I thank the Chair for selecting this item. I congratulate the Minister, Deputy Micheál Martin, on his appointment as Minister for Education. It is an onerous responsibility. He worked very hard as spokesman on Education when he was in Opposition. I wish him every success over the next few years in a key area of Government policy.
I am glad to have the opportunity to discuss the issue of pre-school education with the Minister. Ireland lags far behind our EU partners in the provision of State funded pre-school education, but it would be remiss of me if I failed to recognise the sterling work of the former Minister for Education, former Deputy Niamh Bhreathnach, who pioneered the initial response by establishing a pilot programme in this area and set the foundation for the emergence of a well funded pre-school education system.
We are only beginning to learn about the first response to the pilot programme, but unless the present Minister for Education prioritises the issue and fights for additional funding for this area within his Department, the entire advance of pre-school education will be stopped in its tracks. The advance of pre-school education, particularly in some of the most deprived areas, can only succeed if the Minister for Education wins the argument in financial terms at the Cabinet table. The success of the early start pilot programme and of the breaking the cycle of educational disadvantage programme can only be realised if there is a financial commitment by the Taoiseach, the Tánaiste and all Ministers in the Government.
The Minister should prioritise this area of education policy because if the work that was pioneered by the last Government continues over the next few years we can make a real dent in the issue of educational disadvantage. This, in conjunction with the programme breaking the cycle of educational disadvantage and the school attendance legislation promised by the Minister would do more to help disadvantaged children than anything the Minister could do over the next few of years. Extending the early school programme, increasing the number of teachers in disadvantaged schools and putting in place a well resourced system of school attendance officers would make a vital difference to parents, teachers and children in gravely disadvantaged communities.
My advice to the Minister is to concentrate resources on the basis of educational need, namely the children at primary school level in disadvantaged areas. The extension of the early school programme could have a dramatic effect on the lives of parents who sometimes have to cope with insurmountable odds. In communities where attendance at school can be as low as 60 per cent of the eligible school-going population, it is vital that the culture of school as a vehicle for life chances and life opportunities be part of a child's development from the earliest time.
The pre-school system is also of crucial importance to parents. Young parents in particular need the space and time it can provide for their children. It is as much a resource for them as their children. By making pre-school education central to a community with huge social problems we will lessen the chances of children displaying signs of dysfunctional behaviour in school at a later stage.
I appeal to the Minister to consider the application of St. Brigid's national school in Brookfield in my constituency for inclusion in the next phase of the early start programme. The school is situated in a parish where the rate of unemployment stands at 82 per cent, which consists entirely of local authority housing and where lone parents account for 38 per cent of the population.
The school was informed by the Department that it failed to meet two of the main criteria for inclusion in the 1996-7 pilot programme. It was informed that there was no great need to provide a pre-school option in the area and that two rooms would have to be made available. Any assessment of social conditions in the area would lead one to the conclusion there is not alone a need for such a facility but that it is necessary. There are also two rooms available. The school management cannot understand how the Department has failed to recognise this.
An imaginative response is required from Government. The school should be included in the next phase of the programme as a matter of priority.