Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 24 Jul 1973

Vol. 267 No. 10

Committee on Finance. - Adjournment Debate: Dumping of Waste Materials.

I thank you, Sir, for giving me the opportunity to raise this matter on the Adjournment. It arises out of questions put by other Deputies and by me today to the Minister for Local Government in connection with the probability of dumping at sea by a Danish firm. My question was to ask the Minister for Local Government what action, if any, he has taken to ensure that chemicals being dumped at sea by a Danish firm will not pollute or destroy living matter within Irish fishery limits. I also asked him if he would make a general statement in the matter.

One does not raise matters on the Adjournment lightly, but in view of the reply of the Minister for Finance, I understand on behalf of the Minister for Foreign Affairs, in view of the sketchy reply he gave, I am raising this matter now. There were too many questions left unanswered in the Minister's reply when the Private Notice Questions were answered after Question Time proper today. For instance, there is a commercial firm, obviously with the permission of the Danish Government, about to dump certain chemicals some 200 miles off our southern coast, and I am asking the Minister to whom did the Danish Government bring this request, to whose attention did the Danish Government bring the request in connection with the dumping of these chemicals. Did, for instance, the Danish Government apply to the Irish Government for permission to dump the chemicals off our coast — I accept they are international waters. Will the Irish Government supervise the dumping in conjunction with the Danish Government, and do the Irish Government intend to send a representative to ensure the proper supervision of the dumping off our coast?

The Minister in his reply to the Private Notice Questions said that full details concerning the waste to be dumped and the dumping site were received from the Danish authorities on 21st July. This information—I stress the word "information"— the Minister said has been studied by experts in the Departments of Agriculture and Fisheries, Health, Local Government and Transport and Power.

This is information obviously provided by the Danish firm to their own Government and passed on to our diplomatic representative in Denmark and subsequently passed on by the Danish authorities to the Irish authorities here. This is information only — it is not a sample of the actual deleterious matter to be dumped. I believe this dumping may take place either tomorrow or the next day. I also wish to know from the Minister why did the Irish Government not receive chemical samples, rather than the information to which the Minister referred, from this commercial firm.

Many other questions arise. Why, for instance, if the substance is so harmless, did the firm not receive permission from their own Government to dump this matter in waters not too distant from the Danish coastline? Did they receive permission from us or did they have any approach from us in connection with the dumping of the substances mentioned? Later in reply to supplementaries the Minister stated quite categorically that in regard to the chemical substances:

I understand there are 20 different chemicals in relation to this particular substance, most of which are not in any way potentially dangerous.

This, to me, presumes that some of the chemicals making up the matter are in fact dangerous. The Minister said "most of which are not in any way potentially dangerous". This is not a good enough reply, with the greatest respect. The Minister also said that the experts who examined the information — the information, mind, not the chemicals — had concluded that the cargo in question and the conditions applying to its dumping are satisfactory and that the dumping will not adversely affect Irish fisheries. I am indebted to a report by a Mr. Dick Grogan in The Irish Times today of the Killybegs Fisheries Association meeting. The members of that body catch £1 million worth of fish each year. They passed a resolution during the weekend condemning the dumping and calling on the Government to do all in their power to prevent it.

My information is, arising out of this article in The Irish Times, that the dumping site is near a major spawning ground for mackerel which swim up the West and the East coasts of Ireland. So much for the Minister's rather uninformed assurance in connection with potential damage to Irish fisheries. I do not think it is good enough for the Minister to come into this House and give this sketchy information in relation to a matter of such great importance.

Will the Minister clarify in his reply now the suggestion that the Danes are beginning a six-month programme of dumping and that this is the first shot in that programme? These are some of the questions the Minister must answer. Another question which should cause concern to the House in relation to this whole operation is that although the officials in the various Departments are doing their duty — I am in no way being critical of them — in relation to the information received was there any outside agency, any outside independent Irish scientist approached in relation to the chemicals to be dumped? I do not wish to underrate the experts in the various Departments mentioned by the Minister in his reply but I think the opinion of outside experts should have been consulted. I would feel far more at ease, and so would the nation, if this had been done.

According to the report, the chemicals involved include cyanide, formic acid, aniline, sulphonomide and alcohol. Some of these are clearly benign and represent no threat but there is a very important crunch point: it is said that Danish scientists themselves believe that far too little information is available about the long-term effects of other constituents in these chemicals on fish and marine organisms. In this connection, The Irish Times article concludes:

It is the accumulative effect of the multiple dumping rather than any single one that alarms marine scientists and environmentalists most.

This is the beginning of a six month programme of dumping and I submit the Irish Government have an obligation to protest at every given opportunity in the international arena at these dumpings. I ask the Minister and the Government to have a re-think, as it were, about our adherence to the Oslo Convention which the Minister quoted in the course of his reply to the Private Notice Questions.

This is far too serious and it is a matter in relation to which the Minister's reply was unsatisfactory. He was dilatory to say the least of it. Even at this late stage I would appeal to him to get the Government to request the Danish Government to postpone the dumping until we have ascertained without equivocation the effects of these chemicals on marine life.

In the recent past, during Question Time, I have raised many questions relating to the possibility of setting up a Department of the Environment, a Department specifically in charge of problems relating to pollution of the air and water and all other areas of pollution. Pollution is becoming a source of grave concern to the nation. I call on the Government to set up a Department of the Environment to control pollution at home and to ensure proper pollution control of the international environment.

The Minister for Finance is acting here on behalf of the Minister for Foreign Affairs who seems to spend quite a lot of his time — in fairness to him, on behalf of the country — outside the country. Perhaps at this late stage the Minister for Finance could ask the Minister for Foreign Affairs, Deputy FitzGerald, to contact the Danish Government and ask them to review the whole situation in relation to the dumping of these chemicals at the place proposed. If it is too late, I would ask him to pursue the matter further so as to ensure that this six-month programme is reviewed.

The article I have referred to is very comprehensive. The information contained in it is the only information this Dáil has or that we as public representatives have in relation to this problem. I have quoted extensively from it. I am grateful for the information contained in it. If it is too late to stop the proposed dumping tomorrow, the next day or Friday, at least we should have a conference as a matter of urgency with the Danish Government and ask them to review the proposed six month dumping programme. If the chemicals are not as dangerous, as it is suggested they are not, it seems extraordinary that the Danish Government do not dump their own chemicals on their own front doorstep.

I have been requested to let another Deputy of this party in to make his contribution arising out of a question that he raised with the Minister for Finance but I do want to say one final word. The Minister said that I was irresponsible in suggesting that there was collusion between our Government and the Danish Government. Certainly, if there was not collusion, there was co-operation by silence.

There is one point that I should like to take up. I have only five minutes in which to do it. In his reply today the Minister said:

... the dumping will not — I repeat "not"— adversely affect Irish fisheries.

That is something which has me worried. The use of the word "adversely" means to me that in some way it will affect Irish fisheries but not very extensively. I should like to ask the Minister to state when he is replying if we will have an observer there who will be entitled to take a sample, as suggested by Deputy Andrews?

The Minister also said:

The dumping is to take place in accordance with the provisions of the Oslo Convention for the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping from Ships and Aircraft.

Deputy Andrews asked why was it not being dumped in the North Sea. That is because of a report which I hope the Minister for Local Government is familiar with. He has just come back from Brussels. I refer to the Community Environmental Programme. This is a copy of the draft regulations concerning the programme of action by the European Communities. I quote paragraph 1.2, page 11, 30:

Marine pollution resulting from deliberate dumping of waste.

Two agreements relating to this problem have been adopted: the Oslo Convention (February, 1972) concerning the control of deliberate discharge of particularly dangerous waste in the areas of the North-East Atlantic and the North Sea and their secondary seas and part of the Baltic, and the London Convention (November, 1972) concerning all the seas of the world.

The point is that it would appear to me that the Oslo Convention prevents them from dumping in the sea. There are further meetings taking place this year to outlaw dumping altogether. We are a party to those negotiations. We should call a halt immediately to dumping of noxious materials.

I quote again from the Community document:

Marine pollution resulting from the transport by sea of noxious substances will be the subject of an agreement to be proposed in 1973 at the international conference on marine pollution organised by the IMCO. The aim of this conference will be to prepare international agreements aimed at the complete elimination, between 1975 and at the latest by 1980, of all deliberate and intentional pollution of sea water by hydrocarbons and other noxious substances and the reduction to a minimum of accidental discharges.

I am not satisfied that we have been sufficiently urgent in our representations. I do not think we understand the seriousness of this matter.

Another paragraph in this draft is as follows:

In addition, due cognisance is taken of the French Government's intention to hold in Paris in 1973 an international conference on marine pollution of terrestrial origin, and to prepare for this conference through consultation to take place in the institutions of the Community.

We are in the Community. The statements made by the Minister today are not at all reassuring. We have a great responsibility to the fishermen off our coasts. I should like to know what definite assurance they are being given that marine life will not be affected. I should also like to know how many tons of this material is being dumped. Deputy Andrews asked today for details of the chemicals involved and no answer was forthcoming on that. It is not good enough for a Minister to reply without the detailed knowledge that the Minister for Foreign Affairs must have in this regard. I do not believe that the Minister for Finance is au fait with the situation. I should like that we would have an observer there to see what is happening. I would ask the Minister to assure the House that this proposed dumping is not one of a series of six, as suggested by Deputy Andrews.

A six month programme.

A six month programme of dumping, which would indicate that there could be unlimited dumping in that period. The draft plan on pollution is an excellent document. I am sure it has been studied. I cannot understand why we have not given even the appearance of being forceful in our representations. The Minister for Local Government in a statement to the Press stated that he had met with the Danish Minister and was assured that there were no poisonous materials — this appeared in an evening paper — that it was quite safe. Whether that was an accurate report or not I do not know. This is what we would like the Minister to tell us. We would ask him to assure the people along our coasts that their livelihood is in no way threatened.

I would like to know if we have been in touch with the appropriate EEC committee and have consulted with them. It is very important that we should. I would ask the Minister to state whether or not the Committee on Community Environmental Studies has been approached.

This question relates to pollution.

I must now call on the Minister to reply. This is a limited debate.

I have a few words to say on it.

The 20 minutes allotted to the Deputies concerned are now exhausted and the Chair is obliged to call on the Minister. The Minister, without interruption.

I am ready to give Deputy Ahern the assurance which I am sure he and the fishermen of Cork very properly want.

The gentleman on the left knows damn all about it.

The Deputy must desist from interrupting in this fashion. The Deputy must resume his seat.

I thought this time I would get at least one minute.

The Deputy is taking up the time allotted to the Minister.

And this is democracy.

I am afraid if Deputy Ahern has any complaint he should make it against his own colleagues who have taken 20 minutes. The Minister has ten. Deputies were right to raise this matter. Many was the time when from the Opposition benches I raised questions about the pollution of the seas by other states. It is very proper that we should keep constant surveillance on the sea and in discharge of that approach to matters I am happy to say that my colleagues in the Government, both the Minister for Local Government and the Minister for Foreign Affairs, have already been active once this matter came to their notice and it was at a meeting of the EEC Council of Ministers dealing with the environment which, fortunately, by coincidence, occured last week, that the Minister for Local Government, Deputy Tully, was able to raise this matter with the Danish authorities.

Having raised it with the Danish authorities we have now got detailed and reliable particulars as to what the cargo contains. This information is not merely given by the chemical company concerned but is vouched for by three independent scientific institutes, including the institute concerned with the environment in Denmark. The information which they have given has been most carefully examined by experts here and I would like to put the factual position now on record.

The total cargo will be 2,400 tons in all, of which the only possible dangerous component is .6 of 1 ton of cyanide. Assuming the worst, that this cyanide was to be dumped all at once, the concentration resulting over an area of one square mile would be 0.01 or one-hundredth of one part of cyanide per one million parts of water. That would be a calculation applicable to coastal waters and the dilution in the area where the dumping is about to take place is such that the concentration will never be anywhere near that level because it is to be dumped in an area where the depth is 12,000 to 15,000 feet.

The area is as near and in some respects nearer Britain and Spain and the fishermen who operate in this area are mainly French and Spanish. We are aware that the British and French Governments have investigated the matter and they see no occasion to protest to the Danish authorities. We are not aware that the Spanish Government have found any cause to complain either. Of course we ought to be concerned about humanity and if we are to ensure that marine life is not damaged or destroyed we must continue to be vigilant about dumping at sea. I can assure Deputies and everybody in the country that the Government will maintain that vigilance and will leave nobody in any doubt about our anxiety to ensure that there is no dumping which could be in any way injurious.

The Minister says it is a question of dumping in an area 15,000 feet in depth. How will it be dumped? Will it be dumped in containers and released from the bottom or will it be dumped as a raw chemical?

It will be dumped as raw rubbish containing a very minute element of a chemical——

Which will disperse on top of the water.

No, because of its weight it will sink. The material is of such a nature that it will sink to the bottom and will not be carried by currents. In any case the currents operating in the area are not such as to bring the material — even if it were capable of being carried by them— to the Irish coast. Deputy Lemass today asked about the winds in the area and whether they would have any effect. As it will be dumped directly into the water, even if the winds were blowing towards us, which they would not, it would not be capable of being carried by the winds because it will be at the bottom of the sea.

While it is proper to raise these matters it is equally important that we should not set off or support any sense of alarm which would not be justified by the facts. I am sure Deputies opposite will concede the point that I am as anxious as they are to ensure that the sea and our environment is not polluted in any way. We are perfectly satisfied that this is an appropriate operation.

The Killybegs fishermen have no grounds whatever for worry or concern any more than any other fishermen in Ireland. As regards what Deputy Andrews says about the spawning grounds of mackerel, I do not think there is any scientific evidence or even any notional theory to suggest that mackerel spawn in this particular location at a depth of 12,000 to 15,000 feet.

This information was given to me in a very well informed article——

Yes, but I am giving the scientific facts. I am not doubting the competence of the author; I have not seen the article to which the Deputy refers, but suffice it to say that there is no scientific evidence available to suggest that there is any cause for fear. If we had any reason to believe there was such cause you can be certain the Government would take whatever action was open to them.

Will we have an observer there?

No, it is not proposed to send an observer because the facts which we are satisfied have been well established, would not justify having an observer. Incidentally, the situation is to be monitored and the results will be made available on an international basis. I think this is the best assurance we can have and it would be wrong to doubt the bona fides of the Danish Government in this matter. They have acted very properly and all the Danish authorities, those concerned with the protection of the environment and the scientific institutes, have been very keen from the beginning to study the question of the disposal of this waste and the steps which are being taken are those which they are confident —I do not think anybody has disputed this confidence — will not result in any injury whatever to marine life at any level which is of interest to mankind and certainly to us within the territorial waters of the State.

It has been said that this is the beginning of a six-months dumping programme. We do not want to be alarmist about this.

Yes. I do not know what the basis is for that report. We are glad to hear of this because we have no indication that this is so but of course any possible peril, remote though it might be, would tend to be increased if dumping were to continue. It is not just this dumping but dumping by many countries across the world that is a cause of serious concern and it is on that account that we already have the Oslo Convention to control this matter. We are assured this dumping will be in accordance with the Oslo Convention and I am happy to say, unlike some previous conferences under the previous administration where the matter of the use of the sea was under discussion, at all future conferences, particularly those this year dealing with the matter to which Deputy Briscoe referred, this country will be represented by most active and well-informed contributors to ensure that all necessary steps are taken to protect the lives of Irish fishermen and of everybody on this island.

The Dáil adjourned at 11 p.m. until 10.30 a.m. on Wednesday, 25th July, 1973.

Top
Share