I propose to take Questions Nos. 22 and 26 together. If I could be satisfied that imprisoning female offenders was not necessary and that there was an effective alternative available, I would be only too glad to adopt it. The simple fact of the matter is that for some female offenders the courts find it impossible to impose other than a custodial sanction. I do not believe that any amount of study will demonstrate other than that prison, in some cases, is unavoidable.
I am referring here not just to women offenders who commit very serious offences, for example, murder and armed robbery for whom society would expect a custodial sanction, but also a varied core of women offenders for whom alternatives have not worked. These include, for example, serious drug addicts who persist in crime to feed the drug habit or offenders who persist in crime anyway regardless of the leniency already shown to them by the courts.
There is no doubt, of course, that many of the women who end up in prison have been seriously disadvantaged or deprived, abused or exploited. That is why I am determined that the new women's prison will be designed and organised with an ambiance, activities and facilities which will give them maximum help to cope with their disadvantage and every assistance and encouragement to lead them to a more constructive life-style. The first step in this process has been my establishment of an expert Steering Committee to advise me on the best options to take in relation to the design of the women's prison and I look forward to a stage where I can be satisfied that the prison will meet the high standards I am setting.