Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 12 Apr 2000

Vol. 518 No. 1

Other Questions. - National Parks.

Enda Kenny

Question:

43 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage Gaeltacht and the Islands the reviews she has carried out on each national park regarding allocation and resources, staff requirements and refurbishment; the proposals she has received for further development and expansion from each national park centre; her response to each proposal; the finance allocated to each centre, park or office; and if she has satisfied herself that the best presentation and visitor experience is available at all times during opening hours; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [10934/00]

Financial allocations and resources are reviewed each year in the context of the preparation of business plans and the annual of estimates for my Department. Within Dúchas, the heritage service of my Department, the annual financial allocations are made on a region by region, rather than a park by park basis. Staff requirements are continually under review and I am pleased to say that, following one such review, 38 additional conservation rangers were recruited in recent months by my Department to serve throughout the country. External reviews are often carried out by my Department in regard to proposals involving significant expenditure on particular projects in national parks. The following are some recent illustrations of such reviews.

RPS Cairns consultants carried out a review in 1997 of visitor facilities at Muckross House in Killarney National Park which recommended an expansion of visitor facilities at Muckross House to cope with the expanding number of visitors to the national park. I accepted the recommendation to expand the visitor facilities and allocated more than £2.5 million Exchequer funding to the development of the walled garden complex which is being co-financed by the trustees of Muckross House in the amount of £750,000. It must be appreciated that this level of investment relates to a site visited by more than 286,000 visitors who purchased tickets and a greater number who availed of the free-to-visitor facilities.

O'Muire Smyth reported in 1996 on the development of a national park in north west Mayo and recommended the development of visitor facilities there. Under the recently published national development plan I have allocated £3 million Exchequer funding for the development of a visitor centre at Ballycroy. In relation to the Wicklow Mountains National Park, Dúchas officials are currently working with Wicklow County Council and the Glendalough and District Development Association on a visitor management project for Glendalough. The project is being financed by the EU, Wicklow County Council and my Department. A comprehensive internal review of visitor facilities at Glenveagh National Park is being carried out at present.

Visitor facilities at all national parks are subject to ongoing review. In relation to the quality of presentation and visitor experience at visitor centres, Dúchas has commissioned market research on a biennial basis in the past. This research indicated high levels of satisfaction among visitors to Dúchas sites. In 1999 a more comprehensive survey of visitor attitudes to facilities and services at Dúchas sites was carried out. The results of this detailed research will be used to develop a more sophisticated system for evaluating the quality of visitor experiences at all Dúchas sites in future.

I thank the Minister for her comprehensive reply. I am rapporteur on the national park issue for the committee. I hope that when my report is produced, it will be of some assistance to the Department. I support the expenditure on Muckross House and Ballycroy. We have no legislation governing our national parks, except for the Bourn Vincent Act which covers half of Killarney National Park. Will this issue be reinstated on the legislative agenda? Will the Minister ensure that I receive a copy of the 1999 comprehensive report on visitors facilities? National parks have become a commercial entity and given the changes in Irish life, the experience offered to visitors should be of world-class standard. The updating and refreshment of the image of the national parks is necessary in many cases.

Other than the Great Blasket to which the Minister referred earlier, is it intended to make any other areas national parks, perhaps in smaller units? Is the Minister happy with the category in which our national parks are placed, in accordance with the world definition of national parks? Some of these are described as wilderness areas where there should be no sign of human habitation.

I thank the Deputy for compiling a report, which he hopes will be of help to the Department. I look forward to its publication. On national parks legislation, the Deputy will be aware that we have prioritised the drafting of a national heritage plan, which is coming to fruition. Many submissions were made by interested individuals and groups and these will be the basis of work in the future. Such a plan was necessary. Priority has been given to the drafting of a national heritage plan rather than to legislation on national parks. However, when the plan is implemented, we can proceed to draft legislation.

I will make the 1999 report available to the Deputy. As the Blasket Islands were mentioned already, I need not revisit the matter. I am happy with the national parks category.

However, if the Deputy has any particular concerns on this, I will be happy to hear from him.

Top
Share