Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 16 Dec 1997

Vol. 485 No. 2

Adjournment Debate. - Protection of Wildlife Habitats.

While I am around, the birds and the bees need not feel unprotected. I am sorry to say there are not many others like me in this House. I often wonder what the Green Party stands for.

I am amazed to read in the newspapers that Ireland is being sued by the European Union for not protecting wildlife habitats. I want the Minister to respond to the European Union's case. Apparently we are allowing the habitats of not just rare species but a whole series of wildlife species to be destroyed and the Government does not seem to be taking any corrective action. Will the Minister outline the action she intends to take?

Other western European countries which have adequate resources available to them — as Ireland should, particularly in these years — conduct a wildlife census. They know exactly the number of each species — blackbird, goldfinch, plover or whatever — in existence and how many are in danger. Ireland has no such system to identify which species is extinct, which is almost extinct and which needs protection. I am asking the Minister to set up a network to evaluate the species which are endangered and in need of protection. Armed with this information, she should protect those species. The British carry out an annual census of endangered species. They know the situation but here it is a case of hit and miss.

The classic example is the corncrake which is an endangered species. The number of corncrakes has been dropping year after year. I know that sanctuaries are being set up in the River Shannon basin and that it still exists in north County Donegal. I have heard it. However, the other day I heard a famous student of wildlife, who was being interviewed on radio, say that the number of corncrakes in north County Donegal has seriously declined in the past few years. That type of news is alarming.

The report in The Sunday Times which refers to the European Union's action against the Government states that species, such as the red grouse which we would have thought were common are endangered at present primarily due to over grazing by sheep. Heather is their natural food and it is the habitat which protects them from detection. It is being eaten away. Overgrazing is a serious problem. I have stated before that sheep farmers, particularly hill farmers, should be compensated for leaving a certain proportion of mountain and bogland areas on which wildlife could thrive. I know it will cost money but it is what the European Union and everyone who is interested in wildlife want.

It is not just the red grouse which is endangered. The merlin, the golden plover, and the hen harrier, all of which are beautiful species, are seriously endangered as, I am sure, are a series of others.

I am not blaming the Minister specifically because I have raised the matter with previous Ministers. The current Minister was here at the time and heard me. There has been no action.

There is an insufficient number of wildlife rangers. There is one in my county, which has two very large mountain ranges, moorland, hills and river basins. That is totally inadequate. I appeal to the Minister to be the first to do something definite about the matter to ensure our wildlife is not allowed become extinct, that we are not left with predators and scavengers, and that all the song birds and the lovelier parts of our heritage are retained.

I compliment people such as Mr. Dick Warner and Mr. Derek Mooney for the wonderful wildlife programmes which they are producing on radio——

"Mooney goes wild on One".

At least it wakes us up to the reality of what is happening. Two weeks ago we waited ten minutes to hear a leaf falling from an ash tree but it was a wonderful study in nature. We need people who are interested in wildlife but politicians do not seem to be interested, not even those in the Green Party. They have far more serious matters to attend to.

I appeal to the Minister to do something about this matter.

I thank Deputy Deasy for raising this matter. He is correct in stating that he made these arguments when he was on this side of the House. He has again made a genuine and impassioned plea on behalf of wildlife.

Deputy Deasy will be aware that the Wildlife (Amendment) Bill has been promised for some time but, unfortunately, it did not materialise during the term of office of the previous Government. However, I have had a number of meetings with those interested in this Bill not least the NGOs who raised a number of issues with me last week. The plight of the corncrake was one of the issues raised and the representatives of the NGOs involved stated that it was the first opportunity they had to talk directly to the Minister responsible for introducing the legislation. I informed them that I intend to publish the Bill in March.

The country's most important wildlife areas are required to be designated either as special protection areas — SPAs — under the 1979 EU Birds Directive or as special areas of conservation — SACs — under the 1992 EU Habitats Directive. Over 100 SPAs have already been designated in Ireland and the process of designating SACs is under way in that the main part of what will be Ireland's SAC network — over 200 sites amounting to 550,000 hectares — has already been publicly proposed for designation and is accordingly protected.

With regard to SPAs, designation does not normally imply a restriction on existing activities. Landowners are asked to consult with the National Parks and Wildlife Service of my Department before undertaking any new projects or activities in or near designated SPA sites which may adversely affect them. Each planning authority is sent details of SPAs within its functional area and is asked to take account of the designation when examining development proposals.

Land in SACs is required to be farmed in accordance with an approved agri-environmental plan which will specify, inter alia, the stocking restrictions, if any, required to conserve the land in question. Those participating in the REPS schemes, administered by the Department of Agriculture and Food, will have a farm plan prepared as part of that scheme. Those who do not wish to join REPS may operate in accordance with a plan prepared by the National Parks and Wildlife Service of my Department. Each individual farm plan impinging on commonage land will have to be compatible with an overall plan for the commonage prepared by my Department in consultation with the Department of Agriculture and Food. This plan will specify the maximum overall stocking density that the area can carry on a sustainable basis.

The Deputy will be aware that Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — the Habitats Directive — was transposed into Irish law on 26 February 1997 by means of the European Communities (Natural Habitats) Regulations, 1997. These regulations fully transpose the Habitats Directive into Irish law and they contain significant additional provisions relating, inter alia, to compensation, notification of proposed candidate sites to landowners and objections to proposed designations — on scientific grounds only — and appeals against restriction.

As I informed the Deputy in a reply to a Parliamentary Question on 27 November last, the EU has been notified of our proposals in respect of SAC designations subject to the outcome of the requisite consultation process. A number of sites proposed as part of that consultation process are the subject of appeals and I will not formally notify the EU Commission of those sites until appeals have been resolved. I hope this can be achieved by next April. The possibility of whether sites on which there have been appeals can be notified at an earlier date is under consideration at present.

I hope to be in a position to publish proposals relating to non-priority habitats by mid-1998 and these will be notified to the Commission when any objections or appeals have been resolved. I hope the final element of Ireland's SAC network, comprising marine and coastal sites, will be publicly advertised before the end of 1998.

The Deputy will appreciate that the habitats regulations go further than required by the Habitats Directive in the immediate imposition of controls on sites from the time for their identification as provisional candidate SACs. Since taking office I have had meetings with the IFA and the ICMSA in respect of SACs and other natural heritage issues. Last week I met six other conservation bodies to further progress the level of partnership on this issue.

I agree with the fundamental objectives of the EU Birds and Habitats Directives and I believe our most important natural areas and species should be protected. In that context, I am committed to implementing the directives' provisions. I also believe that those who suffer loss because of conservation restrictions are entitled to fair compensation.

The Deputy will be aware that to date a large number of meetings have been held with relevant groups, representing landowners, land users and other interests, to explain the SAC/SPA process. These have proved to be beneficial and similar meetings continue to be held. However, while in Opposition, I was conscious that, notwithstanding the meetings and briefings taking place, the message was still not getting through and that events which would profoundly influence the lives of many people were felt to be taking place in a world removed from theirs.

I am currently assessing all aspects of the implementation process in line with the commitment made in the Programme for Government, "An Action Plan for the Millennium", in order to ensure the full involvement of all participants in a spirit of real partnership. I would welcome any specific proposals Deputy Deasy would like to put forward in respect of the SACs or the Wildlife (Amendment) Bill. I look forward to hearing from him.

What about a census of wildlife? That is a real priority and a necessity.

I look forward to discussing that issue further with the Deputy. The people to whom Deputy Deasy referred have done a particular service for wildlife.

Top
Share