Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 18 Nov 1993

Vol. 435 No. 11

Adjournment Debate. - Investment in Science and Technology.

This matter relates to the level of investment in science and technology, particularly in science, and the way in which it can lead to the creation of jobs. If this country is to make progress it must develop its indigenous industries, the agricultural and food industry, the fishing industry and the forestry sector. Most multinational companies are science based, particularly the pharmaceutical and electronic industries, which have a large base in this country. These companies depend very heavily on science and technology for progress. During the 1960s the then British Prime Minister, Mr. Harold Wilson, laid very strong emphasis on the relevance of science and technology as a means of stimulating economic development.

Two types of jobs can be created. First, we can create jobs with a high level of innovation which are heavily dependent on technology. A large number of people, earning good money, can be employed in these jobs and we can get a very worthwhile price on the world market for their products. Second, we can go down the road of a low wage economy, an option to which I would be very much opposed. If we want a highly developed technological economy which produces new goods then it is essential to develop our science and technology.

I am not suggesting that there is a crisis in science as suggested by a body of practising scientists in a report in today's Irish Press although there is no doubt that there are very serious problems in that area. In August 1993, Nature, the world's leading scientific magazine, referred to Ireland as a scientific backwater where the Government had turned its back on science. Ireland is described as a country where science is not championed by the Government and where there is no ministry with special responsibility for science, no research council and no effective lobby to support it. This scientific journal is read in almost every scientific laboratory throughout the world.

Low levels of innovation have been cited as one of the fundamental reasons Ireland is not developing the jobs it badly needs. Ireland has the lowest level of investment in science in the developed world and the level of medical research has been seriously reduced over the past few years, particularly medical research supported by the Health Research Board. The budget for this board in 1992 was reduced to £1.7 million, or 0.09 per cent of the total health budget. Since the abolition of the National Board for Science and Technology approximately a decade ago, scientific agencies have been under siege and bombardment from elements of the establishment whose ignorance has only been matched by the vigour with which they have set about destroying and damaging Irish science. It is disgraceful that elements of the establishment should have set about undermining science, which in turn has undermined our capacity to develop. Much of the progress made in Ireland has been science based. This is particularly true of the dairy industry where progress was underpinned by the research and teaching in UCC and UCD.

It would be unrealistic to think that Ireland could lead the world in the area of science. However, it is essential to make a realistic investment in science and technology which will enable us to be conversant with trade in this area and to avail of ideas developed elsewhere. It is vital to support out small group of elite scientists who, over the past few months, have been distracted from their work, forced to enter the political process and write to newspapers in an effort to highlight their difficulties. I refer in particular to Professor Brian Harvey from UCC who has been writing to the newspapers for the past three or four months and Dr. Garret Fitzgerald, a very distinguished young Irish scientist who has returned to this country from the United States. I understand he employs 36 people in his laboratory while Professor Brian Harvey employs 11 people in his laboratory. Most of the funding received by these scientists comes from outside the country. It is essential that every encouragement is given to these people who provide a great service, generate relationships throughout the international community, attract students from other countries to study here and enable our best and brightest young scientists to study here and eventually become involved in industry. Many of the people whose work underpinned the progress in our dairy and agricultural industry began their working life in the Agricultural Research Institute. The Minister for Social Welfare, Deputy Woods, worked in the Agricultural Research Institute, where he made a contribution to science, before he became involved in politics.

A Cabinet sub-committee should be set up to consider and promote science and technology. A science board should be established — I understand there is some movement in this direction — to review the present position in this area and make recommendations. We will not make any progress in the area of science and technology until a science unit is set up in one of the key Departments — the Department of the Taoiseach, the Department of the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs or the Department of Finance.

The Government fully appreciates the importance of science and technology and the contribution they can make to industrial development and national life generally. Over the past five years the science and technology budget has risen very dramatically from £3.8 million in 1988 to £49.1 million in 1993. Therefore, the comments from some quarters that the Government is not committed to science and technology are without foundation. However, as in any line of endeavour, politicians, no more than industrialists or scientists, are constantly faced with choices and challenges and decisions on how best to apply scarce resources to competing projects.

The Government is fully committed to developing science and technology but it has to maximise the take from its investment for the national good. It has to fully exploit the science base and apply technology in support of innovation and industrial development generally. In the short term the Government is shifting the emphasis from pure science to applied research which will help industry. We are not unique in doing this. The history of science and technology in Europe is of a community which is good at basic research but poor at translating it into competitive advantage, new products and new jobs. The European Commission and the member states recognise this.

The European Union's research and technology development programmes all place emphasis on the applied end of the science and technology spectrum. Indeed President Clinton's policy paper of last February, the recent UK White Paper and various other reviews carried out in member states do likewise. The Culliton report is very precise on this. It states:

Technological competence is one of the main keys to competitive advantage. This is not an optional extra in the search for greater industrial output and employment growth; without adequate technology development in Irish industry a decline in competitiveness is inevitable. Constant improvements in product and process technology are essential to maintain an expanding industrial sector. This applies to all sectors of industry. Even simple low tech products are produced with greater efficiency, quality and precision with improved process technology. Sustainable development of indigenous industry requires entrepreneurs and executives who have a practical knowledge and appreciation of technology and the wish to use it.

Ireland is thus very much in the vanguard of change and of switching emphasis to the application of technology. We want to reduce the remoteness between the third level and industry. We wish to create far greater interaction between technology and industry and we want to make schemes responsive to the needs of industry. The Measure 6 scheme, which we introduced this year and which has a £23 million budget, is purely industry driven; but many of our other schemes are also addressing the needs of industry, large and small, from our technology transfer programmes, to our technology audit programmes for firms, to Tech start, Tech management and to higher education/industry collaboration schemes. Many of these schemes are providing practical help to small indigenous industry and allowing them to take the first steps on the road to technology upgrading.

For industry to be successful it must generate a constant stream of new products and improved processes. It must produce new products to meet customer preferences and it must improve quality and cut costs through efficiency in the production process. As Culliton said, this is not an optional extra. If industry is standing still, it is in effect going backwards.

Science and technology policy to be truly effective must foster a climate in which innovation can develop and spread. Unfortunately, innovation cannot be ordered to measure. It is a complex social process calling for a scientific, technical and business culture as well as a climate that encourages entrepreneurship and long term-vision.

Because it is convinced of the pivotal role which science and technology has to play in modern society, its potential contribution to industrial development, the need for industry to constantly upgrade and innovate and the large amount of State resources already committed to these activities, the Government has agreed to a full scale review of science and technology, details of which will be announced in the near future.

The Government is now embarking on consultations with the European Commission in relation to our proposed National Development Plan 1994-1999. Included within this plan is a special sub programme for research and development which will include measures targeted at funding company-led research and development, assisting companies to evaluate and upgrade their research and development potential, developing, the technology services provided by Eolas, developing regional technology centres offering services to specific industry sectors or in particular technologies, programmes in advanced technologies which develop the expertise of third level institutions in enabling technologies, a fund to support third level research and backup support on evaluation and linkages with other EC programmes for research and technology development.

I appreciate the very detailed comments which the Deputy has made on this topic. His suggestions in relation to the Cabinet subcommittee on science, a possible science board and also a special science unit will be brought to the attention of the Minister in the context of the review of science and technology I mentioned earlier.

Top
Share