Good Friday, 14 April, saw the end of the national fuel scheme until mid-October. Good Friday was D-day for many thousands of elderly people who depend on additional fuel to keep them warm. The guillotine was brought down on this scheme on Good Friday without any regard to the subzero temperatures during April, particularly at night. I have checked with the meteorological office who informed me it was one of the coldest Aprils for a considerable period.
On making representations to the Minister for Social Welfare, Deputy De Rossa, who has masqueraded as a socialist for many years in this House, he said he had no intention of extending the fuel subsidy scheme. Deputy Kathleen Lynch in The Evening Echo of 19 April 1995 in an article by Helen Coughlan entitled “Elderly Left Out in the Cold” expressed surprise at her party Leader and the Minister for Social Welfare's adamant refusal to extend the scheme. This is more of the hypocrisy from Democratic Left. They say one thing to their constituents and something else behind the closed doors of the Cabinet. They do not have the backbone to stand up for the people they have used for so long in the various statements issued by them both inside and outside the House.
The Minister must recognise and acknowledge that during the cold nights elderly people had to remain beside the fire, the gas stove or whatever form of heating they had. The Minister has shown a callous disregard for these people. In fact the Minister, who was in the House for the vote a few minutes ago, did not think it worth his while to remain here to respond. Instead he left my colleague and good friend to stand in for him.
Individuals, mainly elderly citizens, in receipt of the national fuel allowance have proved to social welfare officers that they are in extremely needy circumstances. If they earn £5 more than their pension entitlement they are not eligible for the scheme. While a welcome increase was granted in the budget the level of income must be extremely low to qualify. The scheme is only £5 per week so it does not cost a great deal.
On top of the battering which these marginalised individuals got in the budget and in the Social Welfare Bill with the record low increase of 2.5 per cent they are now affected by the suspension of this scheme. We are all aware that a bag of coal costs £8.70, that a bale of briquettes costs £1.50. I appeal to the Minister of State at the Department of Social Welfare, Deputy Durkan, who has some heart, rather than the Minister to extend the scheme by one month for the very worthy recipients.
Priority can be given to the appointment of programme managers, special advisers and consultants. We even pass legislation to increase the number of Ministers of State. Yet to the unfortunate people who cannot speak for themselves the Minister says he has no intention of extending the duration of this scheme. I call on the Minister to extend the scheme to 14 May 1995. The needy and the elderly deserve an extension of the scheme. I am aware that I am whistling in the wind. My call, as in the case of the budget and the Social Welfare Bill, will again fall on deaf ears. The priorities of Democratic Left are different from mine.