Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 27 Nov 2001

Vol. 545 No. 1

Adjournment Debate. - Institutes of Technology.

I thank the Ceann Comhairle for allowing me to raise this matter which concerns the institute of technology in Tralee. I am sure the Minister of State is well aware of the importance of the institute to County Kerry and indeed the south-west. The college is at a very important phase of its development. It has 3,500 full-time and part-time students and 250 staff, and has an important European Union dimension with many foreign students enrolled. The college is very well placed to contribute to the future development of County Kerry, in particular with the opening of the Kerry Technology Park, which many of us worked very hard to achieve over the years, on an adjoining site and the opening of the institute's new north campus.

These events augur well for the educational, industrial and technological development of the county. Unfortunately, all has not been well in the college. My understanding is that the Department appointed an inspector to investigate certain matters regarding the administration of the college and the virtual breakdown of relations between the management and staff. Despite my best efforts and numerous requests to the Department of Education and Science, no information has been forthcoming from the Minister's office regarding this report. I understand that the Mini ster received this prior to July of this year. I am not here to play politics with the problems encountered in the institute of technology in Tralee – they are much too serious for that. We are entitled to information and answers, particularly in the public interest.

There are questions the Minister must answer and they should be answered in the House tonight. Recent days have been extremely frustrating for staff and those interested in education in Kerry. The Department was poised to make a statement last Thursday, but despite persistent requests from my office and others, no statement was forthcoming. Likewise on Friday, the Department of Education and Science absolutely failed to offer clarification.

I would like the Minister of State to answer these questions in the House. They are in the public interest and should be answered. Perhaps she will tell the House the status of the chairman of the board of the institute. What is the status of the director of the institute of technology? Consequent on the answers to those questions, what action does the Minister propose to take to restore confidence in the administration of the institute and to ensure that there is a constructive relationship between management, staff and students?

This is a very valuable resource to the education infrastructure of the country. I do not believe we can stand by and watch what is happening. The Department has responsibilities – indeed it is probably not the responsibility of the Minister of State but rather of the Minister for Education and Science, Deputy Woods. It is long overdue that he takes action on what is happening in the college. It is important that the people of Kerry have answers and that action is taken on these matters. For too long the Department has failed to act and we now see the consequences, an administrative breakdown in the college.

I am sure the acting director – as I understand appointed informally or otherwise by the Department last Friday – will have the confidence and support of all who care about third level education in County Kerry. I wish him well in his new responsibilities. He will need the full support of the Minister and the Department if he is to make progress in the current difficult circumstances. The responsibility lies with the Department of Education and Science and the sooner the information is in the public domain the better for everybody.

I thank Deputy Spring for raising this matter. It is an important matter for Tralee and the south-west region.

In April 2000 the Minister for Education and Science decided to appoint an inspector to inquire into certain matters relating to the operation and management of the institute of technology in Tralee. The inspection was carried out in accordance with the provisions of section 20 of the Regional Technical Colleges Act, 1992, and the inspector's terms of reference were to inquire into the following matters in respect of the institute of technology, Tralee: (i) the working relationship between the governing body and the director; (ii) how the respective roles of governing body, chairman of the governing body and director are being carried out and whether the manner in which the roles are carried out is consistent with effective management and operation of the institute; (iii) the implementation by the institute and the governing body of directions and guidelines on the operation of the institute, issued by the Minister or the Department, with particular regard to directions and guidelines relating to staff appointments and courses of study; (iv) any and all other matters which the inspector considers to be necessary or expedient to the carrying out of the terms of reference at paragraphs (i) to (iii) and which relate to the efficiency of instruction given in the institute or the efficient operation of the institute; and to report to him on his inquires and in that report to make such findings and recommendations as he considers appropriate.

The inspector furnished his report to the Minister last March. Following detailed consideration of the inspector's report the Minister decided to establish a sworn inquiry into a number of issues arising from it. Pending the outcome of this inquiry he has suspended the director of the institute from the office of director. The chairman of the governing body has informed the Minister that he has stepped down from his position. To provide for the smooth running of the institute he has appointed the institute's registrar, Mr. Michael Carmody, as acting director of the institute in a temporary capacity pending completion of the inquiry process.

The Minister is concerned that these events will not seriously prejudice the governance and operation of the institute and the welfare of its students. He has therefore asked the acting director to arrange for the convening of a meeting of the governing body of the institute at the earliest possible opportunity. I understand that a meeting of the governing body was arranged for today and that the deputy chairman or, if that office is vacant, a member of the governing body chosen by the members was to chair the meeting.

Does the Minister of State know who chaired the meeting?

I am sorry, I do not have that information. Officials of the Department are currently engaged in making the necessary arrangements for the initiation of a sworn inquiry. In this regard it will be necessary to consult the Office of the Attorney General.

May I raise one small—

There is no provision to do so and we do not want to introduce a precedent.

In fairness, a Leas-Cheann Comhairle—

Deputy Spring, there is a long-standing tradition and in fairness to the staff of the House, we cannot allow supplementary—

Will the Minister tell me when the Minister decided to establish a sworn inquiry?

There is no provision for supplementary questions.

This is very unsatisfactory. The Minister of State read a statement—

Deputy Spring, the Chair has no control over the answer to any issue raised on the Adjournment. It is a matter entirely for the Minister.

The Minister is telling us she does not know when the Minister—

Deputy Spring, you are being disorderly. We have had a very good run on the Adjournment over the past four years and we would not like to break that.

Top
Share