Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 23 May 2000

Vol. 519 No. 5

Written Answers. - Pharmacy Licences.

John McGuinness

Question:

218 Mr. McGuinness asked the Minister for Health and Children if, further to Parliamentary Question No. 159 of 23 February 2000, the report is available from the SEHB; the reasons the chief executive officer has not replied directly as indicated in the reply; the reasons the applicant was not offered the right of appeal in regard to the most recent decision and was not given a copy of the board's assessment; the reason new applications are being invited; if he will insist on a decision being made to grant an operator a licence in view of the demand; and if he will agree that the procedure now in use in inoperable. [14495/00]

The position is that following his reconsideration of the matter as directed by my predecessor, the chief executive officer of the South Eastern Health Board again decided that a definite public health need for a community pharmacy contractor agreement at Borris, County Carlow was not established under the Health (Community Pharmacy Contractor Agreement) Regulations, 1996. The applicant was made aware of his right to appeal this second decision of the chief executive officer in the matter and a copy of the assessment's board's report in the matter has been forwarded. The appeals procedures are now under way with regard to the fresh appeal. The determination of an application for a community pharmacy contractor agreement is a matter for the chief executive officer of the relevant health board under the Health (Community Pharmacy Contractor Agreement) Regulations, 1996. I am satisfied that the procedures in place under the regulations are reasonable and practicable.

The South Eastern Health Board has indicated that no new applications for a community pharmacy contractor agreement are being invited. Unfortunately, due to an error in communications, the chief executive officer of the South Eastern Health Board did not receive the request to reply directly to the Deputy in respect of the parliamentary question of 23 February 2000. The up to date position is as outlined in this present reply.

Top
Share