Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 30 Mar 1999

Vol. 502 No. 6

Written Answers. - UN Security Council.

Seán Barrett

Question:

32 Mr. Barrett asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the progress, if any, made in Ireland's campaign for a seat on the UN Security Council. [8863/99]

Pat Rabbitte

Question:

58 Mr. Rabbitte asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the response, if any, Ireland has received for its objective of winning a seat on the Security Council of the United Nations; if the Government intends to promote reforms of the United Nations, particularly in regard to the composition of the Security Council; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8924/99]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 32 and 58 together.

Ireland is seeking election to one of the two non-permanent seats on the United Nations Security Council which are designated for the Western Europe and Others Group of States for the two-year term 2001-2002. The election will take place in the 185-member UN General Assembly in the autumn of 2000, probably in October. The election is being contested by three other candidates, Norway and Turkey, and since 5 March, Italy. Successful candidates will require the support of two-thirds of those states present and voting. In effect, this means that the support of around 120 states will be needed to secure election. The election is by secret ballot.
As Minister for Foreign Affairs, I have sought support for Ireland's candidacy on all appropriate occasions, including on official visits abroad. Since September last, I have personally discussed Ireland's candidacy with representatives of over 40 United Nations' member states.
In September, before the campaign entered a more intense phase, we had around 30 commitments. This level of support has been built on and I am determined that by September-October 2000 when the election takes place we will have the necessary number of votes to secure election. As I have indicated previously, as this is a contested election, I am reluctant to indicate the exact level of support committed to Ireland at this stage.
As regards UN reform, in line with the commitment in An Action Programme for the Millennium, Ireland has actively supported efforts to modernise and reform the UN system so that it can be more effective in responding to the complex and difficult challenges in the coming millennium. Our priority is to secure agreement on the measures necessary to revitalise the United Nations and to ensure more vigorous action in fulfilling its mandate under the UN Charter of maintaining international peace and security and promoting the economic and social development of all member states. With our EU partners, we have given strong support to measures aimed at securing a better co-ordinated and more streamlined UN, which makes more effective use of personnel and financial resources, and at improving the setting of priorities for action by the UN.
Ireland takes an active role in ongoing discussions in New York on Security Council reform and, as a member of an informal group of ten small and medium-sized states, has played a significant bridge-building role in the debate. Ireland supports a reform of the composition of the Security Council which would make it more representative of the general membership of the UN. We favour a small increase in permanent members, from its present number of five, selected on the basis of global influence and contribution to the work of the UN as well as considerations of equitable geographical distribution. We also favour a small increase in the number of non-permanent members of around five, with these new seats being allocated to the various regional groups. In addition to the enlargement issue, Ireland favours improved and more transparent working methods of the Council involving more frequent consultation between it and the General Assembly, the Secretary-General and other major organs of the UN system. We also see a need for more restrictive use of the veto power of the permanent members of the Security Council and we believe that the veto power should not be extended to any new permanent members.
Top
Share