Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 25 Apr 1995

Vol. 451 No. 8

Written Answers. - Wildlife Service.

Michael Ferris

Question:

111 Mr. Ferris asked the Minister for Arts, Culture and the Gaeltacht the criteria used by the National Parks and Wildlife Service to assess the game-carrying capacity of lands for which gun days are sought by tourist shoot promoters. [7350/95]

Michael Ferris

Question:

112 Mr. Ferris asked the Minister for Arts, Culture and the Gaeltacht the number of snipe shot in County Mayo in each of the shooting seasons 1990/1991, 1991/1992, 1992/1993 and 1993/1994 based on bag returns submitted by tourist shoot promoters. [7355/95]

Michael Ferris

Question:

113 Mr. Ferris asked the Minister for Arts, Culture and the Gaeltacht if his attention has been drawn to concern stemming from persons with criminal records acting as tourist shoot promoters and/or gillies, some of whom have convictions under the Wildlife Act, 1976, in view of his reply to Parliamentary Question No. 107 of 24 January 1995. [7356/95]

Michael Ferris

Question:

114 Mr. Ferris asked the Minister for Arts, Culture and the Gaeltacht whether he has assessed the gun day carrying capacity of lands for tourist shoot promoters as indicated in his reply to parliamentary questions Nos. 106, 108 and 109 of 24 January 1995. [7357/95]

Michael Ferris

Question:

115 Mr. Ferris asked the Minister for Arts, Culture and the Gaeltacht whether he has satisfied himself that there is sufficient expertise in the Wildlife Service to enable it to assess the game-carrying capacity of lands; and the professional background and training of his assessors in relation to this matter. [7368/95]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 111, 112, 113, 114 and 115 together.

The allocation of gun days to lands submitted for assessment by the National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) is not an exact science and each case is considered on its merits. However, for rough shooting, on a general countrywide basis, lands which include a variety of habitats such as farmland, rivers, ponds, lakes, marshes and bogs, the general gunday allocation would be based on 1,000 acres per 3 guns per fortnight. However, if a considerable amount of commonage is included, the number of guns per 1,000 acres is reduced. The general rule of thumb in relation to forest lettings is approx. 140 acres per gun per fortnight. Lands submitted for assessment in respect of pigeon shooting and driven shoots are assessed individually on the estimated gun capacity of the lands. It is not possible to apply general criteria in these cases.

I recently asked the NPWS to review the question of gunday allocations for 1993-94. I can now confirm that the 7,365 gundays allocated in the 1993/94 season, and referred to in my reply to Parliamentary Questions Nos. 106, 108 and 109 of 24 January 1995, were assessed by the NPWS in accordance with the above criteria. In the cases where maps were not supplied, other information in the form of leases and lists was supplied which enabled assessment to be completed. I have issued strict instructions to the NPWS that no gundays are to be allocated for the 1995-96 season unless adequate maps are supplied.

I am satisfied that NPWS staff have, by virtue of their qualifications, training and experience, the necessary expertise to enable them assess the game carrying capacity of the lands. Management staff involved with assessment have been appointed on the basis of their knowledge of wildlife, including game, and most have 15 years experience or more. During this time they have undergone in-service training and have participated in many surveys of wild birds. Many have third-level qualifications in science-related subjects. In addition, the Research Branch of the NPWS has 3 ornithologists who provide scientific advice on such matters.
Details of the number of snipe shot in County Mayo based on bag returns received from tourist shoot promoters based in the county are as follows:

Season

1992/93

1,172

1993/1994

1,392

1994/1995

Being compiled

Figures for the 1990-91 and 1991-92 seasons are not available as bag returns were not made for the seasons by tourist shoot promoters.
It is important to note that, while these figures are based on returns from operators in County Mayo, these operators may have shooting lands in other counties also. Similarly, operators based in other counties may have shooting lands in County Mayo.
Under the Wildlife Act, I have no specific function in relation to the employment of gillies. However, the Wildlife (Amendment) Bill, which is currently being drafted, will include provision for me, as Minister for Arts, Culture and the Gaeltacht, to make regulations to licence the operations of tourist shoot promoters.
Top
Share