Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 8 Jun 2000

Vol. 520 No. 5

Ceisteanna–Questions. Priority Questions. - Drugs Task Forces.

Róisín Shortall

Question:

4 Ms Shortall asked the Minister for Education and Science the reason his Department has refused to participate directly in the local drug task forces despite the many requests to do so; the plans he plans he has for a strengthened role for his Department in the task forces and for the education sector generally in the battle against drugs, especially having regard to the increased number of heroin related deaths in recent weeks; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16298/00]

My Department is fully committed to the overall aim of the Government's drugs policy which is to provide an effective, integrated response to the problems posed by drug misuse. As part of this process, my Department is represented at senior level on the national drugs strategy team and on the interdepartmental group which, in turn, reports to the Cabinet Committee on Social Inclusion of which I am a member.

In relation to representation on the local drugs task forces, the areas covered by the task forces correspond to a great extent to areas covered by the area based partnerships. The educational issues of concern to the drugs task forces are also the concern of the education sub-committees of the partnerships. My Department is represented on each partnership and also provides the funding for full-time and part-time education co-ordinators to support the work of the partnerships. In the circumstances, given the need for co-operation and integration at local level, my Department proposed that its representation on the drugs task forces be provided by the education co-ordinators of the partnerships. This is a reasonable and workable arrangement.

My Department has taken a number of initiatives in the fight against drugs. A programme of substance misuse prevention education for primary schools was developed by my Department in consultation with the partners in education and all other relevant interests. This programme is called Walk Tall and its dissemination commenced in January 1999. It has now been introduced to 2,150 primary schools, which represents approximately 67% of primary schools. The funds provided for the dissemination in 1999 amounted to £500,000 and a similar amount has been provided in 2000 to continue the process.

At second level, the substance misuse prevention programme, On My Own Two Feet, has been introduced in approximately 570 post primary schools. This represents 75% of the total number of post primary schools.

Additional informationA total of £70,000 was spent on this programme in 1999. In addition, it is planned that social, personal and health education – SPHE – including substance misuse prevention education, will be phased into all schools at junior cycle over a three year period, beginning in September 2000.

The role of my Department in the fight against drugs is further strengthened by the young people's facilities and services fund. An Exchequer contribution of approximately £35 million over three years has been set aside for this fund which was established by the Government in 1998 to assist in the development of preventative strategies in a targeted manner through the pro vision of youth facilities, including sport and recreational facilities, and services in disadvantaged areas where a significant drug problem exists or has the potential to develop.

Does the Minister accept that poor educational achievement and early school leaving are definite characteristics of the vast majority of heroin users? Does he, therefore, also accept that tackling educational disadvantage could have a significant impact in terms of tackling the drugs issue? For this reason, does he accept it is important that a senior representative of his Department is a member of each of the drugs task forces? Does he accept the case being made by all the drugs task forces in their request, which the Minister refused, for a senior representative of the Department? The purpose of this request is to educate senior representatives from the Department of Education and Science on the issues surrounding disadvantage and drug use because of the poor response to date from the Department.

I agree with the Deputy that early school leaving and poor education are related to drug abuse. Disadvantage is a major problem in that area. I will bear that general syndrome in mind regarding the programme designed to tackle disadvantage which will be implemented soon. The policy up to this point has been to have personnel on the area based partnerships which also represent the Department on the drugs groups.

That policy has been rejected at community level.

There are all sorts of objections to all sorts of things. The number of staff and the time they have available is a problem. I am outlining the policy to date.

It is not an acceptable policy.

I intend to examine that matter. I have some ideas about developing a better way of communicating and co-ordinating on a local basis with the local task forces in particular.

In most cases there is now a new way of doing business where decisions are taken through a bottom-up approach, not diktats issued by the Department. Is the Minister aware that in education there has been a great deal of effort at community level to tackle disadvantage and drug abuse? The Minister should respond positively to demands made at local community level. Is he aware that in the second plan currently being prepared by the drugs task forces a vast amount of money is being earmarked for community educational initiatives to compensate for the inadequacies in mainstream educational services? Does he accept this is an indictment of the education system?

I appreciate the bottom up approach to management. In 1970 the Institute of Public Administration published a book on it which I wrote. It is not as new to me as the Deputy might think.

Perhaps the Minister could circulate that book.

I agree with the Deputy and I will look afresh at the situation.

Top
Share