Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 16 Feb 2000

Vol. 514 No. 4

Adjournment Debate. - EU Fishing Policy.

The EU fishing policy, which was negotiated in 1983, was a disaster for fishermen and women along the coastline. The implications are still being felt daily. The harbours in Balbriggan, Skerries and Lough Shinny were deemed to be surplus to requirements as far as Government national fishing policy was concerned. As a consequence, they were not upgraded and maintained. Today, the fishing industry in north Dublin consists of 19 small boats of an average size of 50 feet fishing for prawns and 11 fishing for razors. That contrasts with a thriving industry in the late 1970s and early 1980s.

The Minister should put himself in the shoes of the fishermen. Last Friday evening they were informed by one of the officials in his Department that on the following Monday, as a consequence of Commission regulation EC304/2000, they would be prohibited from fishing for prawns in their traditional area, which stretches from north of Bray to south of Dundalk. That was to take effect from 14 February until 30 April 2000. At the same time they were informed that, by way of derogation, provided they adhered to certain mesh sizes and other requirements, they could fish at a location some 2.5 hours journey time north east of Skerries. That is unrealistic. Having regard to the size of their boats, the journey time and the weather conditions, the boats and their crews would be at risk given the severe weather in that part of the Irish Sea at this time of the year. This news devastated the fishermen and their families, who in any event were finding it extremely difficult to earn a living. Many of them have young families and large mortgages on their homes and boats.

The future of these few prawn fishermen lies in the balance due to circumstances outside their control, the need for the conservation of cod in the Irish Sea. People affected in other harbours may be able to pursue alternatives for the ten week period, given the size of their fleet, but the fishermen and women of Skerries, Lough Shinny and Balbriggan have no alternative to pursue during this period and such a prohibition from fishing may recur during the next four or five years.

I accept that this deal, unacceptable as it for the fishermen in question, has been signed off at national and EU level. However, I appeal to the Minister, in the context of justice and inclusiveness, to arrange a meeting between his officials, himself and the representatives of the fishermen concerned to agree a formula to compensate this small sector of the fishing industry which has got such a raw deal over the years. Given what they have endured down through the years, they deserve nothing less. They look forward to the Minister and the Deputies in their constituency supporting what I have said and what my colleague, Deputy Sargent, will say.

Following a ban on all fishing from 14 February to 30 April this year off the coast of Dublin, Meath and Louth to allow cod stocks to recover, fishermen in the tidal ports, like Balbriggan, Skerries and Lough Shinny must now steam at least two hours instead of the usual 35 minutes before they can shoot their nets. Without some financial assistance over the period of the ban, the Minister is forcing fishermen to make an impossible choice. They must either go fishing and compromise normal safety standards by going so far out to fish or tie up boats and forfeit their income for ten weeks, risking the permanent loss of crews who will be forced to find alternative employment.

Apportioning compensation using log book returns would acknowledge in a fair way the hardship being caused by the Irish Sea cod recov ery plan. However, observers and prawn fishermen and women continue to wonder why this cod conservation plan is affecting small prawn boats even worse than cod trawlers. Ninety foot to 100 foot pelagic trawlers can travel further and can continue fishing for cod outside the exclusion zone. Some of these bigger pelagic boats are changing their gear and using prawn nets. This will drive down the price of prawns, making a bad situation worse for the small prawn boats.

Having met 25 of the 170 families affected outside the Dáil yesterday, I raised this matter on the Order of Business and with the Minister. I hope he has reflected overnight on the need to answer the concerns of these prawn fishermen and women who believe in conservation, as I and the Minister do, but who cannot live without any income for ten weeks. If the Minister is determined, as it appeared yesterday, to act like Margaret Thatcher by saying compensation is out, a meeting is out and even fishing for prawns is out, then the game plan in the Department is even more serious than the cod stock recovery plan alone. Unless the Minister is prepared to meet the fishermen and respond to their concerns, in effect, he is saying he wants to end fishing by 50 foot to 65 foot single riggers in the Irish Sea. The choice then for fishermen is to leave fishing or go into more debt by buying bigger boats to catch more fish by night as well as by day. How will this help the conservation of fish stocks?

Last Friday the Minister launched a mega trawler for Mr. McHugh while his officials were on the docks in Balbriggan and Skerries delivering the devastating news that the ten week ban would come into operation with effect from last Monday. If Mr. McHugh wants to fish all year round off the coast of Africa, good luck to him, but the Minister's job is to protect the livelihoods of all fishermen, not to discriminate against smaller boats in favour of larger trawlers.

This in-shore fishery is as important as a mountainside is to a farmer. Whereas on land there is ‘set aside', headage payments and any manner of assistance, which is expected and normal, on the sea it seems the Minister is happy to throw these seafaring men and women to the proverbial sharks. I ask him to think twice about this, as this plan discriminates against smaller boats in favour of larger boats. In engaging in conservation, which I and all Members support, the Minister should not discriminate in that way. I ask him to meet the fishermen to redress their concerns.

Over the past decade the cod and whiting stocks in the Irish Sea have declined significantly and this has impacted negatively on east coast fishing communities. The situation has been getting progressively worse and the time has come to address it.

The latest scientific assessment on the cod stock, which became available last November, indicated that the stock had declined dramatically and was in danger of total collapse. The cod stock is now one quarter of what it was 20 years ago. Recruitment of young fish to the adult stock failed in 1997 and 1998 and the existing adult stock is almost entirely made up of fish spawned in 1996. Because there are very few young fish coming through, any fishing on the existing adult stock will further reduce the number of fish in Irish waters left to spawn in future years. There is now a real danger that this once valuable fishery will be totally wiped out.

Given the drastic scientific advice and the need for responsible action to try to conserve and replenish this fishery, the December Fisheries Council decided that an Irish Sea cod recovery plan would have to be put in place early in the new year. The Council also agreed not to close the fishery totally and instead to put in place a reduced total allowable catch of 2,100 tonnes this year. The Commission also indicated that it would act independently, under its emergency powers, to introduce measures to protect adult spawning cod in the spring of this year. The objective of the Commission initiative would be to get as many eggs as possible from the existing adult cod stock so as to maximise the number of young fish for future years.

To present a persuasive Irish position to the Commission before it acted, my Department issued a discussion paper to the Irish fishing industry in early January. This paper was subsequently discussed with east coast fishermen and following that meeting an Irish position paper was submitted to the Commission. A delegation, incorporating six Irish fishermen and their representatives, together with my Department, BIM and the Marine Institute met the Commission and other member states on 21 February to discuss the Commission proposals. At that meeting there was broad agreement on the areas which had to be closed to protect adult spawning cod. The Commission expressed strong concern about high by-catches of cod in the prawn fisheries where spawning cod are congregating. It proposed closing a large area of the western Irish Sea for prawn fishing during the cod spawning season. Given the dependence of many east coast Irish fishermen on prawn fishing, the Irish delegation sought to keep as much as possible of the prawn fishery open. The delegation pressed this issue and the Commission eventually conceded to keep the bulk of the prawn grounds open. A small area of prawn ground overlapped with the biggest concentration of spawning cod in the Irish Sea and the Commission insisted on closing this for the ten week period.

The Commission legislation closing the cod fishery was published last Friday. My Department immediately informed the industry and BIM is circulating an explanatory laminated map to fishermen on the new provisions. The Commission proposal will not have an undue impact on the east coast fishermen overall and should help to secure a future cod fishery for these fishermen.

The bulk of the prawn grounds in the Irish Sea will remain open to the prawn fishermen. I met the Balbriggan and Skerries prawn fishermen and I accept that in order to protect spawning cod, prawn fishermen in Balbriggan and Skerries will, for the next ten weeks, have to steam for an extra half hour to get to the prawn grounds. However, they are free to continue prawn fishing and this was our objective in these discussions. The new arrangements will, in the interests of conservation, cause these fishermen some limited disturbance. These measures help to secure a future for these fishermen, whereas inaction would only lead to the continued decline of fishing communities.

Discussions on the measures which the Commission will seek to apply following the conclusion of the spawning season are about to commence. I have assured the prawn fishermen that they will have a place at the table in these discussions and have invited them to a meeting in my Department next week. I hope these conservation measures can be built on in partnership with the industry to secure a brighter future for east coast fishermen.

I wish to inform Deputy Sargent that I, along with Deputy Wright, met fishermen yesterday and we had a full and frank discussion. I explained to them the difficulties with which I am faced, namely, that the Commission had already taken its decision and we were left with no choice in respect of implementing it. I assured them that in terms of future conservation measures we will try to take on board their requirements.

Deputy Sargent informed me how I should go about doing my job. I have no difficulty with that but it is the highest level of hypocrisy for the Deputy, who represents the Green Party which supposedly stands for conservation—

So do the fishermen.

—to make accusations of this nature. At least the other parties, unlike the Green Party—

Would the Minister be able to live for ten weeks without a wage?

—maintain their stance when pressure is applied.

Would the Minister be able to live for ten weeks without a wage? From where would he get his bread and butter?

Top
Share