Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 26 Jun 2002

Vol. 553 No. 6

Ceisteanna – Questions (Resumed). Priority Questions. - Third Level Education.

Joe Costello

Question:

45 Mr. Costello asked the Minister for Education and Science if his attention has been drawn to the recent report by a person (details supplied) showing that access to third level education remains deeply unequal, with school leavers in some areas ten times more likely to go to college than those in deprived areas; the steps he intends to take to address this serious problem and ensure equal access to third level education for those from all areas; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14802/02]

I am aware of the report in question by Professor Pat Clancy, which found substantial variability in the rates of admission to higher education in its examination of admission rates by postal districts in Dublin, with a range from 7% to 77% across the different postal districts. The report concludes that this variability reflects the socio-economic patterning of the population. In terms of admission rates by socio-economic group, the report shows that there has been a significant improvement in the proportion of persons coming from the two lowest socio-economic groups entering higher education as follows:

In 1980, only 3% of persons coming from the unskilled manual workers group entered higher education. This increased to 12% in 1992 and 21% in 1998; in 1980, only 9% of persons coming from the semi-skilled manual workers group entered higher education. This increased to 19% in 1992 and 23% in 1998.

Part of this increase in admission rates derives from the doubling of the overall admission rate to higher education between 1980 and 1998. However, it should be noted that this latest survey, based on entrants in autumn 1998, is before the significant additional funding committed by the previous Government to further and higher education.

New measures have been introduced specifically aimed at increasing access to third level education. There is a provision within the national development plan for a third level access fund totalling €120 million, over the period 2000 to 2006, to tackle disadvantage at third level. The provision for measures to promote access to further and higher education has increased significantly from €0.5 million in respect of 1997 to €26 million in 2002.

Additional InformationIn line with a commitment under the Programme for Prosperity and Fairness my predecessor, Deputy Woods, established the action group on access to third level education to advise on the development of a co-ordinated strategy to increase participation of students from disadvantaged backgrounds, mature students and students with a disability at third level. The action group's report was published in July 2001.

To date, a number of measures have been taken in response to some of the main recommendations in the report. Special rates of maintenance grant, usually referred to as top-up grants, payable to disadvantaged grant holders, have been introduced with effect from the 2000-01 academic year, with the full rate of the special grant amounting to €3,809. A review of the operation of the special grants has been undertaken by my Department in light of the initial take-up and with a view to extending eligibility.

A new millennium partnership fund for disadvantage was introduced with effect from 2001. The fund provides assistance to partnership companies and community groups to develop their support schemes for students from disadvantaged families. Area Development Management Limited, under whose aegis the partnerships operate, accepted my Department's request that it would administer the fund for the 2001-02 academic year. The total allocation for the 2001-02 academic year was €1.2 million, with 37 partnerships and community groups receiving allocations from the fund. My Department is at present considering a report from ADM on the operation of the fund during 2001-02.

Financial support is also available to students in approved third level institutions through the student assistance-access fund. The objective of the fund, which is ESF-aided, is to assist students who might, due to their financial circumstances, be unable to continue their third level studies. The fund is administered on a discretionary basis by each third level institution and provides direct financial support to disadvantaged students to assist them to remain on in college. The provision for this fund has increased significantly from €2.49 million in respect of the 2000-01 academic year to €7.49 million in respect of the 2001-02 academic year.

I am committed to progressing other recommendations in the report of the action group on access to third level education and to ensuring that the issue of equity of access to third level education remains a priority during my tenure of office as Minister for Education and Science.

I also congratulate the Minister on his appointment. I am sure we will have a profitable and productive time in the next couple of years.

Does the Minister not agree that Professor Clancy's report makes a mockery of the assertion that we have one of the best education systems in the world? Only 7% have access to third level education in the heart of the inner city, the area the Taoiseach and I represent. Cutbacks in CE schemes will affect pre-school and after-school services. Does the Minister not agree that we have made no progress if the participation rates are worse than in 1992, that all the talk about ours being the best education system in the world is false and that disparity of access in deprived areas has been growing?

I would like to ask a supplementary question about disadvantage and third level education.

This time is for Priority Questions. Only Deputy Costello is entitled to ask a supplementary to this question.

I do not accept Deputy Costello's point that levels of access mean that the quality of our education is less than we claim it to be. I agree strongly that there is no good in having the best education system in the world if not everyone has an equal chance of getting to it. However, I do not agree that we are not making progress in this matter. A number of other things are happening and I intend to continue to underline the importance of equality of access. The action group on access to third level education published its report in July 2001 and proposed a number of measures including special rates of maintenance grants for people in deprived areas. The new millennium partnership fund for disadvantage was introduced with effect from 2001 and Area Development Management Limited is promoting this in the 37 partnership areas throughout the country. That is significant progress. The money for increased access is there and it is being promoted. We have much more to do in that area and in my term as Minister for Education and Science, I intend to try to ensure there is real equality of access to education for everybody, not just at third level but also from primary level upwards.

In relation to increased access, would the Minister not agree that Professor Clancy found that the access programmes were grossly under funded and that the courses were not moulded to suit the pupil? Having mentioned ADM, why does the Department of Education and Science not put a representative on the partnerships? Why is there no representative of the Department of Education and Science on the drugs task force? Why will it not send somebody to represent it in the community where the real need is?

Those issues are being addressed. I agree that one of the weaknesses of the Department of Education and Science previously has been its lack of a local presence in areas such as partnerships, ADMs, county development boards, etc. It has been addressed in relation to the task force. As a result of the Cromien report, a number of initiatives will be taken including the establishment of regional offices, the setting up of NEPS, etc., which will facilitate greater participation by the Department of Education and Science at a local level.

I trust the Minister will do more about this than his predecessor.

It is extremely important that there be a local presence from the Department and I intend to ensure that happens.

Can I ask—

We must proceed. We are on priority questions.

It is an issue of great interest.

No, these are priority questions. It is not in order for the Deputy to ask a supplementary.

Top
Share