Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 22 Jun 1999

Vol. 506 No. 5

Adjournment Debate. - Community Employment Schemes.

I welcome the opportunity to raise this important issue. Some of us do not realise that community employment schemes make a significant contribution to the development of community life, particularly in areas which have been designated as disadvantaged, such as those which qualify for partnership companies. I am mainly, though not exclusively, concerned with Dublin 12.

The majority of community employment schemes, however, were capped, with the exception of those which got the opportunity to have "rate for the job". Some groups which applied for the rate for the job were told that the quota had been used up and they could not, therefore, apply for it. Those over 35 years of age cannot take up part-time job options under these new regulations because they are not allowed a third year. If 28 participants in Dublin 12 were over 35, they would have been normally entitled to second and third years. Now only 10 per cent are entitled to that – only 2.8 people could be retained as opposed to 28 in the past.

In the Dublin 12 area the number of previous participants over 35 allowed to participate in the community employment scheme was 587. That has now been capped at 484, a reduction of 103. That area is not large but the schools in it which benefit from the assistance of the community employment schemes and all the other projects will suffer if this is allowed to go ahead.

The FÁS community employment supervisors network in Dublin 12 is very disturbed by the changes taking place in community employment. The scheme was set in 1993 to get short and long-term unemployed into the workforce. Supervisors were trained accordingly. They were told how important it is to treat the participants with dignity, to build up their self-confidence and improve the quality of their lives, something they have done. I have seen the transformation in people participating in these schemes. Now that the economy is successful, they have been cast aside and we are only dealing with numbers.

I have been asked to raise eight points by those involved. All their projects, except for those accepted for rate for the job, have been capped. I say those accepted because a number of projects were turned down for this option because the local FÁS office had reached its quota. The supervisors were led to believe at a meeting with FÁS personnel that they would be going for rate for the job. In anticipation they had recruited over 35 long-term unemployed. Now all that has changed and they have to let their over 35s go after one year.

This group is working in a disadvantaged area, doing very valuable work such as caring for the elderly and those with disabilities and running crèches and playschools. They have been told they will be judged on progress. Many of the participants are lone parents who have never worked outside the home. Because the participants are socially disadvantaged, one or two years is not enough time to prepare them to take up the jobs which had been created.

There have been various reports such as those by Deloitte & Touche and Conference of Religious of Ireland, but nobody consulted with those on the job. The participants were led to believe that the posts will be cut further next year. These rumours have caused alarm. They also have been led to believe that other disadvantaged areas have been unaffected by these changes. Why is that? Some participants have difficulty in reading and writing, with the resultant fear of training.

The Exchequer has been given £590,000 in tax and PRSI by these people. They are making a financial as well as a social contribution. We must not deal with this matter like a bull in a china shop. We must take into account the contribution they are making. I hope the Minister will take these concerns into account and act accordingly.

The primary purpose of the community employment programme is as a transitional programme to reintegrate long-term unemployed persons into open labour market jobs. This year there has been a reduction in the number of places in community employment, from a level approaching 40,000 at end 1998 to an average of 37,500 in 1999. This reduction of 6 per cent reflects in a very modest way the drop in unemployment levels, which are down 65,000 year on year to November 1998. It is also indicative of a strategic shift in supports for unemployed persons away from community employment towards mainstream training programmes, bridging programmes to mainstream training and job clubs. An additional 10,000 places in these areas were provided for in the 1999 Revised Estimates.

This strategy represents a response to the thrust of the Deloitte & Touche review of community employment. The main elements of that review were to reduce the number of places; improve targeting and progression; limit rollover by participants; have young adults participate in mainstream training rather than community employment; and discontinue community employment within the State sector.

The Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment has just completed a round of consultations with the social partners on the restructuring of community employment. Taking these discussions into account, proposals for the restructuring of community employment are currently being finalised. As is standard practice, these proposals will be circulated to relevant Departments for observation prior to being brought to Government. It is anticipated that the restructuring proposals will be implemented on a phased basis over a number of years.

Within the context of the overall number of places on community employment schemes, FÁS has operational responsibility for project selection and appraisal. Priority is accorded to sponsors who provide good and relevant work experience, training and educational experiences, achieved good progression, including placement results, and have an approved and effective supervisor.

In addition, a strategic policy focus is applied to projects, having regard to national and local policy objectives. This means that child care and drugs task force projects, for example, are accorded priority. There is also an emphasis on projects which accord with partnership-community employment framework agreement priorities and with local development plans.

It is important to stress that a number of community employment projects have a finite lifetime as opposed to those schemes providing services which are rolled over, and this too will be a criterion applied in any reduction in numbers.

While the restructuring proposals on community employment, which the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment intends to bring forward, will reflect a number of issues in the Deloitte & Touche review, the full set of recommendations will not be implemented. It is not, for example, proposed to terminate the programme in the statutory sector, including schools.

Top
Share