Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 11 Dec 1996

Vol. 472 No. 7

Written Answers. - Belarussian Referendum.

Eoin Ryan

Question:

50 Mr. E. Ryan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs the Government's and the EU's response to the splitting of the Belarusian Parliament into two rival Houses, both claiming legitimacy; the Government's and the EU's response to reports that the resounding vote in favour of President Lukashenko during the controversial referendum on Sunday, 24 November 1996, was fraudulent; and the steps, if any, being taken by the EU to ensure that the rule of democracy is protected in Belarus. [23990/96]

The European Union is deeply concerned at developments in Belarus. On 24 November President Lukashenko pressed ahead with a referendum on a new draft constitution which would substantially increase Presidential powers at the expense of both Parliament and the Constitutional Court, despite the clear lack of consultation with Parliament.

According to official figures, there was a turnout of 84 per cent and a vote of 70 per cent in favour of the President's version of a new constitution. However, there is no confidence that the conduct of the referendum was in accordance with democratic practice. There have been a number of reports of serious irregularities and there is considerable concern that the referendum was conducted by an ad hoc electoral commission set up by the President for this purpose, rather than by the standing Central Electoral Commission. The Chairman of the Central Electoral Commission Mr. Gonchar, was ousted from his post by President Lukashenko although he had been appointed by Parliament.

The new constitution was signed by President Lukashenko on 18 November, although the constitutional court had ruled that the referendum should be consultative only. The Constitution has since begun to be implemented with the establishment of a new Lower House of Parliament. The old Parliamentary building has been closed and members have been prevented from returning to it. A number of deputies of the old Parliamentary Assembly continue to voice their opposition to these developments. The president of the constitutional court and two other members have resigned, and there have been further public protests in Belarus.

The situation in Belarus has been of concern to the Union for some time. On 24 October the European Parliament decided that no further steps would be taken towards ratification of the partnership and co-operation agreement between the European Union and Belarus or towards further implementation of the interim agreement, until clear signals had been given by the Belarus authorities of their intention to respect fully basic democratic and human rights.

The Union's concerns have been conveyed to the Belarussian authorities on several occasions — by Troika demarche in Minsk on 14 October, in a Council Declaration on 18 October, by personal letter of 21 November from the President of the Council and in an EU Troika meeting with President Lukashenko at the OSCE Summit in Lisbon, led by the Taoiseach, as President of the European Council.

At that meeting, the Taoiseach conveyed to President Lukashenko a strong message from the Union regarding the constitutionality of the recent referendum in Belarus and the changes based upon it. The Troika's detailed criticism were rejected by President Lukashenko, who maintained that the international community was misinformed about the situation in Belarus. The Troika proposed that a fact-finding mission should visit Belarus. This proposal was further confirmed by the General Affairs Council on 6 December and a letter is being sent to President Lukashenko in this regard.
However, it has continually been stressed to President Lukashenko that the European Union strongly desires a close and co-operative relationship with Belarus and is anxious that Belarus continue along the path of economic and democratic reform. The Union's readiness to provide all practical assistance to Belarus in implementing political and economic reform, has been made clear, but it has also been emphasised that it is essential for Belarus to demonstrate its own commitment to democratic principles and parliamentary democracy.
The situation in Belarus continues to remain under close consideration by the Union including the question of further appropriate Union action.
Top
Share