Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 27 Apr 1993

Vol. 429 No. 6

Written Answers. - VAT Increase on Building Materials.

Michael Bell

Question:

74 Mr. Bell asked the Minister for Finance the plans, if any, he has to ensure that the 2.5 per cent VAT increase on building materials will not be applied retrospectively prior to the budget; his views on whether it would impose serious financial problems on builders and local authorities where joint ventures had been entered into and projects commenced prior to the budget if it were to be applied retrospectively on buildings under the Urban Renewal Scheme; if he will ensure that it is not applied to building projects which commenced prior to the budget; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

The increase in the rate of VAT applicable to supplies of buildings and building services from 10 per cent to 12.5 per cent applies to all such supplies made after 1 March 1993. There is no provision that would have the effect of applying the increased rate retrospectively to supplies made before that date.

As a general rule, the date on which a contract is entered into is not a factor in determining the date on which a supply is regarded as being made for VAT purposes. A building is deemed to be supplied to the extent that it is paid for or when it is handed over. The date on which a building is deemed to be supplied is determined, therefore, by reference to the date on which any deposits or progress payments are paid, up to the point at which the completed building is handed over. This rule applies not only to buildings but to supplies of goods and services generally. For example, where a building is under construction and part payments are being made, those part payments made before 1 March are liable at the 10 per cent rate, while those made after that date are liable at the 12.5 per cent. Similarly, where a deposit is paid before 1 March and the building is handed over after that date, the deposit is liable at the 10 per cent rate while the balance is liable at the 12.5 per cent rate.

I would point out that I took measures in the budget to ensure that the VAT increase would not impact adversely on housing construction. Accordingly, the Financial Resolution passed by the House on budget night provides, by way of exception to the rules that I have outlined above, that the 10 per cent rate will continue to apply to contracts for houses entered into with private individuals prior to 25 February 1993 regardless of when the actual supply is made. The first time buyer's grant was increased to £3,000 in the budget in order to offset the impact of the VAT increase on contracts entered into after 25 February 1993. Furthermore, I have arranged for appropriate adjustments to be made to the Public Capital Programme so that the local authority new house-building programme and the voluntary housing programme will not be adversely affected by the rate increase.
Where non-house building is concerned, I should point out that VAT registered persons are able to recover the VAT borne on their business inputs including the purchase or development of premises. Thus, the VAT increase should, in most cases, have no more than a short term cash-flow impact.
Overall, I consider that the VAT increase should not give rise to serious financial problems.
Top
Share