Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 30 Apr 1997

Vol. 478 No. 5

Other Questions. - Human Rights Committee.

Séamus Hughes

Question:

10 Mr. Hughes asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs the circumstances under which the Government has failed to establish a Standing NGO Committee on Human Rights as a permanent interdepartmental mechanism to coordinate the approach to human rights between ministries and as a formal structure to facilitate a regular exchange of views and information between the Government and non-governmental organisations, as promised in the Government's White Paper on Foreign Affairs. [11477/97]

The White Paper on Foreign Policy, "Challenges and Opportunities Abroad", made clear that the Government regarded human rights as a central part of Ireland's foreign policy. Chapter 8 of the White Paper signalled a number of initiatives being taken by the Government in the human rights area, including the establishment of a human rights unit in my Department for the first time.

A number of important other initiatives were also outlined in Chapter 8 of the White Paper. First, recognising that greater co-ordination was needed between Government Departments on human rights issues, it indicated that a new standing interdepartmental committee was being established to consider all aspects of Ireland's international human rights obligations. Second, the White Paper acknowledged the increasing role and importance of non-governmental organisations in the formulation of Ireland's foreign policy. Accordingly, it indicated the level of contact between the Department and NGOs on the human rights aspects of foreign policy had become so intensive that it had been decided to establish a formal framework for a regular exchange of views between the Department and representatives of the NGO community and a new joint standing committee representing the Department, NGOs and experts in the human rights field was, therefore, being established.

Following completion of the Presidency of the EU, which was particularly active in the human rights area, preparations for the establishment of these two committees were intensified. The Standing Interdepartmental Committee on Human Rights, which had its first meeting on 18 February last, has already begun implementation of a full programme of work. I am certain it will contribute significantly to improving interdepartmental co-ordination on human rights issues.

Work on establishing the standing committee involving NGOs and human rights experts has almost been completed. Detailed research has been undertaken on how other countries approach this issue in order to determine the model most suited to the Irish situation. Informal consultations on the matter have taken place with a number of NGOs. I attach considerable importance to this committee and this is reflected in the level of preparation which is being made for its establishment. It is intended that this committee will be instituted very shortly. I look forward to the vital contribution which it can make to the formulation of the human rights aspects of Ireland's foreign policy. I am confident that its work will enhance considerably the role Ireland can play internationally in this critical area.

Will the Minister outline the extent of the communication between the Government and NGOs on foreign policy formulation and evaluation, the circumstances under-which he has seen fit to put a stop to the alleged monthly meetings with Dochas in the wake of the Irish EU Presidency and whether the Government is of the opinion that regular and structured communications with the NGOs is beneficial only when Ireland holds the EU Presidency? It is a matter of regret that it is only during the dying days of the Government and at the end of his period in the Department of Foreign Affairs that the Minister has set about establishing this formalised framework with the NGOs. This should have been done by the Minister at the outset, not when he is about to leave Iveagh House.

I am probably one-third of the way through my period in Iveagh House so I take what the Deputy said with a grain of salt.

(Wexford): Wishful thinking.

(Interruptions.)

Is the Minister going to take up a job as an usher?

An Leas-Cheann Comhairle

Let us hear the Minister's reply.

I set about ensuring a good working relationship with the NGOs. If the Deputy, as Opposition spokesperson on Foreign Affairs, has discussions with the NGOs he will find they have a level of access to the Department of Foreign Affairs which they did not have in the past. The Minister of State and I set out to meet the NGOs on a regular basis. Representatives of NGOs are with us at international conferences because we value their work and contribution to the evolution of foreign policy from the Government's point of view. A human rights unit has been set up in my Department. Fianna Fáil has been primarily in the control of the Department of Foreign Affairs since the foundation of the State and I do not think it crossed its mind to set up such a unit. We felt it was necessary to establish such a unit because of the increased workload in that area and the importance we place on foreign policy for the country.

Will the Minister answer my question?

We shall continue with this work. Dóchas had access to the Department on a regular basis during the Irish Presidency of the EU and will continue to have access to it over the next five years.

It will have plenty of access over the next five years to the Fianna Fáil personnel in Iveagh House.

Will the Deputy put an even twenty on that?

An Leas-Cheann Comhairle

That concludes questions for today.

Written Answers follow Adjournment Debate.

Top
Share