Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 7 Feb 1989

Vol. 386 No. 7

Adjournment Debate. - Cork Harbour Incident.

Thank you very much, a Cheann Comhairle, for giving me permission to raise this matter on the Adjournment. Thanks also to the junior Minister for making himself available at this late hour and for responding so readily to my request to have a full scale and thorough inquiry into the circumstances that led to this extraordinary incident last Sunday night in Cork Harbour.

Very briefly what happened was that a 5,000 tonne cargo ship bringing scrap iron from Le Havre to the Irish Steel plant in Haulbowline was entering Cork Harbour at about 9.20 p.m. last Sunday. At the point of entry to the harbour, when one would have thought that the ship would have been clearly positioned to enter the channel, to place itself between the navigational buoys and set itself on direct course for its destination, the ship veered southwards and ran aground on a sand bank wedged between rocks and the beach between Myrtleville and Fountainstown.

On the face of it, it would seem as if this was about the most spectacular nautical U-turn that has happened in the history of Cork Harbour. It is a matter of speculation in Cork as to how a ship that was geared to going in one direction found itself mysteriously in the opposite direction. I will quote in this context the comment of the local sergeant who was called to the scene of a ship on the rocks. He stated in The Cork Examiner of Monday, 6 February:

I have never known anything like this in my 25 years here. It is a mystery to me how the ship got into this position.

Indeed, it is a mystery to all of us, especially on a night when there was absolutely no fog and it is a mystery we would like to see unravelled.

Luckily the ship ran aground at a point where the sand was soft, narrowly missing jutting sharp rocks — rocks that have been described as razor sharp. I would remind the Minister that there was a gale force wind that night and had a gust of wind hit the ship at the point of impact, almost certainly that ship would have been wrecked off those razor sharp rocks, and we would have had in Cork Harbour a disaster almost on the scale of the Kowloon Bridge disaster. Luckily that did not happen. It has been said that luck strikes twice, and that was true on this occasion. Luckily the ship subsequently was refloated on a rising tide and was able to complete its course and arrive at its destination.

The explanation given the following day by the captain of the German-owned ship when queried on how the ship went so radically off course, was that there could have been a problem with the compass. That was his only explanation. The harbour master in response said that it — referring to the captain's explanation — certainly could have explained the problem especially if the ship was on auto-pilot. I have seldom seen so many "ifs" in any series of statements. Clearly this explanation is not acceptable to me or to anybody and must not be seen to be the final word on this issue. If it were to be the final word, there is no doubt that the harbour master and everybody connected with Cork Harbour could be accused of a degree of complacency that would be entirely out of character with the manner in which Cork Harbour has been managed for hundreds of years, and I certainly would not wish that to happen. That is exactly what happened and luckily a major disaster was averted.

What might have happened had a shipwreck taken place was that in one fell swoop some of the loveliest beaches in Cork Harbour, the beaches of Myrtleville and Fountainstown that are such firm favourites with the people of Cork city, and visitors, would have been ruined with the fuel oil that must have been on that ship — I refer to the bunker oil lest anybody get uneasy about this. The ship was not carrying a cargo of oil; it was carrying scrap steel, but nonetheless it must have had a complement of fuel oil which would have destroyed those beaches. The consequent result for fishing — it is a very good fishing area — and for wild fowl in the area would have been very serious and very severe. I would remind the Minister that we are talking about the general area of Crosshaven, an area world famous for its yachting and water activities. An accident of this nature in any location around our coast would be deplored, but doubly so if it had happened in this locality.

Cork Harbour has been the subject of much scrutiny of late by concerned citizens who are anxious and adamant to ensure that pollution levels are meticulously monitored and that adequate controls and safeguards are put in place. That is as it ought to be, but can you imagine what a slap in the face it would have been to these people and to all of us if the accident that was so narrowly and miraculously averted on Sunday night had taken place? The relevant authorities impose their own controls in Cork Harbour. Chemical companies in the harbour are obliged by law to ensure that all supplies of toxic materials are delivered by competent operators and in reliable vessels. That is an obligation that should be extended in law to all companies, and certainly to Irish Steel in regard to that part of the harbour.

On the south coast we have had in recent years more than our share of wrecks. On the lovely Coomeenole Beach in Kerry there are still the remains of a ship to haunt us because of our lack of foresight and our lack of legislation. Further eastwards there are the sad relics and remains of the Kowloon Bridge, leaving behind an issue that has not yet been settled by the Irish Government. Further east again, there are three wrecks despoiling the face of our coastline in Ardmore and Tramore, that is to mention but a few of the wrecks along our lovely coastline. Any wreck must be viewed with extreme concern by the Minister for the Marine, his Minister of State and everybody else. Let me put it simply, we have enough wrecks now, another would be one too many so every step must be taken to ensure that whatever happened on Sunday night will not be repeated. The word must go forth from our legislators that the kind of carelessness, neglect or whatever it was, that caused the ship to go aground is not being tolerated in our waters. I would not like it if one of our shipping agents tried a similar conduct in German waters. I do not think it would be acceptable or tolerated, and rightly so, and it ought not to be tolerated in Cork harbour or in any other harbour in this country, either. I appeal to the Minister to take the strongest possible line and to view this event, with all the potential hazards it had, with extreme seriousness and to order a full inquiry and to ensure that anything of this nature will not be allowed happen again, either advertently or inadvertently.

We have a harbour that has an oil refinery. We were very lucky that a tanker at the refinery did not find itself in similar circumstances. Can you imagine what the consequences for the whole south coast would have been had that happened? One way or the other I am asking the Minister to view the incident with extreme seriousness. Cork harbour and especially the city of Cork has as its motto statio bene side carinis which roughly translated means a good and safe harbour for ships. That is what we have in Cork, that is the tradition that has always been maintained in Cork. We have a harbour that has always been well managed and well monitored. We want to ensure that that standard is maintained, that no complacency of any kind will be allowed to creep in and that while the harbour continues to be safe for ships it will be no place for shipwrecks.

Tá áthas orm an deis a fháil anseo anocht freagra a thabhairt don Teachta Quill ar an cheist atá ar an Athló. Deputy Quill referred to the strongest possible line being taken. None of us welcomes the kind of incident that is the subject of this debate but when we have the opportunity of doing so, we want to put the record straight. I was very concerned on Sunday night when I got a telephone call from officials of my Department at midnight to say there was a problem in Cork harbour. Fortunately, because of the way the tide was, the problem was resolved three hours and some minutes afterwards.

The Brandaris was about a mile outside the mouth of Cork harbour at 22.00 hours on Sunday last. I was informed some one and a half hours afterwards of this event. The vessel is a 985 tonne cargo vessel, not a large vessel and was en-route from Le Havre to Haulbowline to deliver scrap metal to Irish Steel Limited. She was manned by a skipper and a crew of five. The harbour master was at the scene of the incident one hour later, at 23.00 hours, and interviewed the skipper. He also established that there was no threat either to life or to the environment. The hull had not been breached by the grounding, no water was being taken in and the ship was in a sheltered area. The ship was successfully refloated at high tide at 01.50 hours on Monday morning and it is at present offloading its cargo.

A surveyor from the marine survey office of my Department inspected the vessel and interviewed the skipper yesterday. As reported in the media the grounding was caused by a faulty gyrocompass. The vessel's certificates for safety construction, safety equipment, loadline and port state control were all in order. The vessel is three years old and, according to the report from the surveyor from my Department, exceptionally well founded.

Was the bridge manned at the time?

I hope to take up as much of my time as possible and to give the full facts. I will not be quoting from any of the local or national newspapers. The surveyor took statements from the skipper and crew. The skipper was instructed to arrange for the faulty equipment to be repaired and the inspector will be inspecting the vessel again before it leaves the harbour with a new cargo at the weekend. If the vessel is not considered to be seaworthy it will not be allowed to leave the port until such time as it is found to be seaworthy whether that takes days, weeks or months.

I note that Deputy Quill questioned whether the bridge of the Brandaris was manned at the time of the grounding. I can assure the Deputy that the surveyor from my Department is completely satisfied from his investigations that the bridge was manned at that time. If he were not so satisfied I would be arranging for my Department to hold an inquiry into the casualty in accordance with section 465 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1894. I would like to stress that our investigations show clearly that the occurrence was a genuine accident.

Since the establishment of the Department of the Marine and since we assumed office in March 1987, my Department have taken a special interest in the protection of the marine environment from pollution. I would refer the Deputy and the House to the Oil Pollution of the Sea (Civil Liability and Compensation) Act, 1988, which was enacted since we took office and also to the Sea Pollution Bill which is at an advanced stage and which I hope will come before this House if not in this session, certainly in the next session. I would refer also to the existing Acts, the Oil Pollution of the Sea Acts, 1956 to 1977. We have taken this action and I should point out that less than 12 months ago when a Nigerian vessel arrived here we had it inspected and found that it was not seaworthy. That vessel was detained by us for six weeks though we were under severe pressure from the fishing industry to release it. If we find that the position is similar here we will not allow the vessel to sail until such time as the compass is rectified.

I share Deputy Quill's concern about the threat of oil pollution to our coastline. I would point out that one cannot compare the Brandaris to the Kowloon Bridge. We are talking about 35 tonnes of light oil as against hundreds of tonnes of bunker oil on board the Kowloon Bridge. In referring to the Kowloon Bridge I would refer also to the Yarrawonga. I can assure Deputy Quill and the House that an immediate and co-ordinated response will be initiated in the unfortunate event of any oil pollution incident or threat of such an incident in that case. The action taken by the Government and by the Minister for the Marine in the Yarrawonga incident last month bears witness to our capability and commitment to respond immediately.

The action taken by this Government some few weeks ago is in sharp contrast to that taken by the previous Government. I am not accusing Deputy Quill because her party had not been founded at the time. The Deputy referred to the Kowloon Bridge disaster, and I believe that that is one incident that could have been averted. The action taken by this Government in the Yarrawonga incident is in sharp contrast to that taken at the time of the Kowloon Bridge disaster, a marine casualty that resulted in major pollution off the south coast. As I have said, this could have been averted if the then Administration had acted as expeditiously as the present Administration did. Fortunately, the boat lifted with the tide. However, if there had been a problem, we could have acted very quickly and very responsibly.

I appreciate the references the Deputy made to Myrtleville, to Fountainstown and to Crosshaven, but all I can say is that we were very pleased that there was no disaster. However, this is not to say that there will not be future disasters off our coastline, but we are committed to dealing with these as they might occur.

The Deputy was anxious for an inquiry into this matter. If I were not in a position to accept the evidence from the marine surveyor with regard to the manning of the bridge, then an inquiry would be necessary. Having looked at all the circumstances and the facts rather than quotations from the newspapers——

The vessel was a mile off course. The man at the bridge must have very bad eyesight.

——I believe the right action was taken. If this were not so, I would have urged on the Minister the necessity for an inquiry. However, having weighed all the facts and taken all matters into consideration, I believe that a full inquiry is not necessary and that it was a genuine accident.

The Dáil adjourned at 10.55 p.m. until 10.30 a.m. on Wednesday, 8 February 1989.

Top
Share