Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 15 May 2001

Vol. 536 No. 2

Priority Questions. - Weapons Decommissioning.

Seán Ryan

Question:

64 Mr. S. Ryan asked the Minister for Defence if, in view of the fact that decommissioned mortars were rejected by the ISPAT plant in Cobh, County Cork, due to the level of radioactive contamination, the Defence Forces have undertaken an audit to identify weapons or materials that may present a similar hazard; the location where the rejected material is stored; the plans for its future storage; if new guidelines have been issued for the safe disposal of such materials; if he will ensure personnel are not exposed to unnecessary risk; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13771/01]

The decommissioning of old mortars took place in 1999. The mortars, 200 in all, were purchased from Brandt, a French company, in the period 1936 to 1955.

On the recommendation of a military board of survey, the mortars were converted to scrap in Clancy Barracks in Dublin. The scrapped mortars were removed to the Irish Steel plant, ISPAT, in Haulbowline, County Cork in October 1999 for reprocessing.

When the scrapped mortars arrived in the Irish Steel plant, the radiation detection alarm on the premises was activated. Irish Steel, as required by law, alerted the Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland and the scrap was not accepted.

A technical expert from the RPII was requested to investigate the source and extent of the radiation and to advise on procedures. He identified the source of the radiation as the radionuclides, radium 226 and radium 228. The radium is found in the luminous strip on the cross levelling bubble located on the bipod of the mortar. It is understood that wrist watches which were manufactured around the same period were luminised with similar radioactive material.

The RPII has stated that a person would have to be in very close proximity to the illuminating bubble of a mortar stand for a minimum of 4,000 hours to be subjected to the safe allowable annual amount of radiation. Taking into account the level of usage of this type of equipment in the Defence Forces, it is impossible for members of the Defence Forces to be subjected to anything near to the safe allowable annual amount of radiation.

The task of isolating those cut mortar bipod sections which were radioactive was undertaken by ordnance personnel on 19 October 1999. All personnel involved were adequately protected using disposable overalls, face masks, gloves and personal dosimeters. The non-radioactive scrap was handed over to Irish Steel for reprocessing. The isolated segments were returned to Clancy Barracks in Dublin.

The isolated radioactive segments are stored in steel bins in Clancy Barracks in a special radioac tive materials storage facility. This facility is constructed in accordance with international requirements for the storage of such items and comes under the RPII for audit and inspections. The material will remain in this facility until a new one is built in the new Defence Forces logistics base in the Curragh. The facility is operated in accordance with RPII guidelines. Should the RPII guidelines change, the military authorities will update their instructions as required.

It is mandatory for the Department of Defence and the Defence Forces to maintain a register and inventory of all radioactive substances and to be licensed by the RPII in that regard. The Department and the Defence Forces meet all the requirements of the RPII in that regard. The Defence Forces has carried out a full audit of the ordnance materials and systems under its control and none presents any hazard from radiation.

Does the Minister accept, notwithstanding his detailed reply, that it seems extraordinary that the Defence Forces were not aware of the presence of the radioactive contamination before assigning military and civilian personnel to cut the weapons with blowtorches prior to dispatch to Haulbowline? Does he accept the personnel involved should not have been asked to undertake this task without being made aware of the safety implications?

On the basis of the information available to me any activities of that kind conducted by the Defence Forces are carried out under the strictest regulations. As I indicated in my reply, the information from the RPII is that an individual would have to be exposed for an extraordinary length of time to come any way close to the allowable radiation levels. The information from the Defence Forces was that there was no risk and no hazard involved to the individuals concerned.

As the Minister said, the RPII was asked to prepare a report of the incident in Clancy Barracks. The safety committee in the barracks was not informed of its contents or of the details of the report. Will the Minister arrange for the report to be made available to the safety committee in Clancy Barracks? The Minister may be satisfied there is no problem but the personnel who were involved are concerned. Will the Minister arrange medical checks for the personnel involved to reassure them that their health has not been compromised? Furthermore, will he outline the steps he or the Defence Forces propose to take to ensure the safest and most effective disposal for the future? In his reply he said that the items, now in Clancy Barracks, would be dispatched to the Curragh. Personnel in the Curragh will be concerned. The matter should be clarified and all the facts made known.

We must proceed to Question No. 65. We have exhausted the time on that.

I have to get a reply.

I would be happy to make any material such as reports available to the personnel concerned. There is no need for screening tests. The transfer of this material to the Curragh will be done under the strictest standards set out by the radiological institute.

Top
Share