Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 13 May 1992

Vol. 419 No. 6

Housing (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill, 1992: Second Stage (Resumed).

Question again proposed: "That the Bill be now read a Second Time."

When the debate adjourned I was talking about voluntary housing bodies. I am glad that the Minister is devolving to local authorities his function in relation to the approval of voluntary housing bodies. That will give local authorities closer links with voluntary bodies from the beginning, a move that has positive implications for both local authorities and voluntary groups.

In relation to the shared ownership proposal, it is right to emphasise that most people wish to own their own home. I welcome the measures contained in the Bill to facilitate people to become home owners.

At the moment local authorities have approximately 96,000 individual houses, valued at more than £3 billion. More than £70 million is spent each year maintaining those houses. That is an immense allocation of resources and represents a commitment to provide for those in the community who are unable to provide themselves with permanent housing. That being said, there can be no doubt that there is a need for continued action in this area, arising particularly from the recent increase in the number needing housing assistance. This is a particular need that I am concerned about. It is a matter requiring deep consideration. We should be particularly conscious of the location of houses built in the various counties. That is the reason that earlier this week I highlighted the special housing needs of Dunboyne in south County Meath.

The scheme for improvement works in lieu of rehousing is a good measure that will, it is hoped, make sure that people are not unnecessarily forced to seek rehousing. The scheme recognises that about 45 per cent of those who are approved for rehousing come from unfit, unsuitable or overcrowded accommodation. There is no doubt that many people in that position would prefer to remain in their own home and have their home renovated if the necessary funds were available. The proposal is a good one, not only for the applicant but also for the taxpayer. I hope it will be developed further.

I also welcome the measures contained in sections 15 to 20, which give tenants in the private rental sector greater security. These measures will be welcomed by many people renting private accommodation. The specific provisions that relate to rent books, standards for rented houses and the registration of buildings are desirable.

Before concluding, I again totally reject the allegations made in the House earlier today by Deputy Farrelly. The Deputy does nothing for himself or his party by making such inaccurate allegations. I am sure he does nothing either to enhance his relationship with his party Leader, Deputy John Bruton, who hails from Dunboyne. As Chairman of Meath County Council, Deputy Farrelly should try to identify and recognise the special needs of the people of Dunboyne. Instead, he chose today to ignore their needs and their appeal for locating local authority houses in Dunboyne and to attack myself and other Fianna Fáil Deputies from County Meath. I completely refute his accusations of double standards. I put it to the Deputy that he has no standards and no record of achievement on behalf of the people he purports to represent. Deputy Farrelly attacked me and the other Fianna Fáil TDs from County Meath for highlighting issues of concern to our constituents which is what we have done this week. The issue raised concerned the location of housing in the county and the need to locate at least four of the 25 houses being built this year in the Dunboyne parish. The Deputy's inaccurate statements in the House in relation to the "Pat Kenny Show" do nothing for him or his constituents. Again I refute and reject those statements on behalf of myself and my colleagues.

As a final remark, I should like to reiterate my belief that the Bill and the plan for social housing are imaginative and flexible. The Minister is doing a good job in trying to identify the other areas that can be developed to encourage and to assist people on the housing lists. In view of the financial constraints which face this Government and will face other Governments, the plan for social housing and the legislation before us is good. I hope the Department and the local authorities will work actively to encourage participation in the schemes set out in the Bill.

I will refrain from entering the discussion between the two Meath Deputies about whatever misunderstanding has arisen between them. I can understand how those things can happen. I am sure the Deputies will resolve their differences.

I listended with interest to Deputy Callely. He started off promisingly and I thought I would hear a good contribution. Perhaps the Deputy thought it was his duty to castigate Opposition speakers for what he called their negative contributions, for putting on the record the housing crisis as they saw it. It was a pity he went down that road because otherwise he would have made a good contribution. Having praised the Bill and the Minister, the Deputy then told the Minister and his officials what he thought was wrong with the Bill and what could be put right. He drifted into the same trap that we on this side of the House are inclined to drift into.

I am going to anticipate the Deputy and tell Deputy McCormack that I am quite sure he will not drift into that net.

I hope not. In reply to Deputy Callely, I would say that money has not been spent in the west on protecting empty houses. The Deputy referred to money being spent in the mideighties in Dublin to protect empty houses. We had no such luxury in the west. The only empty houses in the west were as a result of families being forced to emigrate due to the policies of this Government and to unemployment. Deputy Callely took great pleasure in quoting the first paragraph in the introduction to the Plan for Social Housing where it states that the Government are committed to pursuing housing policies with the broad objective of ensuring that every household has a dwelling suitable to its needs, located in an acceptable environment, and at a price or rent it can afford. That is a beautiful aspiration, but it is only an aspiration. People dealing with the housing crisis have painted an entirley different picture. That might be the objective of the Government and of the Plan for Social Housing but the Minister and the Government will have to be honest and say that that is only an objective without any possibility of being realised. That is a most misleading opening paragraph to the plan.

There are some laudable objectives in the Bill and perhaps there will be some benefit from some of its aspects, but it will not solve the housing crisis. Lack of capital is causing the crisis. In the meantime, the housing lists are getting longer and existing housing stock is losing value. While people are waiting for houses they are being forced to live in unsuitable accommodation. It is having a devastating effect on families. It is leading to social problems, to family breakdown and to marriage breakdown. This is too high a price to pay for the lack of finance for the housing programme.

Deputy Callely appealed to Opposition spokespeople not to refer to the capital allocation for housing. Perhaps he is embarrassed by having the figures put on record. However, the kernel of the problem revolves around the capital allocation for housing. To get this into perspective, the entire capital allocation for housing in 1991 was £43 million and in 1992 it was reduced to £41 million. That might sound like a big figure but to get it into further perspective we have to go back in history, despite Deputy Callely's appeal. Deputy Wallace challenged Deputy Callely and I will take up the challenge to illustrate what we did about housing.

In 1992 the housing capital allocation was £41 million whereas in 1984 there was a capital allocation of £206.558 million for housing. In case Deputies think I am picking a particularly good year, in 1985 the capital allocation was £197,670,000 for housing. This was when my party were part of the Government. That is the stark reality. I am a member of two local authorities in County Galway and to bring it further into perspective I will give the capital allocation for housing now compared to what it was when we were building houses and dealing with the housing waiting lists. For example, in 1983 in the Galway Borough area we received £3.5 million for the provision of houses from the then Government and we built 85 houses. Again under the then Coalition Government in 1984 we received a capital allocation of £4.32 million and built 122 houses. I am talking about Galway city alone. In 1985 we received a capital allocation of £2.6 million and built 72 houses. In 1986 our capital allocation was £2.13 million and we built 68 houses. In 1987, when the previous Fianna Fáil Government were in office, we received the miserly sum of £210,000 and we built no houses. In 1989 we received £750,000, comprised mainly of a grant solely for the provision of halting sites for itinerants in our city. That will give the House an idea of the housing situation that prevailed in Galway city previously compared with the present day.

The position is no better in the county area. For example, in Galway County Council area we received £4.5 million in 1986, and provided 219 houses — valuable housing schemes for all the rural towns of County Galway, such as Oughterard, Headford, Clifden, Athenry, Gort, Loughrea, Clarinbridge, Craughwell, to retain people in those rural areas. That was the correct policy for the then Government to pursue. I was proud to be a member of the party whose Government provided the necessary finance for the provision of houses for people on the housing waiting lists. I am not ashamed to put those facts on the record as a true and accurate account of what occurred in housing when my party were in Government compared with what is now happening.

On Monday last I attended a special meeting of Galway County Council devoted entirely to the housing position overall within the county. Having received our allocation for this year and made provision for hard stands, for the completion of a few houses in course of construction last year and for the preparation of some sites, we had a net sum of £446,000 remaining for the building of new houses within the county this year which would build approximately ten houses. Now we have in excess of 400 people on the housing waiting lists in County Galway, people in dire need and who have no possibility of building houses for themselves. I heard Deputy Rabbitte say that Dublin County Council had received an allocation for 72 houses they were unable to build, that the Minister was able to inform them, on a deputation, that they had not succeeded in spending all of that allocation. That is not the case in County Galway nor indeed in Galway city. In County Galway land has been acquired and housing schemes have been prepared for all of the towns and villages throughout the county. In excess of 120 people have been sanctioned for once-off rural dwellings to be built on their own sites, which have already been transferred to the local authority, who may or may not succeed in building those dwellings. Galway County Council have so far given the go-ahead for the building of five rural dwellings, that is five from a long list of people who have had their sites transferred to Galway County Council for the past five or six years, all legal aspects and so on being in order. Yet Galway County Council simply await the requisite finance to build houses for those people in dire need of them.

In the case of Galway city we have received an allocation of sufficient money to build approximately 22 houses this year. At present there are 22 houses being completed, the first to be built and completed by Galway Corporation over the past three years. The only other scheme built about three years ago was the valuable in-fill scheme for old people in Whitehall, in a designated area, thus bringing people back to live in the viable inner city area. It is a showpiece comprising approximately 16 one and two-bedroom apartment-type houses. I would invite anybody visiting Galway to view that scheme, to see how those people have been reintegrated into the city centre. Those were the only houses built over the past three and a half years by the previous Fianna Fáil Government and indeed under the present Coalition Government.

People I meet in the street or who come to my clinics often ask — and I feel it my duty to put this question on their behalf as their public representative: how is it that in Galway west, where there are two full Cabinet Ministers and previously a Minister of State, we are unable to obtain a better allocation of houses? Those two Ministers sit around the Cabinet table, one representing the larger party in Government, the other representing what they like to be called, the powerful party in Government. Why are they unable to obtain a better allocation of money for the provision of houses for the people of Galway city? In fact both Ministers were members of Galway Corporation. I had a hard task convincing them to resign their membership and leave it to ordinary members but one continued as a junior Minister and the other as a full Minister for a number of years. Since the last local elections they no longer serve on the local authority. I am sure they receive the same message I do at clinics about the dire need for houses in Galway city.

As bad as is the position in the county it is more acute in the city. There are now several families living in one local authority house, causing great social problems. Housing conditions in rural areas, in some cases, may be even worse, with no sanitary services and so on. But, within Galway city urban area, there are in excess of 400 families, representing approximately 1,600 or 1,700 people on the waiting lists in dire need of housing. The first houses to have been built in the past three and a half to four years are now being completed in Castle Park. Always at the weekend when I return home there are people waiting to see me to inquire what is the possibility of their receiving a house. I know in my heart and soul that 90 per cent of the people who come to me, and I assume to every other public representative, have not even a possibility of being given a house, and that they must continue to suffer on in their present circumstances.

Perhaps I could transmit, through the Minister of State, Deputy Wallace some advice to the Minister about this Bill, its provisions and housing in general. I predict people will not avail of all of the fancy, complex schemes proposed under the provisions of this Bill or in the plan for social housing and any other documents since produced. The Department have made every effort to explain the options, housing choices and so on with very good literature and documentation but I do not think they will be taken up. The reason is that they are not practical schemes and are regarded by 95 per cent of the people on waiting lists as such. These schemes will not take people off the housing waiting lists and provide them with proper accommodation. Neither will they achieve the objectives set out in the document, "A Plan for Social Housing", to ensure that every household has a dwelling suitable to its needs, located in an acceptable environment, at a price or rent it can afford.

My advice to the Minister, his officials and the Government is that they should concentrate on two schemes. First, they should reintroduce the fixed interest loan scheme which was operated by local authorities. That scheme was abolished by a previous Fianna Fáil Government. People who wanted to build or buy their own houses were not afraid to look for a loan as they knew that the interest rate would be fixed at, say, 10 per cent. These loans enabled people to build or buy their own houses, the biggest financial commitment entered into by most people. The reintroduction of this scheme would encourage people to again build or buy their own houses.

Second, a grant of £6,000 should be given to first-time buyers or builders of new houses. People who buy or build new houses are starting off in life and they do not have the necessary finance or the ability to raise money. A grant of £6,000 — I picked that figure at random — would encourage many people to build or buy their own houses. The reason there are so many people on housing waiting lists is that people who only five or six years ago would have been able to buy or build their own houses are not in a position to do so as they are not getting any help or encouragement.

Over the past ten years Galway local authorities acquired much serviced land for housing schemes. They drew up plans and submitted them to the Department. Those plans would meet with their housing requirements for the next ten or 12 years. I compliment the officials in Galway Corporation and Galway County Council for having their affairs in order and if the necessary finance was made available they would be able to start building the houses immediately.

I wish to refer to a housing scheme built at Castlepark in Galway city in the mid-eighties. Castlepark is on top of the hill at the back of the Corrib Great Southern Hotel. It would do anyone good to look at this housing scheme and I invite the Minister to visit it.

The Deputy will be glad to know I have seen the estate.

I am glad. The view from Castlepark is one of the most magnificent in Galway city — it overlooks Galway Bay and the Clare hills. Between 1984 and 1986, 334 houses were built in this area. People were delighted to get a house there. At the same time money was being allocated for houses and the number of people on the housing waiting list was reduced to single figures. Fifteen or 20 years ago 20 houses were built in Hillside park, which is adjacent to Castlepark. That scheme should have worked. Galway Corporation have a good record in the provision of facilities for travelling people — they built 22 houses in Hillside Park, have housed more than 100 travelling families and built four hard stands in the city and one on the outskirts. When the concept of the Hillside Park village was first mooted a guarantee was given that the travelling people living there would not be allowed to keep horses, dogs or caravans there.

Section 10 (1) states:

Where, without lawful authority, a person erects, places, occupies or otherwise retains a temporary dwelling in a public place within a distance of two miles from any site provided, managed or controlled by a housing authority under section 13 of the Act of 1988 and the temporary dwelling could, in the opinion of the authority, appropriately be accommodated on that site, the authority may serve a notice on the person requiring him, within a specific period, to remove the said dwelling to the said site.

While I welcome this provision I should like the Minister to say what will happen if all the hard stand sites are filled. There are about 85 — I counted them last week — illegally parked caravans in the Castlepark-Hillside Park area.

The Minister should visit the area to see the shanty-type town which has grown up there. The itinerants living there have moved from other local authority areas. Those authorities did not play their part in providing hard stands or accommodation for travellers in their areas. The Minister should look at the provision of facilities for travellers.

These itinerants have brought their horses and goats with them and have allowed them wander freely in the area. They are as much trouble to the settled travellers in the Hillside area as they are to the other residents of the area. These animals are allowed to wander all over the place, destroying what was the most outstanding local authority housing scheme, certainly the most outstanding scenic site that I have seen. That is just one example of what is happening in the Castlepark area where the houses are not yet ten years old. People are losing all confidence in the local authority to solve their problem in that horses are terrorising children, interfering with gardens and goats are jumping over walls.

At the back of the Corrib Great Southern Hotel is situated St. John Paul's school which caters for the needs of the mentally handicapped of the area. Very extensive landscaping was carried out in that area, but it has been almost completely destroyed by horses and goats. I was responsible for getting from the NBA, who designed the scheme of houses, £1,000 for the planting of hardwood trees. These trees were planted in a circular area and, if allowed develop, would have created a beautiful amenity. The whole area was fenced in, but it is now completely destroyed. I might as well have got a cheque for £1,000 from the NBA and thrown it ceremoniously into Galway harbour. I would have achieved more by doing so because the general public, seeing what is allowed to happen are losing all confidence in the authorities.

I raised this matter on the Adjournment last week and the Minister for Justice replied by saying that he recognised my concern about wandering horses in the Castlepark area but that the position was under control. The position is no more under control than I am in control of what the Minister has said. The horses are still wandering in that area. Three weeks ago the corporation brought a number of horses to the pound in Portlaoise but mysteriously that night they were illegally released and were back on the streets of Castlepark the next evening.

I am alluding to that matter from the point of view of the wastage of the resources that have been put into housing in Galway and other areas. Some people in the area bought houses under the tenant purchase scheme. The Minister should consider reintroducing that scheme which presented an ideal opportunity for tenants of local authority houses to acquire their own property. In the Castlepark area there are now "For Sale" signs on a number of houses. People who were breaking their necks to get into Castlepark and who were delighted to have been allocated houses there at the time, are now breaking their necks to get out of the area. The community there was a first-class community which, on its own initiative, built a community centre — Ballybane community centre — a worthwhile facility that does not exist in my own area of Renmore. At the entrance to the community centre caravans are now parked and neither children nor adults can go there in safety. The whole spirit of the community has been destroyed by inaction, or apparent inability by the local authority to do anything about the matter. The local authority tell me that they bring horses to the pound, but to take a horse legally out of the pound costs only £18. Therefore, these people have no problem getting their horses back.

At present, shanty-type sheds are being erected in the area. I would draw this to the attention of Galway Corporation: if I erected in my back garden a shed which did not comply with planning regulations, I would be rightly asked by the planning office to either apply for retention or to remove the shed. Yet within 150 yards of the Corrib Great Southern Hotel — the refurbishment of which cost £6.5 million — a hotel that attracts international conferences, which are very welcome, these buildings are being erected without restriction. This is destroying the spirit of the people in this corporation housing estate.

When those houses were built they were very good value for money because a social problem was solved. However, a greater social problem is now being created and I do not know what can be done about it. Galway Corporation meet on a regular basis with a view to solving the problem. I attended a meeting recently in Hillside Park at which the settled travelling community were present. These people are as concerned about this problem as are the people of Castlepark and elsewhere.

Throughout Galway city, well-run, well-kept hard-stands have been built, three of which are in my electoral area. These hard-stands provide suitable accommodation for travellers who are waiting to move into houses. Many of these travellers who come to visit me at my clinic and in my home are first-class people who are on the housing waiting list but have no possibility of getting a house unless finance is provided. By not providing the necessary finance we are defeating the purpose we set out to achieve ten or 12 years ago, when we provided hard-stands for travelling people.

We are not getting value for the millions of pounds allocated to Galway Corporation — £4.5 million in one year and £3.5 million in another year — for the building of houses in areas such as Castlepark because law and order has been allowed to break down there. People are losing all respect for authority and for the corporation. They are losing the pride they had in maintaining their area and their houses and in building up a viable, worthwhile community. All the useful work which improved the standards of the lives of those people is now being undone because of the apparent neglect of the area by the authorities. I hope the Minister will be able to spell out clearly how section 10 of the Bill can be implemented. It is only a pious aspiration, not worth the paper it is written on. One cannot move caravans unless there is a vacant position on a hard site.

Debate adjourned.
Top
Share