Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 24 May 1995

Vol. 453 No. 4

Written Answers. - Company Law Review Group Recommendation.

Ned O'Keeffe

Question:

20 Mr. E. O'Keeffe asked the Minister for Finance the new requirements, if any, of the Revenue Commissioners in respect of small companies which will no longer be required to have a statutory audit of their profit and loss accounts and balance sheets; and whether he will require the Revenue Commissioners to accept unaudited accounts without a practising accountant's report, opinion or certificate. [7231/95]

The Revenue Commissioners do not expect to have any special requirements arising from legislation to give effect to the Company Law Review Group recommendation that certain small companies should no longer be required to have a statutory audit of their profit and loss accounts and balance sheets.

The Revenue Commissioners normally insist on the submission by companies of accounts carrying whatever certification from accountants may be required by company law. If new legislation exempts small companies from the requirement to provide a practising accountant's report, opinion or certificate, the Revenue Commissioners will not, of course, insist on such endorsement on accounts submitted by those companies for tax purposes. They will however continue to expect small companies to keep proper books and records as required by tax law so that the annual returns of taxable profits are correct. These returns will of course remain within the scope of Revenue's audit and compliance programmes.

Desmond J. O'Malley

Question:

21 Mr. O'Malley asked the Minister for Finance the reason he has chosen gross current supply service spending as opposed to net current supply services spending as the measure of public spending in the 1995 budget; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [9426/95]

As the Deputy indicates, gross non-capital supply services expenditure was used in the 1995 budget to measure the increase in public spending for the purpose of the Government's commitment to restrict current spending growth to 6 per cent in 1995. Gross current spending was used as it provides a more accurate and realistic measure of what the Government actually spends and is a more appropriate and valid basis on which effective overall control on public expenditure may be exercised.

In the annual Appropriation Act, which is the statutory authority for expenditure on supply services, the Dáil approves, first, the net amount needed for each service and, second, the amount of cash receipts, known as appropriations-in-aid, which may be spent on the service. These two amounts taken together make up the gross amount of each Vote.

A gross measure of public spending is a better measure of total Government spending. Net spending reflects receipts which partially fund spending. These include the receipts of Government Departments by way of charges for services and certain EU transfers. A modest increase in net spending may mask significant increases in overall spending if there are compensating increases in Departmental receipts.

The use of gross supply services spending as a measure of public spending is not a new concept. The annual Book of Estimates has traditionally provided details of departmental expenditure on a gross as well as a net basis. While the amounts voted by the Dáil, and provided for in the Appropriation Act, are net amounts, Government accounting has always been on a gross basis, that is, receipts are not set off against payments. Part II of each Vote sets out the gross provision sought by subhead. The subheads of a Vote are the headings under which the Department is required to account for expenditure and determine the items in the Appropriation Account. This gross approach "facilitates the financial control of the Dáil and enables the Department of Finance to exercise control of expenditure", to quote my Department's outline of Public Financial Procedures, published in 1990.
The recently published 1995 Revised Estimates Volume presents the details of departmental expenditure in precisely the same format as in previous years. This Government has not introduced any new practice but has continued to adhere to long-standing practice in relation to the presentation of the details of Government spending in the Estimates.
Top
Share