Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 11 Apr 2001

Vol. 534 No. 4

Other Questions. - Special Areas of Conservation.

Ruairí Quinn

Question:

35 Mr. Quinn asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage Gaeltacht and the Islands the steps being taken under the Wildlife Act, 1976, to provide protection for seals; if her attention has been drawn to the fact that Ireland is now the only coastal EU country without a seal sanctuary; if her Department has received an application for funding for an Irish Seal Sanctuary at Skerries, County Dublin, where a site has been provided by Fingal County Council; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [10695/01]

The seal is a protected species under the Wildlife Act, 1976, and cannot be hunted, killed or injured other than under licence. Any complaints received about interference with seals or unauthorised shootings are investigated by conservation rangers employed by Dúchas, the heritage service. The Wildlife (Amendment) Act, 2000, enhances the level of protection for seals and other protected species in that it provides for the protection of the resting places of these animals in addition to the breeding places, which are protected under the Wildlife Act, 1976. Section 42 of the Wildlife Act, 1976, provides that where damage is being caused by a protected wild animal, in this case seals, to a fishery, the Minister may cause such steps to be taken, by an authorised person, to stop the damage. Permission issued under section 42 provides for the shooting of seals at nets that are subject to damage and each specific application is considered on its merits. Ten licences under section 42 were issued last year in respect of seals.

I am aware that Ireland is the only coastal EU country without a seal sanctuary. My Department has received a number of applications for funding for an Irish Seal Sanctuary, as referred to by the Deputy. I met representatives of the Irish Seal Sanctuary, at their request, to discuss their future plans, and officials from my Department later examined their draft development plan. The Irish Seal Sanctuary has made many approaches for aid in the past in running its existing facility at Garristown, but the fact remains that the proposed new sanctuary is a rehabilitation facility catering to a relatively small number of injured seals rather than contributing to the overall conservation of the species which is my concern. I have made it clear on previous occasions in this House that my responsibility, under the wildlife Acts, is to protect seals and other mammals to ensure the conservation of the species as a whole. The work of the Irish Seal Sanctuary is primarily of a welfare nature and, as such, does not come within the remit of my Department. While I recognise the continuing excellence of the work done by the Irish Seal Sanctuary from a conservation point of view, such work does not impact significantly on overall seal numbers and would not warrant funding from my Department.

Can I take it from what the Minister has told us, that she is legally precluded from giving any assistance, be it capital or revenue, to a seal sanctuary? In relation to the other coastal EU member states, which Department of Government, in those countries, provides financial assistance to these sanctuaries?

It is not a question of being legally prohibited from giving such help in this regard. I have stated on many occasions that the question of animal welfare comes directly under the aegis of the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Rural Development. Conservation is my direct responsibility and I hope that in my initial reply I differentiated sufficiently between both responsibilities.

As regards the second part of the Deputy's question, there may be an opportunity to contact the Department of the Environment and Local Government with regard to making a strong appeal for environmental tourist interests. From time to time, the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Rural Development has assisted animal welfare projects and, therefore, this source could also be considered if such funding is to be made available.

Can I take it from what the Minister has said that if applications are made either to the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Rural Development or the Minister for the Environment and Local Government, or to both Ministers, she would support them in so far as that course is available to her?

When I met those concerned about this issue it was put to them that these outlets could be considered in the hope that some financial assistance might be made available. From a personal point of view, I would have absolutely no problem with funding this particular sanctuary but my responsibility is for conservation, not animal welfare which is the responsibility of other Departments. I cannot speak for other Departments and would not attempt to do so. That is why I believe it may be wise to contact those particular Departments to see what response will be forthcoming.

Top
Share