Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 25 Jun 2002

Vol. 553 No. 5

Written Answers. - Symphysiotomy Procedures.

Seamus Kirk

Question:

313 Mr. Kirk asked the Minister for Health and Children the position in relation to the concerns of women who underwent a symphysiotomy a number of years ago; if he has sought a report from the Institute of Obstetricians; if so, if he will make the report available to Members of the Oireachtas; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14716/02]

Arising from concerns about the use of symphysiotomy in obstetrical practice in the past, the chief medical officer at my Department asked the Institute of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists for its comments and advice on the matter.

The institute represents obstetrical and gynaecological opinion in Ireland, acts as an advisory body on matters relating to education, research and administration in the specialty and seeks to raise standards in obstetrics and gynaecology in this country.

The institute has replied to the CMO and confirms that from around 1920 until around 1960 symphysiotomy procedures were carried out on selected patients, mainly in the National Maternity Hospital and the Coombe Hospital. Excellent results were claimed for this procedure which had the effect of permanently enlarging the pelvis and allowing women to undergo normal delivery. This was at a time when caesarean section had a high mortality rate due to sepsis. Sepsis was one of the leading causes of maternal death at that time. The institute states that in properly conducted cases, complications were rare. Published medical reports of the time indicate favourable results for the procedure. Many of the cases referred to in these reports were emergency admissions with obstructed labour where sepsis following caesarean section would have carried a significant risk of maternal death.

The institute states that from 1950 onwards, the operation of symphysiotomy for obstructed labour was replaced by the modern caesarean section. Antibiotics were available by then to treat infection and sepsis was less of a hazard.

The House will appreciate that we must be cautious about judging procedures and interventions which were used in previous generations in the light of current knowledge and experience. Enormous medical advances have been made since the 1950s and 1960s and medical care and procedures were not as advanced then as they are in Ireland today.

I am arranging for a copy of the report to be forwarded to the Deputy.

Top
Share