Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 14 Feb 1991

Vol. 405 No. 2

Ceisteanna — Questions. Oral Answers. - Gulf Conflict.

Michael D. Higgins

Question:

2 Mr. M. Higgins asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if he will make a statement on any initiatives Ireland, as a neutral nation, is willing to take to secure a speedy end to the Gulf war; if he will outline the position taken by Ireland in discussions within the European Community towards securing the basis of a negotiated settlement; and if he will further outline the measures Ireland will take to provide medical or humanitarian assistance to the victims of the war.

Proinsias De Rossa

Question:

18 Proinsias De Rossa asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if he will outline the discussions which have taken place in the EC Council of Foreign Ministers on the Gulf war since the outbreak of hostilities; if the Council is planning any peace initiative; and if he will outline the position of the Government in this regard.

I propose to take Questions Nos. 2 and 18 together.

Deputies will join with me in regretting profoundly the loss of human life and the destruction which is resulting from the war in the Gulf. I particularly regret the major loss of life which has resulted from the bombing of the shelter in Baghdad, on which we had reports yesterday. Incidents of this kind underline the urgency of securing a speedy end to the war.

Any initiatives to secure a speedy end to the Gulf war will have a chance of success only if it is based on compliance by Iraq with the resolutions of the UN Security Council, that is, to say, it must involve a decision on the part of Iraq to withdraw from Kuwait. Unfortunately, there is as yet no sign that the Government of Iraq are prepared to do this and to conform to the rule of law as represented by the United Nations Charter and the relevant resolutions of the Security Council. In these circumstances, I do not consider that any initiative on my part or on the part of the Community would have any chance of success at the present time.

The principles underlying Ireland's approach to the Gulf crisis were set out clearly in the Taoiseach's speech as well as in my own in this House on 18 January last. Ireland believes in the peaceful settlement of disputes between nations, and looks to the United Nations to maintain the rule of law in relations between states. We had hoped that the unprecedented international consensus against the invasion together with the implementation of sanctions would have been sufficient to secure a peaceful solution to the crisis. In discussions within the European Ccommunity, Ireland has emphasised that the first priority is to end the war but that the crisis can be resolved only on the basis of the Security Council Resolutions. Frankly, I can see no room for negotiation on the substance of the resolutions. Iraq must withdraw from Kuwait and the Government of Kuwait must be restored. While not seeking to link the Gulf crisis with the other problems of the region, Ireland considers that consideration of measures to resolve the Palestinian problem and the Arab-Israeli conflict should not be further delayed.

The Community and its member states have given special attention to the Gulf crisis since its onset, with Iraq's invasion of Kuwait on 2 August 1990. As I told this House on 18 January, there were three extraordinary ministerial meetings during the period of August and early September alone. There were four such meetings last month. The Community's efforts were directed at avoiding the recourse to military action, while fully respecting the Security Council Resolutions. With these objectives in mind, during August 1990, when I was a member of the Community Troika, I participated in a Community mission to Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Egypt to press the case for an effective sanctions regime as an alternative to the need for military action.

The Community made every effort to persuade Iraq to draw back from the confrontation it had provoked. However, every successive Community approach was rebuffed. It is this obduracy on the part of the Iraqi leadership which has made war inevitable.

I have carefully monitored the reports from Moscow, Baghdad and Belgrade concerning initiatives by the Soviet Union and the leadership of the nonaligned movement to bring the war to an end. Deputies will join with me in wishing these initiatives every success. However, I fail to find any reported indication of a sign of willingness by the Government of Iraq to address the root cause of the conflict, the invasion of Kuwait. I must, therefore, echo the words of UN Secretary General, Perez de Cuellar, that there is, at any rate as yet, little that is new in these latest reports and that it remains true that a solution is possible only on the basis of compliance by Iraq with the Security Council Resolutions.

In relation to assistance to victims of the war, the Government are keeping the situation closely under review and are studying appeals for funding from the United Nations Disaster Relief Organisation (UNDRO) and the International Committee of the Red Cross in respect of detailed plans for assisting large numbers of refugees. To date, refugee numbers have been limited.

Arising from the Minister's reference to the tragic loss of thousands of civilian lives in the past few days, has he discussed the issue of civilian deaths with the United States Ambassador? Does he now consider that the UN mandate has been exceeded? Did the political director of the Department of Foreign Affairs when in Moscow recently discuss the Primakov initiative? Do the Government intend to wring their hands on the sidelines rather than be an active participant in initiatives?

The answer to the first part of the Deputy's question is no. We have had quite a discussion on it within the European Community and the Community position is known on that issue. With regard to the second part of the question, the Deputy will know that there is a special meeting today of the United Nations Security Council where that issue will be discussed by the selfsame members who have given the mandate the Deputy has mentioned.

Regarding the third element of the Deputy's question, the political director of the Department of Foreign Affairs returned home at lunchtime today and, as yet, I have not had an opportunity to be briefed by him on his visit to Moscow and his discussions there.

Time for Priority Questions is well nigh exhausted. I had hoped to deal with Question No. 3. If I am to deal with Question No. 3 it must be taken now.

You always have my assistance. I would ask for one final supplementary.

We are constricted by time.

I accept that, but I want to ask a brief supplementary of the Minister. In view of the Minister's reference to civilian casualties, what system is he using to count the number of civilians who are being killed and what assurance can he give the House that the planes refuelling at Shannon, for which he and his Government have given permission, are not carrying the bombs which are dropping on civilians in Baghdad?

The Deputy knows, as do all Members of this House, that there is not a system available to us for the counting of civilian casualties during this war. We all have to depend on reports from different sources and try to make the best assessment we can. The Deputy knows that is the system. With regard to the second part of the question, I would refer the Deputy to the statement made by the Taoiseach in this House where the position of this Government and the country was fully explained and accepted by the overwhelming majority of Members.

The Minister has not answered in regard to Shannon.

Can we have the temerity to hear the reply to Question No. 3?

On a point of order, I wish to put on record my protest that because of the rules of this House I am unable to put a supplementary question on Question No. 18 which the Minister has taken with Question No. 2.

That is a well known factor in this House.

It is a factor that should be changed.

The Deputy may well frustrate the taking of the third question.

Top
Share