Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 17 Jul 1974

Vol. 274 No. 8

Exchange Control (Continuance) Bill, 1974: Second Stage

I move: "That the Bill be now read a Second Time."

The only purpose of the Bill is to continue in operation the Exchange Control Act, 1954, for a further period of four years. That Act is due to expire on 31st December, 1974.

Historically exchange control originated in the emergency conditions of 1939 when it became necessary for us, in common with other sterling area countries, to help safeguard the foreign exchange reserves of the area to which we had access for our requirements of foreign currencies. Exchange control was first operated under emergency legislation. This was replaced in 1954 by the present Exchange Control Act. The Act was expressed to expire four years later. However it has not proved possible to dispense completely with exchange control and the operation of the Act has therefore been extended at four year intervals ever since.

The 1954 Act gives power to control:—

payments to and on behalf of persons resident outside the scheduled territories—at present, the State, Northern Ireland, Great Britain, the Channel Islands, the Isle of Man and Gibraltar;

dealings in gold and foreign exchange;

dealings in and the export of foreign currency securities and unregistered sterling securities;

dealings in sterling securities on behalf of persons resident outside the scheduled territories;

the export of currency notes and the manner of payment for goods exported outside the scheduled territories.

The Act empowers the Minister for Finance to specify foreign currencies which must be sold to a bank so that they may come into the common pool. It further contains power to require the deposit of foreign currency securities and unregistered sterling securities with an authorised depositary, but it has not been found necessary to bring these latter provisions into operation.

The Act provides for the grant of exemptions by regulations from compliance with requirements of the Act and for the giving of general or limited permissions to carry out transactions. These provisions are being operated so that foreign exchange is readily available to Irish residents for all bona fide current payments in accordance with our obligations to the IMF. Such supervision as is applied is designed to ensure that current transactions are not used as a cover for unauthorised capital movements.

Control of capital transfers continues to be necessary. Persons wishing to make direct or portfolio investments outside the scheduled territories are not generally permitted to transfer capital for this purpose at the official rate of exchange. Investment currency may be purchased for the purpose but this usually stands at a substantial premium over the official exchange rate or it may be financed by foreign borrowing. Sales of foreign currency securities are subject to certain conditions on the disposal of the proceeds of the sale.

The day-to-day administration of exchange control is in the hands of the Central Bank of Ireland, to which it was delegated in 1965.

The Treaty of Rome requires member states to abolish progressively restrictions on capital movements between themselves to the extent necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the Common Market.

So far two directives have been adopted by the Community requiring the liberalisation of particular categories of capital movements.

The principal transactions involved are direct investment in business undertakings and the purchase of publicly quoted securities. During the negotiations for accession to the Community, we sought and obtained arrangements under which the removal of restrictions on these transactions would be implemented gradually over a transitional period. A substantial relaxation on direct investment was however implemented on entry, under which official exchange is allowed up to a limit of £250,000 per project per year for all new approved direct investments by Irish residents in EEC countries other than the UK. Applications to transfer larger amounts at the official rate of exchange are considered on their merits. Relaxations were also made in relation to capital transfers by Irish residents taking up employment in other EEC countries.

The existing exchange control legislation is adequate to enable us to meet our EEC obligations as they now stand. This can be done by making suitable amending regulations and giving necessary permissions.

It is not easy to foresee what developments may occur in coming years in relation to foreign exchange transactions. There is no immediate prospect however that sterling will become freely convertible on capital account. It is necessary therefore to retain the 1954 Exchange Control Act in operation. I ask the House to agree to its extension for a further period of four years and I recommend the Bill for approval on this basis.

In an ideal world one would not need legislation of this type. Unfortunately, we are not living in an ideal world and, indeed, in so far as the international monetary scene is concerned, the situation appears to me to be becoming more chaotic by the year, if not by the month. Approximately two years ago the situation was unsatisfactory but there were a number of moves made to bring about a stabilisation of the international monetary scene. It seems to me now the situation is considerably worse and that prospects of bringing about stabilisation are even further in the future. That being so, it is, of course, necessary in our own national interest, to continue in operation legislation of this kind. I say in our own national interest because, while it might appear on the face of it that what we are doing is simply protecting the sterling area, we are by so doing protecting our own national interest so long as the Irish £ is related on an exact equivalent basis to the £ sterling.

As we know that is a situation which heretofore has certainly been to our advantage, weighing up the advantages and disadvantages against each other. I believe it is still to our advantage to maintain this parity, but it is quite clear that the balance of advantage is reducing and it may well be that we will in the quite foreseeable future reach a stage where the balance will lie rather on the other side and that the disadvantages will outweigh the advantages. If that time comes for us there will not be any hesitation on our part in breaking the link with sterling. As long as that link exists legislation of this kind is, of course, necessary.

The Minister has outlined the manner in which we operate it and I must say it has not come to my knowledge that any people genuinely engaged in business operations, the transfer of their homes or any non-speculative kind of transaction had any difficulty whatever in operating under these regulations. Therefore I do not think by extending this legislation we are creating any difficulties for the citizens of this country.

There is only one matter I want to ask the Minister about. He refers to the two directives adopted by the European Community requiring the liberalisation of particular categories of capital movements. Later on he says:

The existing exchange control legislation is adequate to enable us to meet our EEC obligations as they now stand. This can be done by making suitable amending regulations and giving necessary permissions.

The "necessary permissions" is clear enough but I wonder, in relation to the "amending regulations", if the Minister could indicate when it is expected such regulations will be made, when it is expected it will be necessary to make them. I do not want any great detail but I should like the Minister to outline the nature of the regulations that will be made in order to enable us to comply fully with the EEC directives.

That is the only question I wish to ask the Minister. I subscribe fully to the necessity to extend the existing exchange control regulations. I repeat they are in the national interest and therefore, as far as I am concerned and we on this side of the House are concerned we place no obstacle at all in the way of the passage of this Bill.

I am grateful to Deputy Colley for his reception of this Bill. He is correct in saying that the international money market is very unstable at the present time. That is, if anything, an understatement. It is, unfortunately, chaotic. There has been no time since the 1930s that the international monetary scene has been so unstable as it is at present. I can assure him once again, as I have already assured the House, that if the balance of advantage tips over in favour of our departing from the par link with sterling we will be ready to take a look at the possibility of severing that link; but as long as our trade is weighted so heavily in relation to the United Kingdom it is unlikely we will sever this link. At the same time people should understand that the link is maintained because it is to our advantage to maintain it. We are free to break it if we so wish, but it assists trade with our chief trading partner and it also eases investments from abroad in Ireland. These are two major factors that cannot be lightly thrown aside.

As regards the EEC, since our entry in January, 1973, exchange control measures formerly applying to EEC countries as non-scheduled territories have been relaxed in two ways. Exchange control permission is still required for direct investment in EEC countries. The use of official exchange is however allowed for all new investments, subject to the limit of £250,000 annually for new projects which I have mentioned. Applications to transfer larger amounts at the official rates are examined on the merits of each application.

Applications from emigrants to transfer funds in excess of the non-scheduled territory limit of £20,000 are authorised if they are judged to be necessary to ensure the applicant's freedom to take up his employment in the country concerned. The transfer of funds by reference to this criterion is allowed to residents taking up temporary employment.

On the question of the kind of regulations which might be necessary the position is that regulations will be necessary to deal with portfolio investment and these would operate from a period of five years after our accession.

It will not be necessary for us to do it until five years after our accession?

That is correct.

Question put and agreed to.
Agreed to take remaining Stages today.
Top
Share