Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 21 Oct 1998

Vol. 495 No. 5

Adjournment Debate. - National Housing Commission.

In the absence of the Minister for the Environment and Local Government, I hoped the Minister for Finance would remain in the House to hear my case for a housing commission. However, I welcome the Minister of State.

I was deeply concerned by the response I received during Environment questions from the Minister of State with responsibility for housing, Deputy Molloy. He refused to accept that there was a housing crisis, despite the growing evidence clear to every Member. There is the empirical data of 40,000 families and individuals on local authority housing waiting lists at the last count. It is clear that buying a house is beyond the reach of even double income young couples. More and more of these people are turning to local authorities to address social housing needs.

The attitude of the Minister of State and the Government to this crisis is complacent. There is daily evidence of extraordinary practices in the housing market. This was underscored today when Annette and Stephen Butler were forced to go to court to seek to retain a house whose price had risen by an amazing £20,000, putting it well beyond their reach. They were gazumped. Unfortunately, the Government rejected a Fine Gael proposal to deal with this issue without proposing any other measure to deal with the problem which is affecting individuals and couples daily.

There is a crisis in the supply of houses. There is also a new crisis in the rental sector. The impact of the measures implemented on foot of the Bacon report have put pressure on the rental sector. People are being forced to look for rent subsidies. An extraordinary amount of money is being paid out as we try to deal with a scarce resource being sought by an ever-increasing number of people.

In last Saturday's The Irish Times, Dr. Murphy, one of the authors of the Bacon report, stated:

The Government is being amazingly silent on the long-term issues raised in this report. It has not given any convincing or credible reason for not implementing policy quickly. In fact, we do not know what is going on at all.

That is the response of people charged with mapping out a course of action for the Government on housing. The Government and the Minister of State must acknowledge that a housing crisis exists. The Government must establish the housing commission which I and many voluntary housing groups working at the front edge of housing provision are calling for. It must also bring together all interested parties to address the various issues in social housing, not just the supply side.

The Government should instruct local authorities to establish social housing land banks and provide funding for them to do so. It must also require each authority to develop a social housing plan. The Government should provide immediate funding for the provision of infrastructure such as sewage, water and roads into these social housing land banks.

The £15 million provided to augment the sums to date is totally inadequate and will go nowhere to address the scale of the housing crisis. This is one of the main social problems which the Government must address. I hope the Minister of State will provide a concrete response to these issues.

I am glad the Deputy has raised this matter. My colleague the Minister of State with responsibility for housing and urban renewal, Deputy Molloy, is unable to be in the House this evening to respond to this item and has asked me to do so on his behalf.

I wish to deal with the issue of the housing crisis. Deputy Howlin and others have been calling for the declaration of a housing crisis or a housing emergency. Deputy Molloy is not the first Minister to be called on to act in such a manner and he will not be the last. What would the declaration of a housing crisis achieve? The Deputy knows that it would do little or nothing in terms of a response to developments in the housing market or an increase in the supply of housing to meet needs. In our current circumstances, with positive indicators on house prices emerging, a declaration of that sort could contribute to reintroducing some of the excessive and panic-driven behaviour which was becoming a feature of the market before this Government took action.

As regards the proposal for the establishment of a national housing commission, the Minister of State is open to useful suggestions and ideas from any source which will help to meet housing needs.

Is that a yes or a no?

Deputy Molloy previously informed the Deputy and the House that he has met with representatives of the five voluntary bodies who originally made this proposal. It is also noted that the recently re-appointed National Economic and Social Council will consider a proposal for a study on housing at an early meeting. Very considerable preparatory work has already been done by the secretariat. I have little doubt that the council will be anxious to tackle housing issues. Accordingly, the Government, unions, employers, farmers and the voluntary sector will be debating and contributing to the development of housing strategies. It is expected that the output of NESC's work, likely to be completed early in the New Year, will be an important input to future housing policy.

Well thought out and effective action has been taken by this Government in relation to housing under our Action on House Prices package.

The Minister of State has heard what the author has said.

The Deputy should not quote the author out of context. Housing is one of the Government's top priotities. However, there is no instant solution to the basic lack of equilibrium between housing demand and supply which underlies our current problems.

I am proud of the Government's progress in addressing this matter and am delighted we will shortly see progress on the ground under the serviced land initiative. Up to 30 of the schemes approved under the first tranche of funding will be under way before the end of the year. In total, this initiative will result in 100,000 sites becoming available for housing. This is hardly Government inaction, as the Deputy might have us believe.

I remind Deputies of the Government's commitment to meeting social housing needs. An Action Programme for the Millennium specifically pledges us to a continuing house construction programme by local authorities and voluntary groups, and to the improvement and extension of social housing schemes generally. On foot of these pledges, we provided substantially increased resources of £367 million to social housing in 1998, an increase of 28 per cent on 1997. Up to 10,000 households will be accommodated by the various social housing measures this year, compared with less than 9,300 households in 1997.

These are the same figures we have been hearing for five years.

If the figure is up 28 per cent, how can it be the same as the last five years? Deputies can be assured that the Minister of State is seeking further increases in resources for social housing in the coming year.

We all have a responsibility to be reasonable, balanced, practical and positive in our attitude to this. We must ensure in this marketled economy the Government, in the responsible attitude it adopts, is catering for those who are unable to compete in that market. That will continue to be the strength of the social attitude this Government adopts in office.

Complacency.

It is a sham.

Top
Share