Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 19 May 1988

Vol. 380 No. 9

Ceisteanna — Questions. Oral Answers. - Garda Deployment.

3.

asked the Minister for Justice the number of gardaí allocated to each district; the ratio of gardaí allocated per head of population in each of these districts; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

I propose to circulate in the Official Report a tabular statement setting out the information sought in the question in so far as it is available.

As Garda administrative areas do not correspond to the local government areas used as a basis for the census of population, figures for the number of gardaí per head of population in each Garda district are not readily available. The compilation of such figures would require the diversion of gardaí from more pressing duties, which I consider would not be justified. However, the tabular statement gives the ratio of gardaí to population in the Dublin Metropolitan Area, in each of the Garda divisions in the rest of the country and in the State as a whole. It should be noted that the strength assigned to divisional headquarters stations includes specialist staff and units that operate on a divisional basis.

As regards the number of gardaí allocated to each district, it should be borne in mind that the number varies from time to time in the light of changing needs and circumstances. I also want to make the point that population is only one of a number of factors to be taken into account in assessing the police needs of any particular area. Any attempt to compare levels of police service in different areas would need to take account of other matters, including the overall resources available to an area, such as support staff, transport and other facilities, as well as the incidence of crime in that area and any special policing needs or problems that exist there. It would be seriously misleading to regard the ratio of gardaí to population in any area as any accurate measure of the level of Garda service provided for that area.

Following is the statement:

Division/District

Garda strength at 30 April 1988

Ratio of Garda strength to population

Carlow/Kildare

268

1: 595

Naas

102

Kildare

63

Carlow

64

Baltinglass

39

Cavan/Monaghan

444

1: 239

Monaghan

176

Bailieboro

56

Ballyconnell

62

Carrickmacross

89

Cavan

61

Clare

216

1: 423

Ennis

128

Ennistymon

30

Killaloe

32

Kilrush

26

Cork East

817

1: 359

Union Quay

310

Mayfield

118

Togher

104

Gurranabraher

81

Cobh

46

Fermoy

53

Midleton

56

Mallow

49

Cork West

240

1: 500

Bandon

84

Bantry

39

Clonakilty

44

Kanturk

37

Macroom

36

Donegal

506

1: 256

Letterkenny

197

Buncrana

100

Ballyshannon

121

Milford

43

Glenties

45

Galway West

313

1: 388

Galway

180

Clifden

27

Gort

31

Loughrea

43

Oughterard

32

Kerry

247

1: 502

Tralee

99

Caherciveen

39

Killarney

60

Listowel

49

Laois/Offaly

346

1: 327

Port Laoise

182

Abbeyleix

43

Birr

48

Tullamore

73

Limerick

530

1: 310

Henry Street

246

Roxboro

143

Askeaton

44

Newcastle West

55

Bruff

42

Longford/Westmeath

256

1: 372

Mullingar

89

Athlone

75

Granard

44

Longford

48

Louth/Meath

486

1: 469

Drogheda

87

Dundalk

160

Ceanannus Mór

49

Navan

63

Trim

69

Balbriggan

58

Mayo

265

1: 434

Castlebar

70

Ballina

51

Belmullet

22

Claremorris

48

Swinford

39

Westport

35

Roscommon/Galway (East)

247

1: 451

Roscommon

71

Ballinasloe

46

Boyle

33

Castlerea

38

Tuam

59

Sligo/Leitrim

275

1: 302

Sligo

117

Ballymote

33

Carrick-on-Shannon

38

Manorhamilton

87

Tipperary

288

1: 474

Thurles

65

Cahir

43

Clonmel

65

Nenagh

37

Templemore

41

Tipperary

37

Waterford/Kilkenny

316

1: 521

Waterford

130

Dungarvan

45

Kilkenny

75

Thomastown

31

Tramore

35

Wexford

265

1: 531

Wexford

80

Enniscorthy

33

Gorey

64

New Ross

37

Wicklow

51

Dublin Metropolitan Area

3,925

1: 266

Eastern Division

448

‘F’ District (Dún) Laoghaire

177

‘N’ District (Bray)

109

‘W’ District (Blackrock)

162

North Central Division

533

‘C’ District (Store Street)

184

‘U’ District (Fitzgibbon Street)

172

‘D’ District (Bridewell)

177

Northern Division

719

‘H’ District (Santry)

166

‘R’ District (Coolock)

190

‘J’ District (Raheny)

145

‘K’ District (Cabra)

217

South Central Division

867

‘A’ District (Kevin Street)

180

‘B’ District (Pearse Street)

490

‘E’ District (Donnybrook)

197

Southern Division

636

‘G’ District (Crumlin)

128

‘L’ District (Ballyfermot)

222

‘M’ District (Tallaght)

152

‘P’ District (Rathmines)

134

Dublin Area Headquarters

722

Garda Headquarters and Training Centre

726

National Ratio

10,976

1: 323

Taking into consideration that we will not have received the details of the tabular statement until the reply is available this evening, I would ask the Minister, on the basis of the crime ratio — and I am speaking mainly about my own constituency — if, in areas where crime has increased dramatically and the gardaí there would admit to being understaffed to deal with it and taking into consideration the reduced resources of the Garda nationally, it would not be of interest to everybody concerned to ensure that if there is an oversupply of gardaí in some areas, which I believe is the case, they should be transferred to the areas where crime has increased?

I very much accept the main thrust of the Deputy's question. Having regard to information available or experience gained by the Garda about the level of crime, if there is an increase in that level, these are factors which would be taken into account by the divisional commander of the force in the relevant area. That would then be the basis for his case to be put to the Garda authorities in Dublin for allocation of additional members of the force to help him to deal with the job that is there. Of course, if there are people in the force in an area where there is not a demand for them, or if there is a greater demand somewhere else, it is a matter for the Garda Commissioner to decide to transfer those people from where they may not be fully employed to areas where they are urgently needed and where they would be more than fully employed. These would, in my view, be matters for consideration by the Garda Commissioner in allocating the manpower available, which is his prime responsibility.

Would the Minister not accept that in areas of this country there are now no gardaí on the beat? Would he not accept also that there are other areas — and I am talking about main towns — where there are a number of gardaí on the beat trying to keep out of each other's way? Would he investigate the situation in regard to the Meath area where crime has increased and where last week there was a very serious robbery? The gardaí in the station——

May I appeal for brevity?

There were four other local stations and no gardaí available to go out and investigate the incident.

I would be quite prepared to bring the comments of Deputy Farrelly to the attention of the Garda Commissioner. If there is anything further the Deputy would like to add to what he has already said — although this might not necessarily be the place where he can do that because of the nature of the parliamentary question and the supplementary question — or if he feels that he has any further information that may have any significant bearing on the problem that he says exists, I would be more than happy to bring the matter to the attention of the Garda Commissioner.

He may not be happy about it.

A final short supplementary, a Cheann Comhairle. Would the Minister ask the Garda Commissioner seriously to look at redeployment of gardaí around the country, taking into consideration the increase in the crime rate? Perhaps he would give a report to the House in due course.

There was no recruitment in 1988.

The Deputy will be aware of recent statements made by me on the question of Garda reorganisation and comments made arising therefrom to the effect that the Garda Commissioner is looking at the situation as far as deployment of the force is concerned throughout all divisions, with a view to seeing that people are properly and gainfully employed. The Deputy will also know that I have expressed the viewpoint that where gardaí are involved in desk jobs — if I may use that phrase, the question of whether they should be allowed to continue doing desk jobs should be seriously looked at with a view to civilianising those jobs, so that we might get additional members of the force who are trained to be gardaí out on the streets doing the sort of work that we would all want them to be doing.

May I ask one supplementary question?

I shall take a brief question.

On the basis that Deputy Farrelly has referred to the Louth-Meath division, may I ask the Minister if he is satisfied with the appointment of a chief superintendent to the Louth-Meath region to be based in Dundalk with special responsibility for special assignments rather than the division itself?

The Deputy is raising a very particular matter worthy of a particular question.

This is in the light of the question as regards the adequacy of policing. Is the Minister satisfied with this?

Deputy Colley seems to have got her wires crossed a little. What she seems to accept is not the position. This matter was very fully dealt with in the Dáil last week when we had a half-hour's discussion and the matter was fully and satisfactorily explained to those who participated in the debate.

I call Question No. 4.

Who is actually running the Louth-Meath division?

The Minister, I presume.

The position in that division is the same as in any other division. There is one divisional commander and only one. That is the way it is and that is the way it is going to be.

I thought that the running of the Garda Síochána was a matter for the Garda Commissioner.

The Deputy is too smart.

At times he is too smart. In fairness to him, he can be very nice on occasions, too.

Top
Share