Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 24 Nov 1998

Vol. 497 No. 2

Written Answers - Family Maintenance Liabilities.

Jim O'Keeffe

Question:

35 Mr. J. O'Keeffe asked the Minister for Social, Community and Family Affairs his views on whether the system under which liabilities imposed on the spouses of certain social welfare recipients, including recipients of deserted wife's benefit, to make contributions to his Department towards payments of this benefit can lead to considerable injustice; his further views on whether, in the computation of this liability, his Department is precluded under administrative guidelines from allowing many expenses; the proposals, if any, he has to change the system along the lines being suggested in the United Kingdom; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24471/98]

The liability to maintain provisions in social welfare legislation impose a general obligation on spouses to maintain each other and their children, and on parents to maintain their children. In the event of separation or unmarried parenthood, the provisions require spouses or parents, known as "liable relatives" to make regular contributions towards the cost of providing social welfare income support for their families. The rationale underlying these provisions is that, if lone parent families require support through a social welfare payment because of inadequate maintenance, then the State is entitled to recover an appropriate amount from the liable relatives concerned.

In general, I am satisfied that the system operates in a fair manner and strikes a reasonable balance between the income position of the liable relative and their obligations to contribute towards the maintenance of their former spouses and children. The assessment is based on the income of the liable relative net of taxes and other statutory deductions and in determining the amount to be contributed, allowances are made for living expenses, mortage or rent, any maintenance orders being honoured already, and for any dependent children living with the liable relative. Furthermore, there is an over-riding limitation on the amount of contribution to be paid to the Department by a liable relative. This method is intended to realistically assess the ability of liable relatives to contribute, while maintaining the social welfare income position of the one-parent family.

I do not propose to make any fundamental change to the way the liable relative contributions are assessed, but I am considering the question of formalising the current administrative arrangements by regulations, including the introduction of an appeals procedure, through the independent Social Walfare Appeals Office, for determination in this area. I also intend to provide for the pursuit of liable relatives who default on their contribution obligations, by court proceedings if necessary.
Regarding liability systems in other countries, including the United Kingdom, the Deputy will appreciate that it is difficult to make comparisons because of the different legal and social security systems in the various countries, and because of differing social norms and trends. In this country the relevant provisions are being implemented in the context of Irish family law and of the particular forms of social welfare support for separated and unmarried one-parent families applicable here. Nonetheless, I intend to keep the provisions under review and to take note in this connection of the implications for the Irish system of research on the arrangements which apply elsewhere.
Top
Share