Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 8 Dec 1981

Vol. 331 No. 7

Adjournment Debate. - Rosslare Strand Erosion.

On Thursday, 26 November 1981 I tabled a question to the Minister for Transport regarding Rosslare Strand erosion but unfortunately he was not present. My question asked when the Minister would instruct CIE either to carry out the necessary works or provide the necessary finance to Wexford County Council for essential protection works to alleviate coast erosion works at Rosslare Strand. The Minister for Fisheries and Forestry answered on behalf of the Minister for Transport and I quote an extract from his reply:

Despite protracted discussions with the parties concerned the question of responsibility for the cost of transporting the beach material to Rosslare Strand has not yet been resolved. I am arranging that an early meeting will be held by my Department with all the interests concerned with a view to resolving this problem and, pending a decision on the question of responsibility for the costs involved, that CIE will continue to provide and transport the necessary beach material to Rosslare Strand.

Wexford County Council have had major involvement with Rosslare Strand for a number of years. It is true that the building of a second berthage at Rosslare Harbour has been responsible for a further deterioration of coast protection work on the strand.

I would remind the Minister that when the National Coalition were in power the then Minister could have gone ahead with the building of a second berthage at Rosslare but, as is happening with the present administration, the then Government funked their responsibility. It was not until Fianna Fáil came to power after the National Coalition that the then Minister with responsibility for this matter, Deputy Faulkner, authorised that the work be done. It was a welcome development for the entire south east. The main reason for sanctioning this work was that Rosslare was the one port in Ireland where development work was increasing each year. There is no doubt that the work that was carried out proved a major success, certainly in regard to tourism.

I understand that in granting the licence to CIE and in giving them the necessary finance it was understood that CIE would provide the necessary materials for coastal protection at Rosslare Strand. This has not happened. Three years have passed but Rosslare Strand is eroding rapidly. I have with me a copy of the Wallingford Report that was commissioned to examine the feasibility of a second berthage at Rosslare Harbour. The report was an investigation into the effects of harbour improvements on beach movement and coastline changes. The following comments were made in the report:

The dumping of dredged material from Rosslare Harbour that took place on three occasions between 1964 and 1971 proved an effective form of beach replenishment building up the sand between the groynes, reducing the steepness of the beach slope and pushing the high water mark seaward...

The OPW have expressed the opinion that when their defences become increasingly more exposed to the waves as the sand is washed out of the groyne-compartments the woodwork will start to break up, and the position will get steadily worse so that the southern half of the Strand could soon lose material at an increasing rate unless some early beach replenishment can be carried out.

On page 10 of the report there is the following comment:

It would seem desirable to repeat this as soon as circumstances allow, in order to counter the normal beach "shortfall" of material.

The report also commented:

However, without such additional nourishment as was supplied in 1964-71 the material can only be removed from the existing beaches so that the present situation will deteriorate rapidly and the OPW sea defences will become progressively less effective so that the rate of erosion could build up again to the pre-1960 figure; releasing even more sand to enter Wexford Harbour and threatening the defence works at the Point itself. Any further destruction at Warren Lower townland could only add to the risk of floods at Wexford during periods of peak tidal levels.

A considerable amount of money has been spent by Wexford ratepayers on coastal protection works that were started in the early 1960s. These works are completely useless because the Minister has failed to tell CIE to provide the necessary materials, not only for the protection of Rosslare Strand but also Wexford town which is in danger of being flooded.

The Wallingford Report states:

In order to stabilise the situation on the beaches of Rosslare Bay some 27,000 m³/year of sand should be supplied; ideally to the whole length of the cliffs and the strand. However as the strand is the more important area economically and socially the preferred dumping zone would probably be off the Coastguard Station and if the sand could be placed on the beach directly this would be the most effective operation. If this was to be too expensive then consideration could be given to the use of split-bottom barges to try to place the sand as close as possible to the groyne-compartments.

The report also states:

It is recommended that beach nourishment of the Strand should continue and steps could also be taken to protect the South Bay cliffs west of Kilrane Halt.

This matter has been going on for three years and Wexford County Council have been pressing the Department for some time. It is important to highlight the situation of the ratepayers in Wexford. In 1963 the coast protection works were completed by the Office of Public Works and it fell to Wexford County Council to pay the bill. The maintenance cost in 1963 was £5,000 but the figures for the last five years are as follows: 1976 — £30,000; 1977 — £25,000; 1978 — £30,000; 1979 — £28,000; 1980 — £51,000; 1981 — £67,000. In that five-year period the ratepayers of Wexford have spent £231,000 on coast protection works.

Wexford County Council and the Office of Public Works are not able to cater for the present situation. A report by the county council engineer states that erosion at Rosslare Strand is proceeding at an alarming rate due to lack of nourishment and beach levels have been reduced by two to three feet in places. The cost of maintaining the present coast protection works is entirely a local charge and in the past few years there has been an increase of 123 per cent at a time when rate increases were limited to 32 per cent. The council are unable to meet the extra cost of beach nourishment because of rate restrictions and cannot provide the necessary material.

The joint policy document on the environment published by Fine Gael and Labour states that the national environment will be protected by a comprehensive plan which will ensure that economic development does not injure the environment. I would point out to the Minister that the environment in Rosslare Strand is being very severely affected.

On 27 November the Minister said that CIE would provide the necessary material and transport at Rosslare Strand. Wexford County Council had a meeting yesterday with representatives of CIE and CIE's chief civil engineer categorically denied that he knew anything about the reply the Minister gave regarding transport. Who is to pay for the transport from Rosslare Harbour to Rosslare Strand? The ratepayers cannot afford any more. Further erosion at Rosslare Strand will mean that the golf club will be divided in two and there is a danger of serious flooding in Wexford town. I want the Minister to guarantee that CIE will provide the necessary material amounting to 27,000 cubic metres of sand per annum. I ask the Minister to stand over the guarantee given in the reply on 27 November. CIE did not stand over it at the meeting yesterday. Wexford County Council have provided the infrastructure, the roads and services and CIE are not providing one penny. They are refusing to provide the necessary material to protect Rosslare Strand and Wexford town.

I want a guarantee from the Minister that not alone will CIE provide the material but they will provide it on Rosslare Strand where it is required so urgently and will continue to provide it not alone this year but for the foreseeable future. Because of the development of Rosslare Harbour it seems that we will have a continuation of the erosion of Rosslare Strand, therefore I want those guarantees tonight from the Minister.

The thrust of Deputy Allen's statement was to put the blame on CIE for the present position on Rosslare Strand. In particular he alleges that the serious erosion which is taking place — this is common case between us — is due to the building of the second berthage at Rosslare Harbour. Strictly speaking one could say that, but to understand the position we have to recall what the situation was before the second berth was built.

Prior to the building of the second berth CIE, in order to maintain the then harbour in a navigable condition, had to dredge on a regular basis and the dredged sand was deposited outside the harbour at a point where natural tide action washed it on to Rosslare Strand, thereby effecting continuous nourishment of this strand and so preventing erosion from taking place. As a result of the second berth being built the necessity for regular and continuous dredging was removed and, consequently, there was no ready supply of material to be washed naturally on to the strand. Therefore, the strand was subject to the eroding action of the tide and, obviously, that has a serious effect on the strand, unless the strand is replenished artificially.

The Deputy was at pains to make what appeared to be a political point when he said that the decision to build the second berth was not taken by the last National Coalition Government and that it fell to a Minister of the Fianna Fáil Party to have the necessary strength to make that decision. I am not aware of the reasons for it not being taken by the previous National Coalition Government but, unfortunately, when the decision was taken by Deputy Faulkner it was, like so many decisions of that administration, imperfect because it failed to provide specifically and exactly any responsibility for the ecological consequences of the engineering works that were to be carried out. It failed to provide specifically that any party would have a liability for the cost of provision and placing in position of the relevant material to protect the beach. That is why we are in trouble now. While we are at the business of making political points I remind the Deputy, since he raised the issue, that that regime which he supported and in which he served as a Minister of State failed during 1978, 1979, 1980 and the first half of 1981 to cure the problem which was the result of their own faulty decisions. It comes badly from the Deputy now to try to blame me in the short time that I have had the responsibility in this office for the unfortunate position that applies at Rosslare Strand.

I appreciate the seriousness of it and it is common case between us that this is a serious matter and because it is serious I will resolve this problem in a way that will obviate the danger to this strand. A confused legal situation exists as to liability to supply dredged material or make it available and supply nourishment to Rosslare Strand. This confusion stems from a faulty decision taken in 1978 in connection with the giving of permission for the construction of this second berth at Rosslare Harbour. It is not clear whether the nourishment required by the strand constitutes maintenance——

On a point of order——

You cannot raise a point of order.

On a point of information——

You can ask a question after the Minister has finished but you cannot interrupt him while he is speaking.

I was making the point that the situation as to where liability lies is confused. Is it maintenance under the Coast Protection Act? Is it something more than that? Obviously, a definitive discussion must take place between the three parties involved to try to determine where the liability lies. Is the legal position faulty and is any party or combination of parties going to accept the burden of the cost, the three parties being Wexford County Council, the OPW and CIE? I propose to arrange for urgent discussions between my Department and the three parties involved with a view to coming to a definitive decision on this problem. Pending that and because of the urgency of the situation, I have asked CIE, an autonomous State-sponsored body, in the language available to a Minister responsible for an autonomous State-sponsored body to provide dredged material for Rosslare Strand.

In Rosslare Strand?

On to Rosslare Strand but —I want to make it clear to Deputy Allen — that request is without prejudice as to the question of liability for paying CIE for that work. That question will have to be decided at this meeting that I hope to arrange between the three parties I have already mentioned. Let me emphasise that the very fact that I have asked CIE is without prejudice to the question of who is to pay for the job. An immense amount of material is now required urgently and the logistics of loading, moving and dumping it are quite formidable.

I am surprised to hear Deputy Allen's report of the meeting yesterday between Wexford County Council and a representative of CIE. It may well be that because of the present beet campaign there is an unusually heavy demand on CIE lorries and there may be a shortage of lorries at the moment. This is just a speculation on my part and I intend to tease out this matter because I am disappointed that the work of loading and spreading that material has not got under way before now.

I am conscious of the problem. I share the Deputy's concern as to the dimensions of it and the necessity to provide a solution. To provide a long-term and lasting solution I am convening a meeting of the parties to whom I have referred and in the short-term I am making what arrangements I can with CIE to provide material for the strand so as to prevent any further erosion pending a definitive solution.

I have just two straight questions. First of all I want to clarify for the Minister that I said that CIE refused yesterday to have anything to do with the last sentence of his first reply, which was that CIE would continue to provide and transport necessary beach material to Rosslare Strand. They have not done so and yesterday they refused to do so, but they will provide it in Rosslare Harbour if Wexford County Council will provide the transport. The second point——

We cannot have speeches now.

—— is that as far as the Board of Works are concerned the ratepayers of Wexford are paying them for any works that they carry out at Rosslare Strand.

The Dáil adjourned at 9 p.m. until 10.30 a.m. on Wednesday, 9 December 1981.

Top
Share