Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 23 Mar 1993

Vol. 428 No. 1

Adjournment Debate. - State Shareholding in Greencore.

I am grateful to you, Sir, for allowing me to raise this matter. It is fortuitous that it should come up for discussion the evening before the deadline expires for the making of bids for the Government's remaining shareholding in Greencore. During the course of statements in this House on 3 March last the Minister for Finance sought to put a particular gloss on the interest being expressed by the company, ADM, in the acquisition of the Government's remaining shareholding in Greencore. According to the Minister for Finance on that date the prospecting of ADM was carried out by executives of Greencore, apparently during the latter half of the year and unknown either to the Minister for Finance or to his Department until 16 February last.

There is a very healthy respect in food industry circles in this country for ADM; this is the respect which any group of operators would have for a well run and agile competitor. ADM is a major manufacturer and trader of both sugar substitutes and cereal substitutes. It has a strong record of growth and acquisition and already has a substantial presence in the Irish market. It is not surprising there is disquiet in agri-industry circles in this country at the prospect that 30 per cent of shares in that company might pass into ADM's control. Nor is it surprising that the sugar beet producers are concerned at the prospects that 30 per cent of the shareholding in the monopoly sugar processing company, the only outlet for their product, might pass into the hands of a major manufacturer of sugar substitutes. It is worrying, therefore, that we may not have been told the whole story about the matter. The Minister for Agriculture, Food and Forestry, Deputy Joe Walsh, spoke on these issues in the House on 3 March last but made no reference to the fact that he, together with the secretary of his Department and a senior executive of the IDA, met executives of ADM in the United States in May of last year. In the light of all the concerns expressed both inside and outside this House we are entitled to expect some account from the Minister.

I would like to know the answers to the following questions. At whose initiative did that meeting take place? What transpired at the meeting? Were any decisions or undertakings made during the course of that meeting, and if so, what were they? Did the meeting have any bearing on or any connection with Greencore's solicitation of an interest by ADM? By what right did executives of Greencore solicit interest in the Government's remaining shareholding? Can we really believe that this was done without the express or implied approval of the Government? Did the Minister or his Department inform either the Minister for Finance and his Department or indeed the Government of what led to that meeting; what transpired at it and what resulted from it? What is the significance of the statement of the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Forestry last evening that he would now like to see an Irish headquartered company where previously he was talking about a preference for an Irish company? Finally, I would like to know if the Minister withheld from the House information relevant to the debate that took place on 3 March 1993 and, if so, why?

I take the strongest exception to this attempt by Deputy Dukes to besmirch my good name, that of the Secretary of my Department and that of a top IDA executive. The record of this House shows the Deputy's lack of respect for fellow Members but on this occasion he has gone too far. I must ask him to have the good grace to withdraw his baseless allegations about my meetings in the US last May.

There are questions which the Minister must answer.

The meeting referred to by the Deputy was part of a five day promotional trip to the US which I made with the secretary of my Department and a senior IDA official in May 1992, during which I met a number of large food and other manufacturing companies. The purpose was to encourage the firms concerned to locate in Ireland or, where they already had a presence in Ireland, to expand their business here. In the case of Archer, Daniels Midland, ADM, I met senior executives and discussed with them the possibility of increasing their existing production base in Ireland and- or of making Ireland the base for future production still at the development stage.

Questions of any link with Greencore or of the disposal of the Government's shareholding in the company were not at any stage discussed or mentioned by either side, neither was any interest in Greencore shares expressed by ADM at that meeting. My visit to the company was purely in the context of the IDA promotional trip and had no relevance whatsoever to the current position in regard to a possible sale of the Government shareholding in Greencore. I am afraid that suggestions by Deputy Dukes that this was a secret prelude to their share bid is simply untrue.

Indeed, it is only in the last month or so that ADM emerged as a possible purchaser of the residual Government shares in Greencore. I want to state categorically that I had no prior knowledge that ADM were interested in making a bid for the Greencore shares, as I am not privy to the business of the board of Greencore. As the Deputy will appreciate, I am not even a shareholder in the company, except for the special share which I hold to protect the Irish sugar industry.

The Irish sugar industry is of immense importance to the Irish economy, and the special share will ensure that it is adequately protected. I recall that one of the major justifications for restructuring Siúicre Éireann was to enable the development of a major food enterprise based on indigenous resources with a view to maximising added value, exports, and, of course, the creation of jobs, especially in the food area. The sale of the residual Government shares affords a good opportunity for an Irish based company to bid for those shares. It is no secret that I personally would like to see an Irish company make a successful bid for the shares. Indeed, I have stated this publicly on several occasions, even as late as yesterday in Charleville where I was announcing 340 new jobs in the food sector. The Government decided to afford time to all interested parties to put forward proposals for the purchase of the shares, and set a deadline for offers, which should reach the Department of Finance by 24 March 1993 at close of business.

The bids received will be examined, and the Government will make its decision, using criteria which will include price and compatibility and the long term strategic development of Greencore as a major Irish food company which could consolidate and expand employment in the Irish economy.

In conclusion, I must repeat my demand that Deputy Dukes withdraw his baseless allegations. Indeed, a Cheann Chomhairle, I believe that this episode is no more than an abuse of the Adjournment Debate by Deputy Dukes intended to grab cheap media headlines.

Unfortunately for him the allegations are at odds with the facts.

Injured innocence ill behoves the Minister.

Top
Share