Traffic chaos and congestion in my constituency of Dublin South has been steadily worsening during the past ten to 15 years. It is not an exaggeration to say that traffic management is a key political issue and of daily concern to thousands of residents of Dublin South. It is the only reason many citizens in those areas contact their elected representatives.
The quality of life for thousands of Dubliners is eroded on a daily basis by their experience of sitting in cars trying to get to and from work and, indeed, to and from schools. Sadly, in the past we did not have proper planning integrating land use, transportation and road policy. For that reason the people of Dublin South view with joy the announcement of the new tramway system, particularly its extension to Dundrum. However there are various concerns in relation to the proposals that the tramway should not be extended beyond Dundrum.
The combined population of the wider Dundrum area including Goatstown, Upper Kilmacud, Balally, Sandyford, Ballinteer, Marley, Rathfarnham, Churchtown and Dundrum itself must be in the region of 80,000. What numbers are expected to use the new system? I presume the projections have been done by the DTI. It is intended that the widest possible usage of the new tram system will be achieved. How is it intended to accommodate the huge increase in commuters who will descend on Dundrum village in order to avail of the new system? Regular feeder buses from the outlying densely populated areas would be necessary for the viability of LUAS and the avoidance of further traffic chaos in Dundrum.
Much of the wider population of the area has to traverse Dundrum in order to go about its daily business. The traffic problems in the area have increased as each of the above mentioned suburbs has been developed. It regularly takes 15 to 20 minutes to travel 200 yards along the main street of Dundrum. Parking in the village or its environs for those wishing to transact business there is almost impossible as the car park and the shopping centre are extremely congested at all times. No matter what time of the day one observes Dundrum village, the traffic is bad. Where is it proposed to have car parking facilities for commuters who wish to use the new tram route? If they are to be provided in the village, traffic chaos will be exacerbated and trade will be affected.
Will the Minister explain why it is proposed that the tramway will not extend beyond Dundrum? Would it not be economically viable and good use of public money to extend the line to the Stillorgan-Leopardstown industrial estate? If the line is to be cost effective, surely such a demand cannot be ignored. I understand there are 6,000 people working in this successful industrial estate. It would cost an additional £15 million to extend the line to Sandyford industrial estate but it would only cost the taxpayer £1 million. In the context of Dundrum traffic, the extension of the line to the industrial estate would make much more sense and would also mean a greater possibility of providing parking facilities for commuters and for feeder buses. It is imperative that the bypass route for Dundrum, which was the only road the DTI agreed should be built within the outer Dublin ring, should be built at the same time together with the Wyckham bypass, both of which would contribute to traffic calming in the village. If they are not constructed at the same time as the tram link, there is likely to be a reluctance by commuters to attempt to enter Dundrum to take the tram.
Dundrum is struggling to be a vibrant village and it is constantly choked with traffic. I hope there will be good public consultation at all stages of the proposed tram development with elected representatives. There is a democratic deficit in relation to the roads proposal because no questions can be asked in the House about roads which are the responsibility of the National Roads Authority. It is important to keep all the elected representatives and the residents fully informed and consulted regarding the various developments.