As I have made apparent in my contributions during the debates in the Houses of the Oireachtas on the passage of the Bretton Woods (Agreements) (Amendment) Act, 1999, the HIPCs debt initiative is a major step forward, but needs to be substantially improved.
I believe that debt relief should be closely linked to the goals of sustainable development and poverty reduction, and that there is a broad consensus growing up at European Union level now in favour of this position. It is clear to me that the underlying programmes for HIPC should focus on high quality growth aiming at improving the situation of the poor and reflect social concerns by protecting social expenditures. In this context, notwithstanding the remarkable achievements so far and the large degree of flexibility applied, the HIPC initiative has been criticised, in particular by NGO'S, as providing too little debt relief too late. In response, several EU member states, including Ireland, have made proposals for changes in the HIPC debt initiative for debt relief to be deeper, to cover more countries and to be provided earlier. These proposals focus on the following areas; the timing of debt relief; the definition of indicators for sustainability; the extent of Paris Club debt cancellation on commercial debt; the extent of ODA debt cancellation the need for an appropriate financing and burden sharing.
These proposals, of course, have important implications for the financing of the HIPC initiative, in particular since even in its current framework the initiative is not fully financed.
The precise modalities for contributions by the various international institutions are set out on the internet websites of the World Bank and IMF. Their availability reflects a new climate of openness and transparency on the part of both of these institutions. The relevant Internet addresses are: