I propose to take Questions Nos. 35 and 75 together.
I have examined the question of an amnesty of this kind, having regard to the advantages that could ensue for interest rates and tax revenues should it succeed in attracting back funds diverted outside the State in the past, in order to evade taxation. That examination highlighted two major difficulties, such that the possibility of its being counterproductive in these terms has to be considered. First, an amnesty confined to funds abroad would entail a substantial inducement to persons with undeclared funds within the State to transfer these abroad, in order to avail of such an amnesty. Secondly, if the scope of the amnesty was wide enough to overcome the difficulty, it could prove a major impediment to the efforts of the Revenue Commissioners to tackle tax evasion and to collect outstanding arrears.