Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 1 May 2001

Vol. 535 No. 1

Written Answers - Schools Funding.

Phil Hogan

Question:

648 Mr. Hogan asked the Minister for Education and Science the timescale for the implementation of recommendations contained in the report of funding for second level schools; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11871/01]

Minister for Education and Science (Dr. Woods)

I propose to take Questions Nos. 595 and 648 together.

As the Deputies will be aware the funding arrangements for our schools have evolved in an ad hoc manner and reflect the traditional sectoral division of our second level system.

I consider that the Blackstock report on the funding of second level schools, represents a comprehensive review of the funding arrangements of post-primary schools and is a valuable document in both its analysis and clarity of approach.

The recommendations made in the Blackstock report for the future funding arrangements of second level schools are under review. At the core of the recommendations made for future funding arrangements are the principles of equity of treatment, transparency of funding structures and adequacy of funding levels. Although my priority is to focus on the issue of adequacy of funding, I am aware of the traditional anomalies that have evolved in the funding arrangements for the different school types at second level, and it is my intention to bring greater uniformity and cohesion to this particular aspect of the funding of schools.

I have already shown my commitment in this regard by establishing the School Services Support Fund. The introduction of this support fund is a significant initiative in the funding of our schools. A school with 500 pupils now receives additional annual funding of £20 per pupil or £10,000, with a minimum payment for smaller schools of £4,000 per school. This fund channels an additional £7 million to schools each year. While provision for support services, including secretarial and caretaking, is a particular focus of this fund, schools are being given discretion, in line with that available in relation toper capita grants, as to how this additional funding is best utilised in the interests of their pupils. In addition, schools will benefit from a further increase in the standard per capita grant. The grant was increased to £184 from £177 last year. It was further increased by £8 from September last to £192 and will be significantly increased by £10 for the next school year. For a school with 500 pupils this amounts to an extra £12,500 per annum and a total capitation grant of £101,000 towards general expenses. An additional per capita grant of £30 per pupil is paid to disadvantaged schools, thereby bringing the total grant in the case of such a school with 500 pupils to £116,000.

My approach to date has clearly shown my commitment and determination to address the needs of schools. I am committed to improving further the funding of second level schools in the light of available resources. I assure the Deputies that it is my intention that the recommendations of the Blackstock report on the funding of second level schools will inform policy on future school funding.