Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 9 May 1989

Vol. 389 No. 7

Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Planning Appeals.

3.

asked the Minister for the Environment if his attention has been drawn to the serious delays which are taking place within An Bord Pleanála because of the increase in the number of appeals; the steps, if any, he proposes to take to ensure that avoidable delays and other bureaucratic constraints can be removed in order to facilitate the speedy and effective processing of planning appeals, the resolution of which would result in productive development and consequential employment within the construction industry and if he will make a statement on the matter.

135.

asked the Minister for the Environment if his attention has been drawn to the long and unacceptable delays in obtaining decisions of planning appeals from An Bord Pleanála and the consequent obstruction which such delays are causing to building programmes due to staff shortages; the steps he proposes to take to eliminate these delays and facilitate the effective and orderly treatment of planning appeals for development projects; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

I propose to take Questions Nos. 3 and 135 together.

These are Priority Questions and co-operation is required to dispose of them within the time limit laid down in Standing Orders.

I am very concious of the need to ensure that there are no avoidable delays in the processing of appeals. My Department monitors the performance of An Bord Pleanála on an ongoing basis in relation to the number of appeals received, appeals disposed of and the time taken to process appeals.

In response to a request from me, the board undertook a review of procedures in mid-1988 and have indicated to me that they have tightened up their procedures in relation to time limits imposed on the various parties to an appeal to submit grounds for appeal and other documentation. Other steps taken include time effective measures on appeals against conditions in accordance with section 19 of the Local Government (Planning and Development) Act, 1983, and against vexatious appeals. Time targets set at my request by the board in 1988 to reduce a backlog from 1987 have been met. In this regard comparison between the figures for 1987 and 1988 are significant. The overall volume of appeals received in 1988 at 2,257 was somewhat less than the 1987 figure of 2,439, while at the same time the actual number of appeals disposed of by the board in 1988 was higher at 2,369 than the 1987 figure of 2,237.

I am having a general review of all planning regulations carried out by my Department and I will, upon making consolidated regulations later this year, take the opportunity to further streamline procedures to further improve the operation of the planning system.

I presume that in the absence of Deputy Quinn I cannot put a supplementary to the Minister's response.

That is not in order. Question No. 4.

Top
Share