Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 7 Feb 1996

Vol. 461 No. 2

Adjournment Debate. - Operation of Sun Tanning Units.

I extend my deepest sympathy to the family of Mr. Seán Kelly on his tragic death following the use of a fast tanning unit. I trust that the debate and discussion that has followed this tragedy will lead to the public being much more informed about the dangers of sunbeds and help save lives. I ask the Minister, having investigated this case, to immediately introduce appropriate legislation to regulate the use of sun beds. In particular I urge him to strictly control the use of what are called "stand up" units which, I understand, use 34 160 watt tubes as compared to the traditional sun beds which use an average of 25 100 watt tubes. We are told that these "stand up" units are brighter, faster and more powerful. What we are not told is that the consumer, in using this equipment with professional advice and assistance, is playing Russian roulette with his or her life. Concerns have been expressed about the level of emissions from the lamps and the quality of lamps. These issues should be dealt with by legislation and regulation.

There is a stark lack of public awareness of the dangers of sun beds. This is evident from the revelations in the media that parents are sending children for tanning sessions before their Holy Communion and Confirmation. If this is true — and we are led to believe it is — I can only describe this practice as no more or no less than reckless behaviour on the part of parents. This practice should be outlawed which is the case in the United Kingdom where persons under 18 years are not allowed to use sun beds.

I also ask the Government to strongly support the Irish Cancer Society's awareness campaign, which will be launched in May this year, on the dangers of exposure to ultraviolet radiation from tanning equipment. It issued guidelines today, and the central message is that too much exposure to ultraviolet radiation can damage one's skin and general health.

In drawing comparisons between the UK and Ireland in relation to the use of sun-tanning equipment it is clear that Ireland has, unfortunately, no proper system of controls to protect the consumer at either national or local level. In the UK the Health and Safety Executive issues specific guidelines for those operating ultraviolet tanning facilities and provides specific information for the customer. At local level there is a special skin treatment licensing system which allows for local authority environmental health inspectors to monitor and inspect the operation of these businesses at local level. The Minister should replicate the UK system of controls by introducing the necessary legislation as a matter of urgency. The local authorities should be involved in licensing premises, and the remit of the Health and Safety Authority could be extended to provide for the safety not just of the workers but also the consumers using this equipment. There is an onus on the industry itself to self-regulate and ensure that all operators of sun-tanning equipment are professionally trained and provide proper medical care and attention for the customer. The British legislation I referred to is the Health and Safety at Work Act, 1974, and the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations, 1992. It is time for us to follow suit.

A young man who lived in my constituency died tragically having used tanning equipment. There is widespread public concern following this sad event. It is incumbent on us as legislators to respond to that legitimate concern and bring a sense of order to the operation and use of this equipment which is urgently required. This should be done without delay.

(Limerick East): I thank Deputy Kitt for raising this matter. The issue has arisen in the context of a specific tragic death, and I would like to be associated with Deputy Kitt's expression of sympathy with the family of Seán Kelly, the individual involved.

However, Deputies must understand that the circumstances of this individual case are being fully investigated at present by the Coroner. He will hold a public inquest in due course and it would not be appropriate for me to draw any conclusion at this time in relation to the unfortunate death or to make any other comment on the specific issue.

As regards the more general issue, however, I fully agree that there is a need to introduce controls on the operation of sun beds. A number of Government Departments have an interest and a possible role in this, such as the Department of Enterprise and Employment which deals with consumer safety, and the Department of Transport, Energy and Communications which deals with radiation.

I have asked the officials in my Department to meet the Departments concerned as soon as possible to discuss how such controls should be implemented. It may be that the regulations can best be made under legislation already in place, such as consumer protection or radiological protection legislation, or it may transpire that a new Act is necessary. In any event, these discussions will take place without delay so that the best approach can be put in place as soon as possible.

Quite apart from the question of statutory controls, it is important that the general public should heed the advice which is issued by the Department of Health and by groups such as the Irish Cancer Society. Sun beds should be used in moderation, and people should seek the advice of their family doctor before doing so for the first time. The use of sun beds is particularly inadvisable for children, people who burn easily, people who do not tan or tan poorly, those taking drugs or using cosmetics thought to be photoactive, those suffering from a skin disorder induced or aggravated by exposure to sunlight, those with a history of skin cancer, and those with risk factors for cutaneous melanoma. The special risks for such groups will obviously have to be taken into account in framing whatever controls are put in place.

Top
Share