Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 4 Jul 1974

Vol. 274 No. 3

Committee on Finance. - Industrial Credit (Amendment) Bill, 1974: Second Stage.

I move: "That the Bill be now read a Second Time."

This Bill is designed to increase the statutory limit on the borrowing powers of the Industrial Credit Company and also to increase the limit on the extent to which the Minister for Finance can guarantee the company's borrowing.

The existing statutory limit on borrowing by the Industrial Credit Company is £30 million. Actual borrowing is now £22 million and is rising rapidly as the company's business continues to expand. On the basis of firm commitments already entered into by the company it is probable that the statutory limit will be exceeded in the second half of 1974. It is essential, therefore, that the limit on borrowing be raised to enable the company to procure additional resources. The new limit proposed in section 2 of the Bill is £75 million. Deputies may consider that an increase of £45 million is very large. Industrial Credit Company business is, however, growing at an unprecedented rate and it is likely that the upward trend will continue.

In the period April to December, 1974, the company have budgeted to provide financial facilities totalling £14.6 million for industry. In the previous 12 months the company disbursed £13 million which was in itself a record figure. Of the £14.6 million which the company will advance up to December next, £5.5 million relates to their subsidiary company, Shipping Finance Corporation, which provides loans for new shipbuilding. The balance will be disbursed by the Industrial Credit Company for the benefit of industry in general. Most of the capital used by the Industrial Credit Company for their own purposes is secured from non-Exchequer sources and it is hoped that this position will continue. The capital required for the operations of the Shipping Finance Corporation is provided from the Exchequer.

The Minister for Finance has power under the existing legislation to guarantee borrowing by the ICC and it is proposed in section 3 of the Bill to raise the limit on his power of guarantee from £30 million to £75 million to correspond with the new limit on borrowing. At present the total amount borrowed under guarantee is £6 million and it is unlikely that the Minister will be called on to guarantee all borrowing by the company. It is the usual practice, however, to fix the same limits for borrowing and guarantee powers.

Over the last decade the ICC have considerably expanded their activities. The company's main activity is the provision of longer-term loans but they also offer a wide and sophisticated range of other investment facilities to meet the complex demands of industry. These include share investment in industry, capital underwriting and issuing house services, hire purchase facilities for plant and machinery, equipment leasing and finance for distribution. In addition to the provision of capital they have also a subsidiary company, Mergers Limited, which specialises in the field of mergers and takeovers by undertaking share evaluations and by advising in negotiations for mergers between firms. As I have already mentioned, they are also concerned with shipbuilding finance through its other subsidiary company, Shipping Finance Corporation.

Since our entry into membership of the European Economic Community the demand for ICC facilities has expanded rapidly. Given the trading opportunities now open to us and the need for increased industrial investment to sustain economic growth, there will be a continuing demand for the facilities provided by the company. I am most anxious, therefore, that the company should be in a position to contribute to industry the financial and organisational expertise which they have built up over the years in addition to financial assistance. The present legislation, when enacted, will enable the company to maintain a reasonable flow of funds to industry.

Because of the high demand for industrial finance and the capital intensive nature of modern industry it will not be easy for the company to provide all the funds which industry is likely to require. In seeking funds from the Exchequer the company's requirements will have to be balanced against demands on behalf of other important services. It is hoped, therefore, that the commendable initiative shown by the company in the past in raising capital from non-Exchequer sources can be maintained. In the past few years the company have made significant advances in tapping sources of capital abroad. They have established a very valuable association with the World Bank with which they have negotiated a loan. It is also confidently expected that our membership of the EEC will redound to the company's advantage by enabling them to draw on the resources of Community institutions such as the European Bank and to make contact with the national development banks and other financial institutions in the other member states. In this regard I am pleased to be able to inform the House that the company have completed negotiations with the European Investment Bank for a loan of £2½ million the full details of which will be announced in the near future.

For over 40 years the ICC have been to the fore in the financing of Irish industry. At present the company have over £30 million invested in industry. Many of the successful industries established over the past 40 years started from modest beginnings with the assistance of finance provided or arranged by the company. Facilities are provided for the establishment of new industries as well as the expansion of existing firms and the company have a tradition of giving special attention to proposals in regard to small projects. The continuing increase in the demand for the company's facilities is proof that their importance has in no way diminished with the enlargement of the industrial and financial sectors of our economy. The present legislation will enable the company to continue their important role in the development of the economy and I confidently recommend the Bill for the approval of the House.

As far as we are concerned on this side of the House we readily accept the necessity for this Bill and we will not impede its progress in the House. There are, however, a few matters on which I should like to comment. First, since this is the first opportunity I have had of saying this in public I would like to pay a very sincere and public tribute to the work of Dr. J. P. Beddy who was chairman of the Industrial Credit Company for quite a number of years and was associated with various activities of the Industrial Credit Company since their foundation. It is appropriate that a tribute should be paid to the work of Dr. Beddy for the Industrial Credit Company and the country in general. This work, while, perhaps not as widely recognised as that of other people, was no less appreciated by those who were aware of it.

The Industrial Credit Company were set up in 1933 by the first Fianna Fáil Government and their activities have been of very great importance in the industrialisation of this country. While I have not got up-to-date figures I have one percentage figure which illustrates the important part this company have played. Between 1933 and 1968 the Industrial Credit Company accounted for 54 per cent of all the capital raised by industrial companies in the State. In my view that is a fair indication of the important role the company have played in the industrialisation of this country.

It is true, of course, that since then there has been a very substantial increase in industrialisation accompanied by a very substantial increase in the involvement both by way of the amount of money and sophisticated know-how input by banks and other financial institutions. Despite that I believe that the Industrial Credit Company will continue to have an important role to play and that they did to a great extent pioneer the provision of capital for Irish industry at a time when the ordinary financial institutions were not all that keen to get involved. In recent years the Industrial Credit Company have increased the sophistication of their service to the community so that they are now fulfilling many of the functions of an investment bank and a merchant bank. This is as it should be.

The Industrial Credit Company have some subsidiary companies one of which is Mergers Limited. I note that on page 8 of the company's report and accounts for the year ending 31st October, 1973, the following statement occurs:

Mergers Limited had a busy year and its income went up by 50 per cent. In conjunction with some other financial institutions representations were made to the Department of Industry and Commerce concerning the legislation to be introduced by the Minister for the control of mergers.

It is only right that that should have been done because clearly Mergers Limited will be affected by any legislation introduced in that regard.

The whole area of that legislation is somewhat of a mystery. It will be recalled that the former Minister for Industry and Commerce, Deputy Lalor, had prepared legislation dealing with mergers and takeovers. It will also be recalled that the present Minister for Industry and Commerce, after he assumed office, said he was scrapping that Bill because it was not strong enough and that he was going to introduce stronger measures. It may also be recalled that the present Minister for Foreign Affairs, shortly before the last election, apparently gave semi-secret undertakings to certain groups to the effect that nothing untoward would be done in regard to legislation of this kind.

Whatever may have happened at that time, the fact is that we are now into July 1974 and we have not seen that legislation and only within the last week or so, in response to a supplementary question of mine, the Minister for Industry and Commerce became very upset apparently and sought the protection of the Chair when all I was asking was when he was going to produce the legislation. We do not seem to be able to get any information from the Minister for Industry and Commerce and since the legislation in question is not only of very great importance to the whole community but is of direct importance to Mergers Limited, a whollyowned subsidiary of the company for which we are being asked to agree to substantial increases, would the Minister for Finance, when he is replying, throw any light on this increasingly mysterious situation in regard to the legislation on takeovers and mergers which is badly needed, the previous Bill having been scrapped by the present Government as not being strong enough. We are now left with no legislation. Perhaps the Minister could enlighten us as to what is happening about that.

The Minister referred to the fact that it might be thought that the proposed addition of £45 million to the statutory limit on borrowing, with the corresponding increase in the statutory limit on guarantee power of the Minister, was excessive. I would agree with him that perhaps a few years ago such a figure might well have been thought excessive in a case like this. As the Minister is well aware, an effort is made in legislation of this kind which has to be brought in periodically in regard to the Industrial Credit Company and many other State companies to try to measure the amount of additional money to be provided in such a way as to reach a figure which will enable the body concerned to operate effectively but nevertheless will ensure that at reasonable intervals new legislation will be needed so that the operation of that body can come under periodic review in this House. On the basis of what the situation would have been a couple of years ago, say when I was Minister for Finance, this figure would certainly have been considered excessive and as stretching the interval for review by this House too far. However, I agree with the Minister in this case that it is not in fact stretching it too far. I say this for two reasons. One is that the activities of the Industrial Credit Company are expanded and, secondly, and it is tied in with the first, at the rate inflation is going now and with the prospects for the fairly immediate future, this figure of £45 million is not nearly as much as it may seem. Indeed the Minister may have to come back with further legislation on those lines at least as soon as would be equivalent to the last interval and maybe even in a shorter term. For that reason I have no objection to the amount proposed in this Bill.

In regard to the activities of the Industrial Credit Company, admirable as they are, I believe that there is built into these activities a form of subsidy to Irish industry. I say this not in any carping spirit because I believe that what is being done is correct and that it should be done. Nevertheless it should be recognised that there is involved in it a significant form of subsidy for Irish industry and this because the rate of dividend paid by the company on its share capital is 2½ per cent which, in ordinary commercial terms, would not normally enable it to retain that capital. Secondly, to the extent that the Government guarantee loans to the company—though the Minister has said this is relatively small I think the figure will increase—there is a form of subsidy which is not easy to measure but it is there. I say this because there are occasions when certain people with an interest, not by any means all of them but some of them who have an interest in industry, tend to think that they are operating wholly in a competitive field without any assistance from the Government of the day and rather tend to think only of interference by the Government of the day. There are many other areas where the same thing could be said but in this particular area there is a form of subsidy available in the activities of the Industrial Credit Company in so far as it assists Irish industry. I repeat that I would not change this, I am merely recording the fact that subsidy exists.

The Minister has adverted to the fact that the Industrial Credit Company has raised most of the capital it requires from non-Exchequer sources and has expressed the hope that that will continue. I would certainly concur in that hope. I know, from the activities of the Industrial Credit Company, that the concerns from which it raises money tend to be bodies like the World Bank and the loans tend to be of that kind. Nevertheless, I am posing the question, and perhaps the Minister will be able to tell me whether it is practical but one cannot help wondering when one sees the activities of the Agricultural Credit Corporation and the very effective advertising campaign which it embarked on some years ago to attract deposits, whether a similar kind of campaign is possible or would be worthwhile in regard to the Industrial Credit Company. I can see certain difficulties in this but perhaps the Minister could tell us whether he thinks they are insuperable or whether this ought to be initiated.

I was under the impression, which is somewhat shaken by the wording of what the Minister said in his speech, that the Industrial Credit Company had joined an association of development banks in the EEC. The Minister's wording leaves me in some doubt so perhaps he would tell us, when he is replying, whether, in fact, they have joined an association of development banks. I would believe that if this is so it would be a necessary preliminary step to an adequate implementation of a regional policy of the EEC, something that we have not yet seen, to our regret, but I am confident that we will see it. In so far as the Industrial Credit Company have taken or are taking a step of this kind it is, I believe, a step in the right direction. It should be borne in mind that the Industrial Credit Company by the statutory provisions under which they exist have no obligation whatsoever to have regard to regional policies in this country. They have no specific obligation to help the west more than the east under any statutory obligation but if they are about to join in such an association, as I have mentioned, I would regard this as a step on the road towards implementing regional policy for the European Economic Community in this country. Therefore, while they would not have the statutory obligation to engage in that it would indicate they were about to engage in such activities which, of course, they are not prohibited from doing by their statutory set-up.

The Minister in what he said answered a question I was about to ask. I intended to ask if any money had been received or any negotiations were in progress with the European Investment Bank. He said that the company had completed negotiations with the European Investment Bank for a loan of £2 million, the full details of which, he said will be announced in the near future. This is satisfactory but on the face of it it seems to me to be a very paltry figure to be the subject of a loan by the European Investment Bank with the EEC. I hope that it is merely a preliminary arrangement and that we can expect considerably more substantial loans from the European Investment Bank to the Industrial Credit Company in the future.

The European Investment Bank is, and should be, one of the very important sources of finance for us in the European Economic Community for the purpose of the development of our economy and, in particular, for the purpose of industrial development. I do not think there is any better instrument available to the State for industrial development, particularly development of native Irish industry, than the Industrial Credit Company. For that reason I am anxious to ensure that the maximum benefit is got from our membership of the European Investment Bank to further the activity of the Industrial Credit Company.

One other matter, to which I wish to refer, may not appear to be relevant but I believe it is. The Minister may recall on a previous occasion I asked some questions about the position concerning Fóir Teoranta. He will recall, when that company was set up originally, arrangements were made whereby the Industrial Credit Company supplied the staff and management for Fóir Teoranta but it was open to Fóir Teoranta to decide at a later date whether they wished to continue this arrangement or set up their own staff and management structure. When I enquired about this last the Minister told me that the Industrial Credit Company were continuing to supply this. I would like to know if that is still the position and if it is intended to continue it. If it is the position I would like to know if any progress has been made on a matter which I, as Minister for Finance, discussed with the board of Fóir Teoranta and in which I was considerably interested, that is the development of a nucleus of management expertise in Fóir Teoranta, provided as of now by the Industrial Credit Company.

I am particularly interested in this because experience shows in many cases where industries get into difficulty while, of course, the immediate problem is financial—there may be others—in many cases the root cause is lack of management expertise. Very often where the money is available to remedy some problems other problems cannot be remedied. Unless management expertise can be supplied it is throwing good money after bad for Fóir Teoranta to invest money in the proposition. I spoke on this before and I am aware of the various difficulties which I outlined then but will not outline now. I am very interested to know if the Industrial Credit Company are still providing the management structure for Fóir Teoranta and if any progress has been made in this regard.

There are various other aspects of the activities of the Industrial Credit Company which I believe are admirable and are well worthy of accommodation and perhaps of more detailed comment. However, I do not intend at this stage to go into any great detail on this. I want simply to say that, subject to the information I hope the Minister will be able to give me on the various points I raised, I unhesitatingly support the Second Reading of this Bill.

I would like to associate myself with the remarks made by Deputy Colley concerning Dr. Beddy, who was a very good man in the setting up of the Industrial Credit Company. He was originally the secretary and then became chairman but is no longer chairman. I am speaking as an ex-pupil of his. He gave me my first lectures in education on industry, like a lot of us, in UCD. The Industrial Credit Company carry the hallmark of his good, careful and proper planning and thinking in the growth and development of that company.

There are many industrialists today who can be deeply grateful for the help they received from Dr. Beddy and his colleagues. It was not just a question of going in and getting financial assistance. Expertise and know-how were freely given, no matter what the trouble was, no matter how small or difficult the problem was. Many of the men on the staff of the Industrial Credit Company on their own account did a lot of travelling and foraging to find information to help early industry in this country. Our present industrial structure can be very grateful for the work those men did in the past. We are talking about an ongoing operation.

The Minister stated that Deputies may consider that an increase of £45 million is very large. There is no fear of it being regarded as very large. From a professional point of view and knowing the amount of money that is now involved in any industrial project I can say that figure of £45 million is by no means very large. It is just keeping pace with requirements. I would regard it as a short-term review of requirements because since our entry into the EEC one can see one is now dealing in today's terms with much larger figures than one dealt with two years ago. There is an increasing demand for considerable and heavy capital requirements in industry.

I note that the real object and prime purpose of the Industrial Credit Company is to deal with possibly longer-term loans than one would obtain from the normal industrial sector. The Industrial Credit Company can be described as the banking arm of modern industrial policy. It is a State body. It is very necessary. We all know that there are ups and downs in the money market. Private banking concerns possibly view things with the prime motive of profit and a certain amount of selfishness when it comes to lending money. That is their nature and their shareholders require that sort of approach. The Industrial Credit Company can very often forget about those requirements and fill a necessary gap in industrial finance.

As I have said, the implications of the EEC will bring great changes in our industrial fabric. One must remember that the Industrial Credit Company was formed in an age which shortly became one of very severe and closely protected home industrial enterprise, protected by tariff barriers and by quotas. It grew out of a rather unreal situation. We are now living in an age when these barriers are being torn down rapidly and an industrialist has to stand on his own feet in the market place. This is not easy for an industrialist in a small country like ours when we are dealing with large European and international commercial concerns who can, at the stroke of a pen, set up in or withdraw from a country.

When native people in this country want to start a project they must be assured that they will not be made the victims of financial withdrawal, the withdrawal of financial support. I regret to say—and we can all instance this—that certain American banks withdrew money in the past and caused considerable industrial embarrassment to people in this country. We are all aware of that. It is only right that one should say it in this House, so that we can now look at the necessity for having our own State industrial bank which will first of all look at things from a national viewpoint, a properly measured and properly tuned viewpoint, but one with a national outlook.

The scope for the Industrial Credit Company is large and progressive. I regret that when this Bill comes into the House it does not appear to attract all that much attention from Deputies. It may be a small Bill at first glance, but its implications are very large and extremely important.

Deputy Colley referred to a nucleus of management expertise. It is only right to say—possibly I can say it easier, and Deputy Colley will probably agree with me—that one of the great problems is that we have an institution like the Industrial Credit Company which trains able young men but, right outside the door are other financial institutions offering a bigger carrot to these men when they are qualified and when they have this expertise. I have a feeling that, although it has not damaged the company, this has caused considerable difficulties for the higher echelons of management and personnel. They have lost many good men who have gone into private banking and merchant banking. This is one of the symptoms and one of the results which must follow in a very well-run institution. It is of running concern to an institution like the Industrial Credit Company. It has to deal with it as a continuing problem.

I hope that those people who go into the Industrial Credit Company will stay there and see that there is a good future for them. I know that many of my contemporaries went into that institution and did well and worked well there. Many others were enticed away into private business. I hope that the emoluments and the attractions of service in a State institution like this, will induce people to stay there. They have obtained valuable practical experience and, in the years they have been there, they have done very good work.

I am also aware of the fact that the legal department of the Industrial Credit Company has done very good work and has educated many members of the legal profession in how to go about dealing with industrial finance. I know also that there are very good relations between the Industrial Credit Company and the deposit banks, the larger banks, and that they work very well in tandem in many businesses. It is good to see that. It means that the Industrial Credit Company has integrated itself fully into the financial structure of our nation. Overall the most important aspect of the company is that it is there when others funk going into the market to give assistance.

Well deserved tribute has been paid from both sides of the House to Dr. Beddy and those who participate with him in the functions of the Industrial Credit Company. It comes as a bit of a shock to learn from Deputy Colley that 54 per cent of all the capital raised for industrial purposes from 1933 to 1968 came through the efforts of the company. That indicates how terribly important this organisation is and what we, as a community, owe to the efforts of those people. One would not like to think of what our stage of industrial development would be today if this body had not been founded in 1933.

The Minister mentioned Mergers Limited. As a Deputy I would be very curious to hear one or two examples of what it has done, if that would be proper. Deputy Colley rightly raised the question, which is not in the Minister's province, of what is to happen about the Monopolies Bill. We have not seen any sign of it. The Minister mentioned that £30 million is invested by the company in industry. I should like to ask where this is invested, and whether it is in shareholdings. Can the Minister enlighten me as to whether there has been much recoupment over the years of finance provided to enable industries to continue in existence?

I am also curious to know in relation to the non-Exchequer sources of capital, excluding the forthcoming money from the European Investment Bank, as to where the Corporation has got these non-exchequer capital amounts. I would refer to the matter mentioned by Deputy Colley which I think is important, that the Industrial Credit Company does not have in its terms of reference a social policy direction in relation to the eastern or the western part of the country. It seems to be desirable that consideration should be given to this in the future.

I am grateful to the House for the manner in which they have received this proposal that the Bill should receive the support of the House. I am glad that Dr. Beddy has been mentioned by Deputy Colley and Deputy Esmonde as a person deserving of the thanks and congratulations of the Irish people for his immense contribution in this vital sector of our economy. He is a giant amongst many great men who have served Irish industry very well in its earlier struggling years and he has done so successfully against the forebodings of Doubting Thomases. It is obviously very much to his credit and the credit of his colleagues who had such great confidence and who look so optimistically on the future of Irish industry.

The fact that we are today seeking to increase the borrowing powers of the Industrial Credit Company from £30 million to £75 million in one stroke is a further monument to the foresight and the good management of Dr. Beddy and his colleagues. It may seem extraordinary to Members that we are jumping by £45 million in one Bill, a Bill which is tailored as all previous Bills have been which sought to increase the borrowing powers of the Industrial Credit Company for a period of four years, but an indication of the need for this very rapid and significant growth can be obtained from the performance of the Industrial Credit Company over the past couple of years. For instance, in the 12 months ending March, 1973, the capital offered by the Industrial Credit Company to industry was £4.61 million, but for the 12 months ending March, 1974, that figure had virtually trebled, to £13.02 million and in the 12 months to March, 1975, the figure will be between £18 million and £19 million, a growth from £4.61 million to nearly £20 million in a matter of two years and that is far more than a reflection of inflation, thanks be to God. Bad and all as world inflation is at the moment—and there are places worse than Ireland—we have not reached the situation and please God we never will reach that multiple but it is a fair indication of the massive demand which industry now makes upon our total resources, a demand which we should welcome because it is an indication of the great growth potential of industry, without which we would be in very serious economic straits.

The Confederation of Irish Industry estimates that in comparison with the total requirement of £125 million for industrial development last year, the current year's requirements will be about £300 million and it will be required in each year for a number of years to come, in order that Irish industry may be able to avail itself of the opportunities open to it. It is interesting enough that the multiple which the Confederation of Irish Industry and ourselves have in mind here more or less coincides but it is not an easy thing to service such a colossal demand. The Government, however, consider the provision of capital for industry as a top priority because it will generate wealth, will generate the moneys required to improve our standard of living and in so doing, will also be generating employment which is so vital for happiness and contentment, the maintenance of our standards and the attainment of even better standards in the future.

The sources of capital to the Industrial Credit Company are several, and the position as of 31st October, 1973, indicates the sources. The issued share capital of the company is £8.8 million, Exchequer advances are £12.4 million, bank loans as of last year were £1.3 million, deposits and shortterm loans, £2 million, which incidentally at the moment is almost £2.5 million, showing a very commendable increase in a comparatively short time, bank overdraft £100,000, reserves and surplus £2 million and other accounts, £1.2 million. As I mentioned in my opening speech, we will shortly be receiving a further loan of £2.5 million from the European Investment Bank. Deputy Colley thought that was a very small sum. It, of course, is not the end of what we shall be borrowing from that source, one has to be in the position to offer to the lenders a suitable scheme or plan to absorb the money offered.

The European Investment Bank usually invests no more than 40 per cent of the total required for any particular project. The money being offered on this occasion which we are taking up is to be made available for small projects rather than large ones, and, of course, the Industrial Credit Company by its behaviour in the past, shows that it is particularly concerned in giving support to small enterprises, so that that £2.5 million represents 40 per cent of what will go into the small industries in the very near future and we would be hopeful that this would be a recurring advance from that particular source.

Reference was made to the question of increasing the deposits which the Industrial Credit Company could attract from Irish sources or, indeed, from anywhere else. Like all other deposits, they are in very keen competition at present and the Industrial Credit Company have certainly no reason to be ashamed of their success in this particular field, when one has regard to the fact that the number of offices they have is only three, in Dublin, Cork and Limerick, but they have shown a very commendable growth against other agencies which have multiplied the number of their offices to attract deposits and in some cases are running offices far beyond the capacity of the deposits they attract to pay for them.

One of the great merits of the Industrial Credit Company is that they have never overstressed themselves, have never been interested in prestige for its own sake. They have never taken improper risks but have had the courage to take risks where other people were not prepared to step in. As Deputy Esmonde said, they have invested money and taken risks where other people funked them but the Industrial Credit Company have always very sensibly measured the potential of projects put before them and as I emphasised at the beginning and, indeed, as Deputy Colley, Deputy Esmonde, and Deputy Brugha said, one of the great virtues of the Industrial Credit Company is that it has provided not merely money, which of course is very useful at any time, but it has also made available management and advice without parallel. As Deputy Esmonde said, a great deal of it is rewarded at a rate much less than would be offered in the private sector.

That is a very difficult problem to solve. Our predecessors set up the Review Body to examine the top salaries in the public sector. The Devlin recommendations were made several years ago, and these were referred by our predecessors to the Employer-Labour conference and have subsequently been processed through the Labour Court. Recently the Government have indicated to boards of semi-State bodies that, as the boards of semi-State bodies should observe the Devlin limits and the national wage agreements where they are applicable, they should exercise their responsibility of fixing remuneration for their top executives responsibly and should justify any increases which they give, subject at all times to the right of the Review Body to review any rate which may be fixed.

People in the public sector have not been in the past, and I suppose for a long time in the future may not be, rewarded at the same very generous rates as the private sector would sometimes offer. But there are awards for serving in the public sector which are not available in the private sector, including the reward of serving the community. I think we should be extremely grateful to all people in the Industrial Credit Company and elsewhere who have accepted the disciplines and the passing disadvantages which may seem to be there while they are serving in the public sector. We should not, however, regard as a total loss any drain from the public sector into private industry and private commerce, because the discipline, the understanding of both the public and private sectors, which people get when they are serving in the public sector is something which rubs off to the advantage of the whole economy and generates co-operation and understanding on both sides which is very much to the benefit of our community.

Deputy Colley asked whether the Industrial Credit Company was a member of the Association of Development Banks. It is, but of course membership of that does not of itself yield immediate and concrete results, although a great deal has been learned from membership of that association. Its main function is to invest in trans-national projects, and the company itself has not to date been involved in any project of that kind, but it is not unlikely that it will in the future be involved in such a project. If and when that arises it may well be necessary to give the company further legislative powers beyond those which it has at present, but until such time as the requirement would be known we would not be in a position to tailor the legislation which might be required. The rate of dividend which the State receives in respect of its shareholding with the company is only 3 per cent, which is negligible by current standards.

I thought I referred to it as 2½ per cent.

Yes, it used to be 2½ but it has now been increased to 3. As I say, by current rates it is negligible, but the State investment in share capital is about £8.8 million, and if the State is taking less on that investment than might be justified were it now to lend them money, on the other hand, the Industrial Credit Company offers a number of loans at rates less than the market rate, including a very important field in which a subsidiary of the company is involved, that is, in the provision of shipping finance, where finance is made available to the shipping industry at rates which do not exceed 7½ per cent, again a dramatically small figure compared with current rates. Some of the loans which are made available also to smaller companies are at rates less than they would be if they were receiving them from the private sector. But all in all, we should not feel that this is in any way a measure of lack of efficiency on the part of the company, that they are either paying such a small dividend on the share capital or lending at such small rates; it is simply a measure of the social content which the State and Oireachtas Éireann consider should be in both the capital holding and in the lending made by the company.

There was also a query about the management team which might be available to Fóir Teoranta and to any organisations assisted by Fóir Teoranta. The position at present is that which I previously outlined, that is, that the Industrial Credit Company provide the staff and the management advice for Fóir Teoranta. It is a very beneficial arrangement, benefiting both the Industrial Credit Company and companies that are assisted by Fóir Teoranta. Fóir itself has advertised for management specialists but to date have not been able to recruit people of sufficient calibre in this field. The search is being pursued and it may be possible to succeed in this field.

I thank the Minister for that information, but just to clarify it, are they seeking people whom they would put in temporarily to a business which they are assisting or for the running of their own business?

That would be part of their responsibilities, that they would service the industries that are being assisted by Fóir. However, I suppose it is because of the fact that Fóir has to move into a situation where confidence is lacking that there has been some difficulty in recruiting management——

I am aware of the problem.

——of the correct calibre, but I would like to emphasise that people who would offer their services here have nothing to fear, because they would have a total State guarantee behind their employment and their future prospects.

This is not the occasion to debate whether or not Fóir and the IDA should be amalgamated, but it is pertinent, as the matter has been raised here, to pose the question as to whether or not the Department of Finance is the proper Department to, as it were, supervise Fóir Teoranta. By its nature it must be a very dynamic group involved directly in the day-to-day management of industry, and Deputy Colley, I am sure, will agree with me that first-class as are the advisers to a Minister for Finance from the Department of Finance, they have not just got that day-to-day experience. This is a matter we are closely examining, because we see the need to provide first-class, dynamic management to rescue industries which are in trouble. As Deputy Colley and others have said, they are oftentimes in trouble, not merely due to the inadequate financial control or perhaps some passing difficulties in trade and commerce, but simply due to some defect of management. If we can develop the right kind of management team and recruit the correct personnel it should be possible to remove this difficulty.

Deputy Brugha was anxious to know where the finance is invested. He will appreciate that it would be invidious to name companies, but I can give a breakdown of the general sectors in which the investments have been made. In the food and food processing industry there is just £3 million or 11 per cent of the total; in textiles £3.6 million or 13.3 per cent of the total; in footwear and clothing £480,000 or 1.8 per cent of the total —perhaps that is a disappointment to Deputy Brugha—in furniture, fixtures and wood products £1.8 million or 6.7 per cent. in printing, publishing and allied industries £1.5 million or 5.5 per cent; in chemical and chemical products £1.4 million or 5.2 per cent; in non-metallic mineral products £4.3 million or 15.8 per cent; metal products £1.7 million or 6.3 per cent; machinery £875,000 or 3.2 per cent; shipping construction £4 million or 15 per cent. Then there are miscellaneous industries £1.3 million or 4.8 per cent; distribution and other services £3.1 million or 11.4 per cent.

In relation to the last figure there, one of the recent developments of the Industrial Credit Company has been to provide money for the distributive trades. This is a new departure because originally the concept was to put money into manufacturing industry. We know all too well now, though everybody does not perhaps yet appreciate it, that the distributive trade is critically important to both industry and commerce and that is why the company has very properly in latter years invested money in the distributive end of our economy. I trust that information may be of assistance to the House and I again express my gratitude to the House for the way in which it has dealt with this legislation.

I queried the source of income. Is it interest or are dividends included in the source of income of the company?

Interest on loans advanced and repayments are, of course, part of the money which comes into the pool for relending.

Question put and agreed to.
Agreed to take remaining Stages today.
Top
Share