I propose to take Questions Nos. 238 and 239 together.
Tables setting out the numbers serving in the relevant grades, by Department, are attached at appendices 1-3. The criteria for the appointment to these higher level grades is as follows:–
Principal (higher) and Assistant Principal (higher)
The principal (higher) and assistant principal (higher) grades are separate grades from the standard grades of the same name. Posts are graded at the higher levels where management deems that the scope and quality of the duties and responsibilities involved are greater than applies in the case of the standard grades.
Appointment to the higher grades is by way of promotion either within the Departments which have these grades or from an inter-departmental competition. Promotion is on the basis of the best qualified candidate from among those eligible.
Assistant principals (standard), administrative officers (standard and higher scale) and higher executive officers (standard and higher scale) are eligible for promotion to assistant principal (higher). Administrative officers and higher executive officers are required to have four years service to be eligible for such promotion. Principals (standard) and assistant principals (standard and higher) and, in the case of inter-departmental competitions, certain other comparable grades, may be eligible for promotion to principal (higher).
Higher Executive Officer
Under the PCW restructuring agreement for grades represented by the Public Service Executive Union, a new higher scale applies to 30 per cent of the higher executive officers in each Department. The criteria for assignment to the higher scale is determined by the Head of each Department following consultation with local staff interests. The officers concerned must be satisfactory from the point of view of the performance of the duties of the grade, general conduct and sick leave. The requirements of a scheme of appraisal-performance review must be met where such a scheme is in operation. Of the initial assignments to the higher scale following the restructuring agreement in 1995, 50 per cent were on the basis of seniority subject to satisfactory performance and the remainder on the basis already outlined.