I have congratulated the Minister for Enterprise and Employment, Deputy Richard Bruton, but I wish to formally do so now by putting it on the record. I wish him well in his new ministerial post and I am sure by now he realises he is responsible for a complex Department. I look forward to future debates here and in committee and I am sure we will have edge and endeavour in our enterprises together.
I raise the matter of the Borland International firm in my national role as Opposition spokesperson on Enterprise and Employment and on behalf of my colleague, Deputy Ray Burke. On 18 January the firm announced a reconstruction of its organisation which by 31 March will amount to a closure of the Dublin facility and the loss of approximately 80 jobs. The firm and its employees have enjoyed an excellent working relationship under the present management of Borland International and in the early 1980s under the management of the Ashton Tate Corporation as it was known previously. The announcement of the anticipated potential closure was made in the light of company restructuring.
As we are nearing the end of January and before more time elapses, will the Minister make direct contact through his office with that firm to see if the decision can be either reversed or mitigated. The potential closure of that firm would be a distinct loss, particularly to an area like Swords, which has serious unemployment problems, as have most areas in Ireland. I emphasise the strong work ethic of the workforce. There has been an excellent working relationship between the previous and present management and workers. The firm is recognised worldwide as having a very good product and it seems that the US decision to restructure its organisation is the dreadful effect that part of it will be the closure of the Swords plant. I was very interested in how the Minister, Deputy Richard Bruton and the Minister of State, Deputy Rabbitte, dealt with the industrial dispute in Packard Electric. Before Christmas I said that the Ministers should intervene in the dispute and take all the measures, which if implemented with rapidity and skill, could be effective. While that proved to be the case it was nearly unsuccessful.
I know the Minister has the enviable back-up of very skilled civil servants in his Department. I pay tribute to their dedication in serving Ministers of the day. Be that as it may, there is a tradition in Kildare Street of non-inter-ventionist action, perhaps one should say "inaction". As I said, there are good skills in the section of the Department that was formerly the Department of Labour. I believe the Department, having regard to the global market, the changing economic climate, demands for market and industrial relationships, realises that there must be intervention.
I was glad to hear the Minister say recently that a special unit will be set up — I expect it will be additional to the competitiveness and employment protection unit which is operating satisfactorily in a modest way — to anticipate potential industrial difficulties and head them off before they arise. The potential closure of this firm does not arise as a result of an industrial difficulty because there is a good working relationship in the firm. In a little over two months a nice tidy compact company in Swords, County Dublin, making a good product, with efficient workers, will close. Even at this stage it should be possible for the Minister to adopt the type of tactics about which I have often spoken. Will he ensure that Borland International is given the necessary encouragement to remain in situ and keep its viable operation open?