Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 19 Apr 2000

Vol. 518 No. 4

Written Answers. - Partnership Discussions.

John Bruton

Question:

11 Mr. J. Bruton asked the Taoiseach if he will elaborate on the views he expressed at the Irish Management Institute conference in Killarney, County Kerry, on 7 April 2000; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11346/00]

Ruairí Quinn

Question:

12 Mr. Quinn asked the Taoiseach if he will make a statement on the speech he delivered at the Irish Management Institute conference in Killarney, County Kerry, on 7 April 2000. [11351/00]

John Bruton

Question:

13 Mr. J. Bruton asked the Taoiseach the consideration, if any, given to the application of the women in the home movement for inclusion in the structure of future social partnership discussions; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11474/00]

John Bruton

Question:

14 Mr. J. Bruton asked the Taoiseach when he will make a decision on the application of the Irish Senior Citizens Parliament for inclusion in future partnership discussions; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11475/00]

John Bruton

Question:

15 Mr. J. Bruton asked the Taoiseach when he will make a decision on the application of the United Farmers Association for inclusion in future partnership talks; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11476/00]

Joe Higgins

Question:

16 Mr. Higgins (Dublin West) asked the Taoiseach if he will report on his recent visit to the Irish Management Institute conference. [11500/00]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 11 to 16, inclusive, together.

My keynote address to the annual conference of the Irish Management Institute on 7 April was focused on the main challenges facing the Irish economy and society in the years ahead – princi pally globalisation, EU enlargement and rapid technological change.
In particular, I emphasised the need to invest heavily so as to position Ireland to become a world-class leader in the global, knowledge-based, digital economy; to build on that through the pursuit of top-class policies on connectivity, education, regulation and partnership; and, to deliver, through social partnership, the potential inherent in the Programme for Prosperity and Fairness. That will require all sides to adhere to both the letter and spirit of the programme.
Through the provisions set out in the Government's own programme, the Programme for Prosperity and Fairness and the National Development Plan, we are well positioned to ensure the long-term sustainability of economic and social progress. I made the point in my address, however, that the enormous potential of these highly ambitious programmes can only be realised fully if we maintain the level of discipline which has served us so well in the past.
I went into considerable detail on the main challenges facing Irish society in my address, which is available in the Oireachtas Library for further reference.
On the issue of widening representation in the social partnership process, I indicated in the House last week that the spirit within which the four pillars have operated over recent years suggests the desirability that any organisation wishing to become part of the process should secure the agreement of the appropriate social partner pillar. In the event of a positive response, the Government would consider such applications sympathetically, taking due account of such factors as continuance of a fair balance in representation as between the four pillars.
Regarding the inclusion of the organisations specified in the questions, it is my understanding that none of them have yet sought formal agreement for inclusion under the appropriate pillar. With regard to the Programme for Prosperity and Fairness, obviously only those organisations involved in its negotiation will be involved in its implementation.
Top
Share