Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 26 Nov 1991

Vol. 413 No. 5

Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Intimidation of Garda.

Eric J. Byrne

Question:

10 Mr. Byrne asked the Minister for Justice if, in the light of the award of £196,500 made by the High Court on 18 November 1991 to a Garda attached to the Carriage Office, who was subjected to a campaign of intimidation and threats after refusing to take part in the issuing of bogus taxi licences, he will outline the steps which were taken to identify those responsible for this campaign; the disciplinary or other steps which were taken against those involved; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

For the purpose of dealing fully with the Deputy's question I think it would be helpful if I were to distinguish between the steps taken in relation to the irregularities which occurred in the Carriage Office and those taken in relation to the intimidation and threats which followed.

I am informed by the Garda authorities that the irregularities in the Carriage Office referred to in the question first came to light in September 1982. Following an internal investigation by the Garda authorities criminal proceedings were instituted against four members of the Force resulting in three convictions. One of the three members convicted had retired before the court proceedings and two were dismissed from the Force following their convictions. The fourth member concerned was found to have been in breach of disciplinary regulations and a penalty was imposed under those regulations. I am informed by the Garda authorities that following the occurrences referred to in the question, revised procedures and arrangements were introduced in the Carriage Office and that these are working satisfactorily.

With regard to the intimidation and threats I understand from the Garda authorities that these were made by way of anonymous letters and telephone calls. The matter was fully investigated but it was not possible to obtain sufficient evidence to initiate proceedings.

I should say at this point, that it has never been the practice to disclose publicly, details of Garda investigations or of the outcome of Garda disciplinary proceedings, which under the regulations in question are required to be held in private, save in singular instances where there are exceptional circumstances such as to warrant a departure from that practice. I am satisfied that the disclosure to the House of the information I have just given is warranted in the quite exceptional circumstances existing in this instance.

This was a very disturbing and tragic case for the affected garda. Is the Minister satisfied that all the forged taxi licences have been accounted for? Given that the forged licences in 1981, when the event occurred, were valued at approximately £5,000 and that licences are now valued at £30,000 to £40,000, has the Minister taken sufficient steps in the Carriage Office to prevent a recurrence of these events? Will the Minister comment on reports that there are mixed views in the senior ranks of the Garda about large settlements to gardaí, that gardaí are doing their duty and they might question the large settlements?

I will not comment on what the Deputy says about settlements to the gardaí. I am assured by the Garda authorities that following the occurrences referred to in the question, revised procedures and arrangements were introduced in the Carriage Office immediately and that these are now working satisfactorily. With regard to the licences, I do not have that information available to me but I will get it and I will communicate with the Deputy.

While the Garda investigations were not sufficient to bring a case for prosecution do the indications obtained in that investigation show that the intimidation of the unfortunate member who was compensated by the High Court came from within or from outside the force?

It would be quite improper to comment on that as sufficient evidence was not procured on which to initiate proceedings. It would be improper to speculate.

What were the indications?

Is there any provision in the regulations whereby gardaí who obtain money through false pretences have to return the money and was the money in this case which was collected for the issue of bogus taxi licences returned?

The Deputy will have to ask me a specific question.

Does the Minister think it should be returned?

Question No. 11 please.

Top
Share