The next stage is the removal of the bridge and the synchro lift. When the second stage is completed, we will look at it and consult local interests to see whether complete restoration will be favoured by them at that time. I understand that the work on the removal of the bridge and the synchro lift will start in the very near future.

Deputy O'Leary was concerned about a priority list for fishery landing places. The Office of Public Works have completed surveys of all landing places on the south-western and western seaboard. The surveys have been sent to the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries. That Department will decide the priorities. We have made some recommendations but the final decision must be taken by them. We will carry out whatever works they direct us to do.

Deputy O'Leary was also concerned about Beaufort Garda Station. Tenders for a scheme of improvement with complete internal and external painting have been invited and are due on 22nd June. He was also concerned about the primary school accommodation in Killarney, County Kerry. It is proposed to provide two new primary schools in the town, one consisting of 14 classrooms and a general purpose room in the existing Convent of Mercy grounds, and the other consisting of ten classrooms and a general purpose room on the eastern side of the town. The manager of the two schools was asked by the Department of Education on 18th March, 1971, to have sketch plans for each school prepared by his architect and to furnish evidence of title to the sites. The sketch plans have not yet been submitted and, until they are, I am afraid no progress can be made.

Deputy Smith was concerned about Cloughjordan Church of Ireland national school, County Tipperary. A grant has been sanctioned for the provision of a new Church of Ireland national school at Cloughjordan. Planning permission was received in April, 1972, subject to certain conditions. These conditions are complicated and are being examined at present. As soon as they have been cleared, and the matter of the extension of the public water supply settled, the preparation of working drawings and specifications will be put in hand.

Deputy Smith was also concerned about Roscrea Church of Ireland national school, County Tipperary. Working drawings and specifications are almost completed and when they are completed they will be sent to the county council, as usual, for planning approval.

Deputy Coughlan inquired about the harbour improvements in Kilkee and White Strand, County Clare. I should like to inform the Deputy that these improvements which are in the fishing interests only will be carried out very shortly.

A question was raised about the removal of a crane at Killybegs. I think it is better to leave that until tomorrow because there is a question on the Order Paper about it. As far as I know the crane is on the way back to where it came from. It was needed in Killala for a week or two. I will deal with that in more detail tomorrow.

Deputy Begley, Deputy O'Leary and Deputy Donegan referred to the need for an extension of coast protection work. There is an increase in the provision for these services compared with last year. I should like to see an even greater provision for these important works. According as new schemes are prepared more money will have to be provided. I expect that we will see an extension to this work pretty soon.

Specifically on coast protection again, Deputy McLaughlin inquired about coast protection in County Sligo. Proposals under the Coast Protection Act, 1963, have been received by the Commissioners of Public Works from Sligo County Council for the following locations: Strandhill; we received the proposal in March, 1966; the proposal in relation to Enniscrone was received in February, 1969; and the proposal in relation to Mullaghmore was received in July, 1970. Work on the Strandhill scheme is expected to start in mid-July, 1972. In relation to Enniscrone a preliminary examination has been carried out and a report and estimate will shortly be sent to the county council. In relation to Mullaghmore an examination has not yet been carried out owing to other coast protection commitments.

Deputy Kavanagh wants the area around Brittas Bay investigated under the Coast Protection Act, 1963. The Act specifically lays down that responsibility for promoting proposals rests with the local authority, in this case the Wicklow County Council. No proposal has been received for coast protection work in the Brittas Bay area.

Deputy Brennan commented on the delay that occurs in carrying out coast protection work and I am aware of this but because of the protracted procedure required by the Act it is inevitable. I am trying to get an accelerated programme for coast protection within the resources of money and staff available.

Deputy Lenehan wants me to come on tour with him in his area to look at some matters he complained about. I will be glad to take him up on that at any time. I have no doubt that I would have a pleasant time investigating these matters.

A most exhilarating and exciting time. The Parliamentary Secretary would need a week to recover when he came back.

Deputy Begley was concerned about Dingle drainage and about the pier. I answered a Parliamentary question on that last week. The position is not satisfactory. We are not happy with it. If the contractor does not start on the pier within a week we will seek legal advice on what remedy we can find for this matter.

There was also a question about car parks at national monuments. Some 20 national monuments are now being catered for specially in regard to books and car parks and other amenities. We get great co-operation from Bord Fáilte.

I should like to add a little to what I said about Dingle harbour about which Deputy Begley is so concerned. The scheme at present being carried out at Dingle is based on the report of a study team set up by the Minister for Agriculture and Fisheries to examine fully the fishing harbour position in Kerry. The team consisted of nominees from the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Roinn na Gaeltachta, An Bord Iascaigh Mhara, the Office of Public Works and Kerry County Council. The team's recommendation for Dingle harbour is as follows: (1) Dredging of the berths to accommodate 56-footers drawing up to six feet six inches to be undertaken; (2) the approach channel to be dredged to a depth of about five feet, it being more important for boats to have floatation in the berths, since the navigation of the channel can, without too much hardship, be accommodated to the tides. The present scheme will provide navigation depths of five feet in the channel at mean low water spring tide and seven feet six inches in the berths.

I have a letter from the contractors. As I said we have not been entirely satisfied. I will quote a small part of the letter:

We made arrangements for supplementary plant in February last and subsequently were led to believe that it would be made available at Dingle at the end of March. Arrangements for the voyage and transfer to Dingle, together with certain modifications, took far longer than anticipated and the craft eventually left Southampton for Dingle on 2nd May. Unfortunately, a defect developed during the voyage and it was necessary to return to Falmouth for repairs, which were expeditiously carried out within a few days. Since then weather and sea conditions have prevented departure and a suitable forecast is still awaiting.

That was dated 5th June. That supplementary equipment has not yet arrived.

We had some remarks about the proposal to install instant translation equipment here. I should like to make it quite clear that any matter concerning the House is not a matter, in the first instance, for the Office of Public Works. We are merely implementing a decision of the Committee on Procedure and Privileges. We expect to provide this equipment during the Summer Recess. I was surprised by the remarks of the Parliamentary Secretary to the Taoiseach, Deputy Andrews, Deputy Fitzpatrick and Deputy Byrne in relation to the interview room. Two years ago that room was in a rather ugly condition. There were cubicles which were not sound-proofed and which did not offer any great degree of privacy. In consultation with the authorities here, I decided that the room should be restored. From an aesthetic point of view I am sure everyone would agree this was the proper decision.

Deputies complain that the facilities are not adequate for confidential interviews. I throw my mind back to when I first came in here in 1956-57 before the new block was built and I am wondering just how Deputies managed then. We now have the new six-storey block. I do not remember hearing complaints before that block was built. I have some thoughts as to how we might get some private accommodation for the use of Deputies, but I think it will be very, very difficult. It will be at the expense of something else. I should not like to interfere with the present room because it is a beautiful room. When I was an ordinary Deputy it was only on rare occasions I had to, so to speak, lock myself away somewhere for a very confidential interview with a constituent. There was always somewhere. There was the Seanad anteroom and Room 114. However, I will have a look into the complaints made and have a chat with the architect to see if anything can be done.

Deputy O.J. Flanagan referred to the signposting of the roads to Clonmacnoise. My information is that Bord Fáilte have signposted all the roads. As far as Béal-na-Bláth is concerned, this is private property and the State cannot carry out any works of maintenance there.

Deputy O.J. Flanagan referred to the courtesy shown him by the officials of the Office of Public Works. He also suggested that there was some lack of efficiency. I should like to ask him how he can reconcile that with what I put on record here on 26th November, 1970.

About half a dozen years ago we employed management consultants and, as a result of reorganisation carried out on their advice, we have a much more efficient service and we have effected a saving in the region of £50,000 a year. We get an average of 750 requisitions for work each week, involving as many as 13 different skills; these works have to be done in a variety of different sequences in about 500 buildings in Dublin.

To my mind, it takes a pretty good organisation to meet that requirement.

With regard to Deputy Mrs. Hogan O'Higgins's plea that a shower should be provided for the ladies, this matter is being examined. We believe we have a possible location, provided there is no objection from Members.

Temperature is a hardy annual. The new office block is air-conditioned and controlled automatically to give a temperature and relative humidity suitable to most people. It is not possible to vary conditions for individual rooms. Some favour conditions which the majority do not favour. The balance of Leinster House is heated by hot water radiators. Some have been in operation for many years. Some have been installed in recent years following on structural alterations carried out when the new block was completed. There was no temperature or humidity control provided. The possibility of having thermostatic valves on these radiators is being examined. I understand the benefit would be limited. The Dáil Chamber is heated by warm air——

And hot air as well.

——and provided with extractor fans to provide adequate fresh air. This system is not controlled thermostatically, but a careful watch is kept during sittings and suitable adjustments are made to prevent excessive temperatures. The Chamber can become excessively hot during the summer months. This occurs on only a few days. No cooling facilities are available. The provision of air conditioning would be feasible, but it would be a complex and costly operation. It is open to question whether it would be advisable.

Deputy Tunney and Deputy Mrs. Hogan O'Higgins raised the question of putting names on the portraits in Leinster House. This is a good idea, but it is again a matter in the first instance for the Committee on Procedure and Privileges. I will bring the suggestion to the notice of the committee.

Will it take as long as it has taken to produce permanent notices indicating the purpose for which individual rooms are used? Paper and cardboard notices are hardly in keeping with the dignity of the House.

I do not know if we have made provision for that, but I will make a note of it now.

I was told years ago they were on order.

That could be so. A number of Deputies referred to the proposed extension of the protective screen in the public gallery. I do not think we need any protection but, again, this is a matter for the Committee on Procedure and Privileges. I shall have the views expressed by many Deputies here again brought to the attention of that committee.

Deputy Tully wanted to know what had happened about the proposed dust extractor at the Sherriff Street sorting office. Post and Telegraphs engineers are at present preparing drawings and specifications for a complete ventilating system in the sorting office which will provide clear, conditioned air throughout the building. The Office of Public Works are looking after necessary building works and as some of the work has to be carried out during the off-heating season, it may be spread over about two years. Deputy Kavanagh referred to the increases imposed on rents payable by tenants of the former coastguard cottages at Greystones. These cottages had been let at rents which at present day value were altogether uneconomic and the commissioners were constrained to increase them to bring them into line with current values. However, even the increased rents of £70 per annum or £1.35 a week are very reasonable and three of the five tenants are paying them. As the previous rents did not contain any element for the supply of water, it cannot be said to be unfair if each tenant is being required to pay for the water consumed on his premises.

What would the Parliamentary Secretary say about selling these houses to the tenants if they wished to buy them?

I understand we are trying to buy out the head rents and when we do this we will sell.

The purchase of the head rents has gone on for a very long time now.

I understand we have now agreed on a figure and it should not go on much longer.

Deputy O'Connell made what I regard as a very serious allegation, that officials of the Office of Public Works compelled a cleaner employed in that office to have an advertisement published dissociating herself from the Labour Party. So far as my inquiries have gone they show the allegation is completely without foundation. I suggest the Deputy should check whatever information he got on the matter and then come back to the House either to substantiate or withdraw his allegation. He also spoke about political patronage for jobs and suggested we should use the employment exchanges. He has a question on today's Order Paper about this and I shall deal with it tomorrow. The point is that we only employ people through employment exchanges or, in the case of Dublin, the National Manpower Agency. Nobody can be employed by the Office of Public Works except in very rare cases of people with special skill unless they come through these agencies. He also suggested that the form we send out to people seeking employment involves some form of patronage. It reads:

Oifig na nOibreacha Poiblí

Application for Employment

Name .................................................................................................

Address ............................................................................................

Age ....................................................................................................

Married or Single .............................................................................

Dependants ......................................................................................

Are you in receipt of Unemployment Assistance?

............................................................................................................

If so, how much? .............................................................................

Regd. No. at Emp. Exchange ..........................................................

Type of work required ....................................................................

Special Experience (if any) .............................................................

.............................................................................................................

Particulars of Past Employment .....................................................

.............................................................................................................

Recommended by ............................................................................

Give particulars of service with the Army or with the Old IRA

.............................................................................................................

Any other information ....................................................................

.............................................................................................................

I do not see why Deputy O'Connell objects to that form. It is the method which has been used by Parliamentary Secretaries before me. I am not sure whether every Parliamentary Secretary used it but if one is employing people or is recommending people for employment anywhere, and not necessarily to the Office of Public Works, this is the information that would be required.

The Deputy was also concerned about the site for the computer station at Inchicore Road. This site was actually examined to see if it could be utilised for any other purpose such as an open space but, as the Deputy himself said, you have Inchicore Road on one side, which is a most dangerous road. The Deputy has raised this time and again. On the other side, there is the dual carriageway with its very fast traffic. I know that some Deputies or, perhaps, some local people suggested that this site should be made into an open space for children to play in but we concluded it would be most dangerous to locate a children's playground with dangerous roads on each side of it. A third side is now used to convey heavy commercial traffic and for these reasons we felt that the building was desirable there. In any case, if children in the area want it, there is an open space just across the road in Memorial Park which is a very lovely park and this should relieve the pressure of demand for an extra playground in the area.

Deputy O'Connell also complained about an architect being refused access to the Royal Hospital, Kilmainham. I have so far been unable to obtain details of this but one point which immediately occurs to me is: what is the purpose of the proposed inspection? The commissioners' architects are thoroughly familiar with the condition of the building and inspection by outsiders would not add one iota to that. Briefly, the position is that three of the four wings of the almost 300 year-old building are, because of age and the effects of woodworm and dry rot, in such defective condition that they will have to be gutted and completely restored. The task is one of very great proportions and will cost a very great deal of money. The plans for restoration are in hands and I hope by the time the Estimates for 1973-74 are introduced I shall be able to give a firm estimate of when the works will commence. The provision in this year's Estimate is for the preparatory work. Indeed, I was very anxious to open up the very lovely gardens there to the public but I am advised it would be dangerous to allow the public in on account of the condition of the building.

Will the Parliamentary Secretary allow the architect in for a second opinion?

I think it is unnecessary but if the Deputy can give me any good reasons——

What harm could he do?

He might not do any harm but what good could he do? I should also point out in regard to the computer station that the planning authority was consulted before this decision was taken.

Deputy Byrne asked questions about the Kennedy Memorial Hall, where it was to be sited and on what the £117,000 was spent. It was spent almost entirely on fees. He was also concerned about Chapelizod Garda station adjoining the park. The disposal of this property was decided on as a matter of policy and the Board of Works were not concerned. The condition of the playing pitches was raised by Deputy L'Estrange. Deputies Tunney and Mrs. Hogan O'Higgins and Deputy O'Connell were also concerned about cattle. Deputy Tunney mentioned commercial vehicles and suggested a motor cycle patrol.

I am aware of the present poor condition of many of the playing pitches in the Park. The need for resting the pitches, re-seeding or re-sodding is being considered. Preliminary discussions have taken place with the representatives of the GAA and talks will also be arranged with the FAI. The whole question of horse-riding is under review and we have informed the various riding establishments that it will be necessary to amend the byelaws relating to horse-riding. We have invited their observations on such matters as confining horses to special bridle paths, limiting time of access, payment of a fee and so forth. The replies received are being studied. We also expect that the report of the Bolton Street architectural students which is due to be presented next month will include some recommendations about horse-riding.

Regarding commercial vehicles, licences are issued to firms who have deliveries to make to buildings within the park. They are not entitled to use the park as a through route for business outside the park but it is believed that many of them are doing so. One way of curbing this would be to require all commercial vehicles to halt at the entrance gates for checking of delivery dockets and this will be examined. Notices will also be erected at all the gates to the effect that commercial vehicles are prohibited without a permit. The question of introducing radio controlled motor cycle patrols is also being examined. A promise has been made to the Workers Union of Ireland that we will discuss any such scheme with them in advance. Motor cycle patrols should help to combat excessive speeding as well as unauthorised entry by commercial vehicles.

The question of a public golf course in the Phoenix Park extension was raised by a number of Deputies. I appreciate their support for the project. The proposals involved an appreciable amount of investigation and consideration to resolve the financial and other implications. As I announced recently, agreement has now been reached with all parties affected and sanction has been obtained to proceed with the provision of nine holes initially. I hope that the preliminary work will commence very shortly but we still have to select from the projected 18 hole course the nine holes which can most advantageously be developed, bearing in mind the ultimate aim of a full 18 hole course. To this end we are obtaining the best advice available. As well as providing a welcome addition to the recreational facilities available to the general public, I am not unmindful of the fact that in doing so we will enhance the amenities of the Phoenix Park and improve the aesthetic appearance of this important approach to the capital city from the west.

With regard to the St. Stephen's Green Park, Deputy Seán Moore suggested that there was need for more amenities for children there. The present playground was provided within the last two years and present indications are that it is reasonably adequate in size to meet normal demands. Although the playground is intended for children under 12 years of age, groups of older boys and girls have been congregating in the area and using the play equipment to the exclusion of the children. Parents have complained to us about the language and the general behaviour of these groups. When it became clear that even the supervision of the park ranger was proving ineffective it was decided to rail off the playground. This has been done and only young children and accompanying adults will be allowed inside the enclosure. The new railing will be screened by suitable trees and shrubs. This is a problem which is common in most public parks and the answer may be the provision of facilities suitable for older children. I will have this matter examined. St. Stephen's Green is already intensively used for general relaxation and more leisurely forms of recreation. There may not be much scope for further development.

In recent times we have had some difficulty from some people who are described as skinheads. I should like to congratulate the park staff as a whole. One of the constables apprehended five of these youths and when they attempted to struggle with him all the park staff, including gardeners, sweepers and labourers, came to his assistance and these five young thugs were apprehended. I will say, however, that there was considerable delay in the arrival of the Garda. I have brought the matter to the notice of the Minister for Justice and I understand that there will be greater co-operation between the park constables and the Garda in future.

I appreciate Deputy Moore's concern about the need for more public parks for the citizens of the Greater Dublin region but he will, I am sure, realise that this is primarily the function of the local authorities. Both Dublin Corporation and the county council have been devoting increased resources to this work in recent years. It is not always easy to acquire enough suitable land in the right areas to cater for the needs of an evergrowing population.

Apart from urban or semi-urban parks, there is undoubtedly need to develop more extensive open air facilities beyond the city environment but within a reasonable car or bus ride of the metropolis. Dublin is exceptionally fortunate in having on its doorstep an area of such outstanding beauty and amenity potential as the Dublin-Wicklow mountains. The Department of Lands has been doing very valuable work in recent years in opening a number of its forests to the public, providing car parks and picnic facilities and laying out nature trails. There is scope for further development of this kind as more of our State forests reach maturity.

Dublin and Wicklow County Councils have been exploring the possibility of establishing a park something on the lines of the regional parks to be found in England and Wales and they have been in touch with the National Parks and Monuments Branch who have themselves been sponsoring a pilot study of this kind elsewhere. The success of such a project would depend largely on the extent to which various public bodies could co-operate within an overall plan. It is hoped that the pilot study at present in hands will help in devising a form of administrative machinery for co-ordinating the work of such bodies. The bodies I have in mind would be the local authorities, Bord Fáilte, the Department of Lands, the Department of Local Government, CIE and the National Parks and Monuments Branch of the Office of Public Works as well as farming organisations, community and development associations. Such a scheme could, I hope, serve as a blue print for similar parks elsewhere in the country, such as the Lee Valley and the Boyne Valley.

Deputy L'Estrange raised the question of pony trekking in the Bourn Vincent Memorial Park. Bord Fáilte have acquired a strip of land around portion of the Killarney Lakes which they propose to make available for pony trekking. The question of extending the track through the national park or other areas is under consideration by the National Parks and Monuments Branch in consultation with Bord Fáilte and the local authority.

Tentative proposals have been formulated for additional parks which would be regarded as national parks in the internationally accepted sense of the term. As progress is made I will announce it.

A pilot study has also been undertaken in conjunction with Bord Fáilte, An Foras Forbartha and a local authority to identify the problems involved in the creation in this country of regional parks in areas of importance from the scenic, historic, scientific and archaeological points of view, where the bulk of the land would continue to remain in private ownership.

Again in regard to the Bourn Vincent Memorial Park, I should like to point out that three nature trails have been established and are proving a great attraction. We are now considering the next step and one of our recently appointed naturalists is working on the proposal. The purpose is to use our parks as an aid to education and to enable people to make better use of leisure time which, as Deputy L'Estrange mentioned, is growing. A better understanding by our young people of the wonders of nature, which so many of us take for granted, would also help considerably to counter the worldwide problem of vandalism.

In conclusion I should like to refer to a matter with which Deputy Dowling was more concerned than anybody else. It is the access facilities for disabled persons to public buildings. I introduced a code in this respect last February. Deputies Dowling and Andrews were concerned that there should be easier access for disabled persons to this House and to the Public Gallery. I can see some difficulties arising here and the code of instruction to which I have referred might prove to be inadequate. We must wait for a time to see how it works.

Until recently, few buildings were designed to meet the special requirements of disabled people and existing buildings are often difficult and even impossible for disabled people to enter and to use. Consequently, many of these people are handicapped not only physically but socially and economically as well. It is of particular importance that public buildings should not put barriers in the way of the disabled, and it is the policy of the Office of Public Works that in future all of their buildings should be designed to be usable by disabled people. It should be noted that compliance with the code would improve the conveniences of any building for non-disabled users also. It would help reduce accident hazards because it covers such things as the approach to a building, doors, internal staircases, telephones, fittings, switches and controls, sign-posting, lifts, floor levels, hazards, pavements, corridors, external staircases, sanitary and lavatory accommodation. If any Deputy wants a copy of this code, I would be only too glad to let him have it.

I should like to refer to the possible siting of the Kennedy Memorial Hall in Phoenix Park. The Parliamentary Secretary did not say this was being considered. Many people would be relieved to get an assurance that it would not be in the park.

The position is that the final decision will be taken by an all-party committee. What the Minister is thinking on the matter I do not know. I would say that what has been published in the newspapers is speculation. We in the Office of Public Works have not been asked to prepare any plans in relation to such a hall in the park.

What is the Parliamentary Secretary's intention?

My idea was Raheny Park.

What is the possibility of the policy in regard to drainage being extended in view of our entry to Europe and the importance of land to farmers?

I was very careful in my remarks last week to point out that the whole question of arterial drainage is under examination. What I hope to do is to demonstrate to the Government either that they are getting a good return for capital investment or alternatively to satisfy them that the low priority it now has is justified.

It is not fair to be asking the Parliamentary Secretary to commit his successor.

Motion, by leave, withdrawn.
Vote put and agreed to.
Top
Share