I have recently launched the report of a trial of three V.I.A. classification systems, carried out jointly by my Department and Teagasc. The trial involved a comprehensive examination of the ability of three machines to predict the carcass fat and conformation grade based on the EUROP grid given to carcasses by a panel of three classifiers and also to estimate meat yield.
The trial showed that the machines were able to predict conformation and meat yield with a relatively high degree of accuracy but they had a lower accuracy level in the case of fat cover. In general, the conclusion can be drawn that mechanical classification has considerable potential but the machines tested did not achieve the level of accuracy set down by the European Commission in their initial draft regulation for the standards to be attained by these machines prior to their approval for official use.
However, following representations by my Department, the Commission now propose to allow for further trials prior to setting down the precise standards which these machines must achieve. My Department will continue to work with the developers of these machines to assess whether their accuracy can be improved and with the Commission to ensure that the standards set down in EU regulations reflect the current state of the technology.
In any event, it will not be possible for a mechanical classification system to replace the current system of manual classification until EU regulations have been amended to provide for the use of machines. For approval, any mechanical system must be capable of meeting the standards set down in these regulations. However, pending the introduction of mechanical classification, it is open to the industry and individual producers to use the machines to underpin a graded pricing system based on the meat yield.