Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 15 May 2001

Vol. 536 No. 2

Written Answers - Schools Funding.

John McGuinness

Question:

469 Mr. McGuinness asked the Minister for Education and Science if he intends to implement the funding report, the Blackstock report, regarding the funding of voluntary secondary schools; if the payment of grants for secretaries and caretakers will be re-extended to all secondary schools on the same basis as community and comprehensive schools; if insurance grants and cleaning grants will also be extended on the same basis; if a timetable for the implementation of the report is in place; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13756/01]

The funding arrangements for our post primary schools have evolved in an ad hoc manner and reflect the sectoral division of our second level system. I have already made it clear in the House that I consider that the report of the steering group on the funding of second level schools, represents a comprehensive review of the funding arrangements of post primary schools and is a valuable document in both its analysis and clarity of approach.

The recommendations made in the steering group's report for the future funding arrangements of second level schools are under review. At the core of the recommendations made for future funding arrangements are the principles of equity of treatment, transparency of funding structures and adequacy of funding levels. Although my priority is to focus on the issue of adequacy of funding, I am conscious of the traditional anomalies that have evolved in the funding arrangements for the different school types at second level, and I am committed to bring greater equity and cohesion to this particular aspect of the funding of schools.

I have already shown my commitment in this regard by establishing the school services support fund. The introduction of this support fund is a significant initiative in the funding of our schools. A school with 500 pupils will now receive additional annual funding of £20 per pupil or £10,000, with a minimum payment for smaller schools of £4,000 per school. This fund will channel an additional £7 million to schools each year.

While provision for support services, including secretarial and caretaking, is a particular focus of this fund, schools are being given discretion, in line with that available in relation to per capita grants, as to how this additional funding is best utilised in the interests of their pupils. In addition, schools will benefit from a further increase in the standard per capita grant. The grant was increased to £184 from £177 last year. It was further increased by £8 from September last to £192 and will be significantly increased by £10 for the next school year. For a school with 500 pupils, this amounts to an extra £12,500 per annum, and a total capitation grant of £101,000 towards general expenses. An additional per capita grant of £30 per pupil is paid to disadvantaged schools bringing the total grant in the case of such a school with 500 pupils to £116,000.

My approach to date has clearly shown my commitment and determination to address the needs of schools. I am committed to improving further the funding position of second level schools in the light of available resources and to addressing the issue of equity raised by the voluntary secondary schools.

Top
Share